Party reviewing internal election rules: you have until 21 January to send in your views

In November I blogged my suggestions for how the party’s internal election rules should be changed. In brief – fewer restrictions on candidates and voters being able to talk about the contests and who they support, more leeway for online campaigning and a series of steps to encourage more debate and discussion within the party about the elections and merits of candidates. The last point was fuelled by my experience of standing (successfully) for the Interim Peers Panel – and being asked almost no policy questions by voters in the process.

Following the federal committee, interim peers panel and Presidential elections, feedback from candidates and other participants is being gathered with a report and (potentially) recommendations for change going to the Federal Executive in March. Most likely recommendations would then in turn require a vote at party conference, probably in the autumn, though some changes (particularly those of administrative detail) the FE could approve without needing to go to conference.

If you have views and have not yet sent them in, now is the time to do so. Having checked with David Allworthy, if you send them in by 21 January then there is time for them to be included in the process. David can be contacted at david.allworthy AT libdems.org.uk or 4 Cowley Street, London, SW1P 3NB.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Party policy and internal matters.
Advert

4 Comments

  • One chnage should be thjat anyone standing as part of an organised slate – ie Liberal Vision or Social Liberal Forum should have to state that they are part of that slate.

  • Jonathan Fryer 13th Jan '11 - 3:38pm

    It is worth bearing in mind that apllying to be a GLA candidate, unlike standing for internal party elections, is like applying for a job, and should be treated with the same degree of seriousness and commitment. An indeterminate number of successful applicants (probably between 3 and 5) were guaranteed a job at the end of the process — actually a far higher sucess rate than proportionately one would find on the normal job market!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGlenn 1st Oct - 2:51am
    Jonathon' I never said they did. I'm just arguing that it did no good for either us or Libya. However, I would suggest the number...
  • User AvatarJonathan Brown 1st Oct - 1:48am
    Thanks @Lorenzo - I used to live in Syria too (about half of the time between 2004-2007). In many ways it was a hopeful place....
  • User Avatarchris_sh 1st Oct - 1:40am
    @Ian Hurdley " ... involves activating Article 50 of the Treaty of Lisbon. That action would overturn primary legislation." If the treaty as passed in...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 1st Oct - 1:04am
    It is a failure of past complacency too, putting it mildly, always the present leaders of the free world get the most criticism, something Jonathan,...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 1st Oct - 12:54am
    Kaine is a good man with a solid reputation of humanitarian effort going back to his youth as a volunteer in Honduras, this piece shows...
  • User AvatarGlenn 1st Oct - 12:14am
    Jonathon; You said "I think had this objective been pursued things would be less bad than they are now". Well of course most Libyans don't...