Party reviewing internal election rules: you have until 21 January to send in your views

In November I blogged my suggestions for how the party’s internal election rules should be changed. In brief – fewer restrictions on candidates and voters being able to talk about the contests and who they support, more leeway for online campaigning and a series of steps to encourage more debate and discussion within the party about the elections and merits of candidates. The last point was fuelled by my experience of standing (successfully) for the Interim Peers Panel – and being asked almost no policy questions by voters in the process.

Following the federal committee, interim peers panel and Presidential elections, feedback from candidates and other participants is being gathered with a report and (potentially) recommendations for change going to the Federal Executive in March. Most likely recommendations would then in turn require a vote at party conference, probably in the autumn, though some changes (particularly those of administrative detail) the FE could approve without needing to go to conference.

If you have views and have not yet sent them in, now is the time to do so. Having checked with David Allworthy, if you send them in by 21 January then there is time for them to be included in the process. David can be contacted at david.allworthy AT libdems.org.uk or 4 Cowley Street, London, SW1P 3NB.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Party policy and internal matters.
Advert

4 Comments

  • One chnage should be thjat anyone standing as part of an organised slate – ie Liberal Vision or Social Liberal Forum should have to state that they are part of that slate.

  • Jonathan Fryer 13th Jan '11 - 3:38pm

    It is worth bearing in mind that apllying to be a GLA candidate, unlike standing for internal party elections, is like applying for a job, and should be treated with the same degree of seriousness and commitment. An indeterminate number of successful applicants (probably between 3 and 5) were guaranteed a job at the end of the process — actually a far higher sucess rate than proportionately one would find on the normal job market!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGlenn 9th Feb - 3:24pm
    PSI. I disagree that the BBC was ever Metropolitan Left bar a few comedians now and few plays decades ago. It was essentially started by...
  • User AvatarHelen Tedcastle 9th Feb - 3:23pm
    @ Sue Doughty ' All these under represented groups bring experience and wisdom from their perspective. With the greatest respect to our 8 white men...
  • User AvatarTim13 9th Feb - 3:02pm
    malc If you look at current local government byelections (not the be all and end all, I know), UKIP councillors resign considerably more often -...
  • User AvatarGlenn 9th Feb - 3:00pm
    Has anyone ever actually bothered reading the lyrics to the French National anthem. now that's blood thirsty. My main objection to ours is that essential...
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 9th Feb - 2:58pm
    When it came to politicians impersonating their opponents the late Jeremy Thorpe took some beating. Are we allowed to mention him in polite company again?
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 9th Feb - 2:55pm
    It's really about donations to the Labour Party, isn't it? What about the 'opt in' versus the 'opt out' part of the bill? It makes...