Paul Burstow MP writes: Lifting of lifetime gay blood donation ban – progress, but not the final word

The lifetime ban on men who have had sex with men (MSM) is an issue that our party has always felt uncomfortable with. Superficially it looks little more than a discriminatory throwback to the 1980s stereotypes associated with gay men and increased risk of sexual disease.

Yesterday the Government took a significant step in changing their position by announcing the lifting of the lifetime ban on MSM from giving blood. So let me give you the detail about how that decision was reached, and what it means for men wanting to donate blood.

The previous Government had also questioned the validity of the lifetime ban, and in 2006 the then Advisory Committee on the Microbiological Safety of Blood, Tissues and Organs (MSBTO) reviewed the permanent exclusion of men who have had sex with men. That review considered that despite developments and improvements in testing and knowledge of blood borne viral infections, there was still insufficient data regarding compliance to determine the potential impact of any changes. As a result, no changes to the policy were recommended at that time.

Fast forward four years and a study, by a team at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), on the understanding of compliance with the permanent deferral contributed to a review of donor deferral periods by the Advisory Committee on the Safety of Blood, Tissues and Organs (SaBTO, MSBTO’s successor) completed in May 2011. SaBTO’s review also confirmed that there had been significant improvements in blood donation testing since the last review, leading to a revision of the ‘window periods’ when viral infections in donated blood are undetectable.

As a result, SaBTO have now recommended that the introduction of a 12 month deferral period for MSM was sufficient to maintain blood safety. SaBTO’s recommendation was that the 12month deferral was still required because of the nature of Hepatitis B infection, and of the screening tests used, it is necessary to allow 12 months from any higher risk behaviour as this is long enough for the donor to have undergone and recovered from an infection.

The health departments of England, Scotland and Wales have now subsequently announced that they have accepted SaBTO’s recommendation that men whose last sexual contact, anal or oral sex (with or without a condom), with another man was more than 12 months ago will now be able to donate blood. These changes will come into effect from 7 November 2011.

The Government has undeniably made progress on an issue that many in our party have worked tirelessly for many years to see changed. Some people reading this may consider the announcement to be a half measure, and will be disappointed that some MSM are still prevented from donating blood. However, they should also recognise that this decision was made on the recommendation of the independent scientific SaBTO and their expert Steering Group comprised of relevant clinical experts and stakeholders from MSM (the National Aids Trust, Gay Men Fighting AIDS, Stonewall and the Terence Higgins Trust) and patient (UK Thalassaemia Society and Sickle Cell Society) groups.

Liberal Democrats can be proud that it is this Coalition Government that has lifted the lifetime ban on MSM from donating blood. And they can rest assured this won’t be the final word on this issue. We have made progress based on current independently assessed scientific evidence. And what’s more, this Government will continue to follow where the science and the evidence takes us.

Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

7 Comments

  • Jonathan Featonby 9th Sep '11 - 2:26pm

    “Some people reading this may consider the announcement to be a half measure, and will be disappointed that some MSM are still prevented from donating blood. ”

    Some MSM? Basically, any sexually active gay or bisexual man is still banned. While it is indeed progress, I think even calling it a half measure is over stating it. While it makes a great soundbite “Liberal Democrats can be proud that it is this Coalition Government that has lifted the lifetime ban on MSM from donating blood”, at a time when there is a real shortage of blood donation, sexually active gay men who practice safe sex are still banned from donating, while at the same time a hetrosexual person who has multiple partners and doesn’t use a condom are not.

  • I am pleased that the ban has been lifted. It may not be where we would prefer it to be and may still prove discriminatory, but it is progress and we should be pleased that it has been made. Being happy with the lifting of the ban doesn’t equate to being satisfied with it as an end result. I look forward to more progress on the issue.

  • Stuart Mitchell 9th Sep '11 - 7:27pm

    Anthony: “Discrimination has nothing to do with this. No one has a right to donate.”

    Totally agree. It’s fundamentally silly to think of this issue as having anything to do with discrimination and equality. Decisions such as this should be made entirely on the basis of scientific evidence.

  • Malcolm Todd 11th Sep '11 - 10:48pm

    “Decisions such as this should be made entirely on the basis of scientific evidence.”

    Of course it should. I presume that there’s some scientific evidence that oral sex between two men is more likely to result in transmission of Hep B than oral sex between a man and a woman?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarCatherine Jane Crosland 23rd Jun - 11:01am
    I was very disappointed to hear that Norman has decided not to stand. I voted for him in the 2015 leadership contest, and would have...
  • User AvatarHuw Dawson 23rd Jun - 11:01am
    The correct position to take - I think most people are just hoping for a good contest at this point. :-)
  • User AvatarBarry 23rd Jun - 10:55am
    Eddie: Thank you. So you favour a criteria based on skill levels, immediate family members, and refugees. All other immigrants should be stopped, forthwith, from...
  • User AvatarElaine Woodard 23rd Jun - 10:53am
    I hope we have a contest but we can't make people stand if they don't want the job. We only have 12 in our pool...
  • User AvatarJohn Barrett 23rd Jun - 10:53am
    Congratulations on your election. You are absolutely right to concentrate on what you have said. If you get distracted by the delights of Westminster, party...
  • User AvatarAndy Hinton 23rd Jun - 10:51am
    I agree with Layla that there should be a contest, so I'm really glad to see this from her.
Sat 1st Jul 2017