Comments on: Peter Riddell on the Lib Dems http://www.libdemvoice.org/peter-riddell-on-the-lib-dems-1605.html Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:46:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dominic http://www.libdemvoice.org/peter-riddell-on-the-lib-dems-1605.html#comment-33426 Dominic Sun, 11 Nov 2007 18:27:56 +0000 http://www.libdemvoice.org/peter-riddell-on-the-lib-dems-1605.html#comment-33426 Thanks Peter - nice to see you are a LDV reader :) Thanks Peter – nice to see you are a LDV reader :)

]]> By: Peter Riddell http://www.libdemvoice.org/peter-riddell-on-the-lib-dems-1605.html#comment-33422 Peter Riddell Sun, 11 Nov 2007 17:17:26 +0000 http://www.libdemvoice.org/peter-riddell-on-the-lib-dems-1605.html#comment-33422 Just to clarify the point about the Populus poll. The Liberal Democrat questions were part of the main monthly poll undertaken on November 2 to 4, of which the main part was published in The Times on Tuesday, November 6. Quite often, we hold back some parts of the poll to publish them later in the week, when we can give them more attention, as we did in this case. Populus then puts the results on its website. Just to clarify the point about the Populus poll. The Liberal Democrat questions were part of the main monthly poll undertaken on November 2 to 4, of which the main part was published in The Times on Tuesday, November 6. Quite often, we hold back some parts of the poll to publish them later in the week, when we can give them more attention, as we did in this case. Populus then puts the results on its website.

]]> By: Andy Mayer http://www.libdemvoice.org/peter-riddell-on-the-lib-dems-1605.html#comment-33282 Andy Mayer Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:34:32 +0000 http://www.libdemvoice.org/peter-riddell-on-the-lib-dems-1605.html#comment-33282 Ooops, obviously they're in the article on the 9th, weird that Populus didn't put them in the press release http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article2836474.ece Ooops, obviously they’re in the article on the 9th, weird that Populus didn’t put them in the press release

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article2836474.ece

]]> By: Andy Mayer http://www.libdemvoice.org/peter-riddell-on-the-lib-dems-1605.html#comment-33281 Andy Mayer Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:31:52 +0000 http://www.libdemvoice.org/peter-riddell-on-the-lib-dems-1605.html#comment-33281 Stephen, the bottom set of figures about the Liberal Democrats are interesting, but are they from a private party poll? The published material here http://www.populus.co.uk/the-times-voting-intention-041107.html appears not to include those questions or figures. Nor do the 3 Times stories about the poll on 6th November. Stephen, the bottom set of figures about the Liberal Democrats are interesting, but are they from a private party poll?

The published material here

http://www.populus.co.uk/the-times-voting-intention-041107.html

appears not to include those questions or figures. Nor do the 3 Times stories about the poll on 6th November.

]]> By: peter http://www.libdemvoice.org/peter-riddell-on-the-lib-dems-1605.html#comment-33280 peter Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:24:02 +0000 http://www.libdemvoice.org/peter-riddell-on-the-lib-dems-1605.html#comment-33280 Well done, Stephen. Quite a good article from Riddell Well done, Stephen. Quite a good article from Riddell

]]>