Pizza entrepreneur’s £775,000 gift to Lib Dems questioned – Telegraph

The Sunday Telegraph reports that “the Liberal Democrats are facing an investigation into one of the party’s largest donors”. Part of the reports reads as follows:

The Electoral Commission has been asked to examine whether £775,000 paid to the Lib Dems by Rumi Verjee, the entrepreneur who brought Domino’s Pizzas to Britain, is an “impermissible donation”.

The payments were made through Brompton Capital Limited, a company with no staff that has not recorded a turnover since 2003.

Mr Verjee dined with Nick Clegg at Chevening, the grace and favour mansion in Kent used by the Lib Dem leader, a month after the second £250,000 donation was paid in May last year.

A Labour MP has written to the Electoral Commission urging the watchdog to investigate whether Brompton is a “permissible donor” and whether the Lib Dems carried out adequate checks when accepting the money.

…Last night the Lib Dems said Brompton’s donations complied with the law and that it carried out the appropriate checks. However, their defence raised fresh questions, as the party cited Brompton’s development of a London property early last decade as evidence it was an valid company.

“Brompton Capital’s donations to the Liberal Democrats have been fully checked by the party for permissibility and the company meets every requirement,” a party spokesman said.

“Each donation has also been fully checked for permissibility by the Electoral Commission. Brompton Capital is a permissible donor and any suggestion otherwise is completely untrue.

“It is a legitimate UK company which has undertaken major projects such as the development of the Old Brompton hospital, paying full UK tax.

“The company has sought numerous other development schemes in the UK and continues to do so. We are therefore satisfied that the company carries on a business in accordance with The Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000.”

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/32331 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

9 Comments

  • Why would someone donate £775,000 to a political party? How do we know that the donor does not want something in return? Why should very wealthy people be allowed to fund political parties in this way?

  • @Ed Shepherd:

    “Why would someone donate £775,000 to a political party? ?”

    Sometimes it is because they genuinely wish to support the forces of political change. Sometimes it is because they want to hob nob with the ruling elite. And sometimes they just want ‘a pizza the action’. :-)

  • Why did Zac Goldsmith give the Green Party money, why do trades unions fund the Labour Party. “Should very wealthy people be allowed to fund political parties in this way?” NO!

  • Richard Dean 23rd Dec '12 - 12:00pm

    Why is there anything at all inherently wrong in wealthy people, unions, or other organizations funding political parties? Why should it always be the poor that pays?

    In this democracy, representatives get elected on the basis of one person one vote. A donor’s wealth or absence theoreof doesn’t affect that equivalence at all.

  • We did once return a large donation from Mohammed Fayed. Was that because he failed due diligence, or just because we didn’t like him?

  • @Alex – probably because we realised he was mental.

  • “I suspect that, if the Party was obliged to return the money, he’d just donate it by some other route.”

    If the donation were found to be impermissible, it would be forfeited, not returned to the donor.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAndrew 25th May - 1:29am
    TCO Child centred learning came in in the 1960's in the wake of the Plowden report (which did many good things like nursery education as...
  • User AvatarAndrew 25th May - 1:04am
    I am afraid that the criticism of grammar schools on the basis of wealth and privileged applies in spades to comprehensive schools, and always has....
  • User AvatarJane Ann Liston 25th May - 12:53am
    Gosh, Jennie, how glad I am that I'm not a Twit! Can't you de-tweet these nasty Nats? I agree with Willie Rennie.
  • User AvatarTonyJ 25th May - 12:48am
    Agreed. Apart from anything else, this is a public forum, so anyone can see what you say. Tough questions, challenging opinions, even harsh judgements -...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 25th May - 12:06am
    Hi Jennie. I suppose at first I didn't realise the liar tag was at stake again, but I still feel a general lack of consideration...
  • User AvatarTCO 24th May - 11:44pm
    @Andrew spooky ... I've just done a you gov where the first questions were those grammar school questions. I understand your point about successful schools...
Mon 25th May 2015
12:05
Tue 26th May 2015
Wed 27th May 2015
Thu 28th May 2015
Fri 29th May 2015
19:30
Sat 30th May 2015
Sun 31st May 2015
Mon 1st Jun 2015
Wed 3rd Jun 2015
Thu 4th Jun 2015
Sat 6th Jun 2015
Wed 10th Jun 2015
Thu 11th Jun 2015
19:00
Fri 12th Jun 2015
Sat 13th Jun 2015
Wed 17th Jun 2015
Thu 18th Jun 2015
Sat 20th Jun 2015
Sun 21st Jun 2015