PM U-turn on #MPexpenses

Surprising turn of events reported in the Guardian:

Gordon Brown today retreated from plans to exempt MPs’ expenses from the Freedom of Information Act.

The surprise announcement made during prime ministers questions follows the collapse overnight of a bipartisan agreement between Brown and David Cameron, the Tory leader, to back a parliamentary order exempting MPs’ expenses from the act. The move came after he was challenged by a Tory backbencher over why he was in favour of keeping them secret.

It means that plans to issue 1.2m receipts for MPs’ expenses over the past three years are likely to go ahead within weeks.

The decision is a major victory for freedom of information campaigners and follows growing opposition led by the Liberal Democrats to the proposal, and website campaigns urging the public to email their MP objecting to the move.

Whilst we of course welcome the outcome – no special measures for MPs – we can’t help but be puzzled by the background hinted at in the report.  Bipartisan agreement?  Have the Tories reneged in the face of public opinion?  Was our own leadership consulted?  Who knew what and when?  Is it time to rename the hashtag from #MPexpenses to #Expensesgate ?

Our extensive coverage of this issue is all available under the #MPexpenses tag – click the link below for more information.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Advert

7 Comments

  • Alix Mortimer 21st Jan '09 - 1:24pm

    Oh bother! We’ve cross-posted. I’ll take mine off (huh, mine had a free cup of tea for every reader).

  • From the Beeb:

    Earlier, Mr Brown blamed the Conservatives for what he said was a breakdown of a consensus over the way forward. “We thought we had agreement on the FOI Act as part of this wider package,” he told MPs. “Recently that support that we believed we had from the main opposition party was withdrawn. So on this particular matter, I believe all-party support is important and we will continue to consult on that matter.”

    As if “Tories collude” = “all-party support”.

  • What time is the remaining vote tomorrow?

  • Alix Mortimer 21st Jan '09 - 3:30pm

    It’s the morning (10.30) session, and FOI is the fourth item of six. Why, do you smell a rat?

    http://services.parliament.uk/calendar/2009/01/22/events.html

  • No rat, just wanted to know! Cheers. 😉

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarTCO 26th May - 3:10pm
    Is he from the House of Orange (Book)?
  • User AvatarRoland 26th May - 2:51pm
    Michael "I think that the first uses are likely to be public transport/taxi like applications – a taxi but without the expense of drivers." Well...
  • User AvatarThe Professor 26th May - 2:42pm
    As a software developer I am fully aware that the leading edge technology soon becomes the bleeding edge technology. So let Google explore all the...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 26th May - 2:26pm
    Squabbles between public schoolboy toffs - and shouts of "fight, fight" from small fry who hold their coats are of little relevance in the real...
  • User AvatarDavid Faggiani 26th May - 2:10pm
    I like the approach this article takes, one of identifying a goal (Basic Income) and then setting out policy steps to get closer to it....
  • User AvatarRoland 26th May - 2:10pm
    @Tobi - sorry, my point was the existing measures and incentives and supportive government words, seem to be sufficient to encourage technology R&D investment into...