Comments on: Police investigation into Ealing Southall postal votes ‘leak’ http://www.libdemvoice.org/police-investigation-into-ealing-southall-postal-votes-%e2%80%98leak%e2%80%99-1042.html Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:55:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Anonymous http://www.libdemvoice.org/police-investigation-into-ealing-southall-postal-votes-%e2%80%98leak%e2%80%99-1042.html#comment-24138 Anonymous Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:39:06 +0000 http://www.libdemvoice.org/police-investigation-into-ealing-southall-postal-votes-%e2%80%98leak%e2%80%99-1042.html#comment-24138 The article is still available if you look in Google's cached pages. The article is still available if you look in Google’s cached pages.

]]> By: Simon http://www.libdemvoice.org/police-investigation-into-ealing-southall-postal-votes-%e2%80%98leak%e2%80%99-1042.html#comment-24137 Simon Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:25:25 +0000 http://www.libdemvoice.org/police-investigation-into-ealing-southall-postal-votes-%e2%80%98leak%e2%80%99-1042.html#comment-24137 Whether the figures were made up or not I hope the police take this blatant breach of election law seriously. Whether the figures were made up or not I hope the police take this blatant breach of election law seriously.

]]> By: Edis http://www.libdemvoice.org/police-investigation-into-ealing-southall-postal-votes-%e2%80%98leak%e2%80%99-1042.html#comment-24111 Edis Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:54:21 +0000 http://www.libdemvoice.org/police-investigation-into-ealing-southall-postal-votes-%e2%80%98leak%e2%80%99-1042.html#comment-24111 Also any fule kno that it is virtually impossible to get an accurate subjective impression of the postal vote proportions on a long ballot paper as anyone who has attended a postal papers verification session could tell you. My suspicion, this was a bit of attempted media manipulation by someone who made figures up and simply didnt understand the consequences of such imaginative talk. A total incompetent at election management then. Er, that offers no alibis for the Tory team then... Also any fule kno that it is virtually impossible to get an accurate subjective impression of the postal vote proportions on a long ballot paper as anyone who has attended a postal papers verification session could tell you. My suspicion, this was a bit of attempted media manipulation by someone who made figures up and simply didnt understand the consequences of such imaginative talk. A total incompetent at election management then. Er, that offers no alibis for the Tory team then…

]]> By: Unity http://www.libdemvoice.org/police-investigation-into-ealing-southall-postal-votes-%e2%80%98leak%e2%80%99-1042.html#comment-24071 Unity Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:03:12 +0000 http://www.libdemvoice.org/police-investigation-into-ealing-southall-postal-votes-%e2%80%98leak%e2%80%99-1042.html#comment-24071 <a href="http://www.ministryoftruth.org.uk/2007/07/19/exclusive-second-national-newspaper-breaches-electoral-law/" rel="nofollow">*cough* </a> Indy caught at it in their print edition. *cough*

Indy caught at it in their print edition.

]]> By: Mark Pack http://www.libdemvoice.org/police-investigation-into-ealing-southall-postal-votes-%e2%80%98leak%e2%80%99-1042.html#comment-24040 Mark Pack Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:00:46 +0000 http://www.libdemvoice.org/police-investigation-into-ealing-southall-postal-votes-%e2%80%98leak%e2%80%99-1042.html#comment-24040 I saw the story before it was pulled, and it said the figures came from a source in the Conservative camp. I saw the story before it was pulled, and it said the figures came from a source in the Conservative camp.

]]> By: James Graham http://www.libdemvoice.org/police-investigation-into-ealing-southall-postal-votes-%e2%80%98leak%e2%80%99-1042.html#comment-23999 James Graham Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:35:18 +0000 http://www.libdemvoice.org/police-investigation-into-ealing-southall-postal-votes-%e2%80%98leak%e2%80%99-1042.html#comment-23999 Let me guess, the Tory source has the Tories leading by a majority of 1234? Let me guess, the Tory source has the Tories leading by a majority of 1234?

]]>