Praise for Nick Clegg and Liberal Democrats from both sides – should we be worried?

I remember hearing Nick Clegg saying that if he was being attacked from both left and right, then he felt reassured that he was doing something right. He may be feeling slightly worried now, as there have been a couple of not entirely unpleasant pieces in the New Statesman and Daily Telegraph in the last few days.

From the left, we have Rafael Behr, the political editor of the New Statesman, arguing that it’s Nick Clegg, not Nigel Farage, who has shaken up Westminster:

For Lib Dems, the distinction is between two styles of politics. There is the managerial one, laden with compromise, made necessary by coalition. Or there is the chase after protest votes and none-of-the-above outrage that they know well but had to abandon on entering government. Add a history of being pro-European, relaxed about immigration and socially liberal and Clegg starts to look like the anti-Farage – a weary denier of popular solutions. “As a country, do we want the fantasy ‘close your eyes and wish it all away’ offer from Grinning Nigel?” is how one senior Lib Dem strategist puts it. “Or do we want serious, centrist government?”

Of course as Nigel Lindsay pointed out the other day, this party of protest stuff is absolute nonsense. Parties of protest don’t effectively run councils the length of the country, introduce free personal care and fair votes for local government. But the point that it’s the Liberal Democrats are the only party with the heart and mindset  to stand up to Farage and the half truth and hyperbole he and both Conservative and Labour parties propagate on issues like immigration is a valid one.

Over on the right, we have Peter Oborne, who, let’s not forget, predicted the demise of the coalition during 2013, saying that the Queen’s Speech was brilliant because of the emphasis on personal saving. Steve Webb was singled out for praise for his pensions reform.

Now Steve Webb, his pensions minister (an unassuming Liberal Democrat who has turned into one of the outstanding ministerial successes of this government) is taking an axe to the Brown system. Just as Mr Duncan Smith’s Universal Credit will make it impossible to lose out financially by returning to work, so Mr Webb’s pension reforms will guarantee that those who do the right thing and save are not then hammered by the state.

There are deep flaws with both articles, but their absence of bile is unusual.

Before we get too worried, though, Quentin Letts has made his earlier attacks on Nick Clegg and Miriam Gonzalez Durantez look like love poetry in an extraordinary article, tinged with racism in today’s Daily Mail. If you want to read it, you’ll have to find it for yourselves as I’m not linking to it. This is not an exhaustive list, but here are just some of the outrageously ill-judged comments he makes:

  • referring to Miriam Gonzalez Durantez as a “castanet clacker” and slipping in a reference to “half Dutch” Clegg;
  • attacking Nick’s atheism, saying he “is not a man troubled by thoughts of how he may some day be judged”. What’s that thing happening in May 2015, again?;
  • having a go because he has a nice Whitehall Office and use of a country house. I hadn’t noticed Tory ministers working out of leaky portakabins in Whitehall, nor William Hague, who shares use of Chevening with Clegg, sleeping in a tent in the garden;

There’s also all manner of complete hogwash about feelings within the party. Nobody could describe the direct speech he gave to the Conference rally in March, in which he made clear his determination to change the party’s culture, as “old style chauvinism.”

If anything, though, his article demonstrates the irritation of many on the right with the way Clegg has stopped the Conservatives from implementing some of their dafter policies.  My view of the Queen’s Speech the other day was that the things the Liberal Democrats were mainly responsible for helped a broad section of people such as consumers, pensioners, parents and people who use the internet, while those that the Conservatives initiated were pandering to narrow prejudice. Quentin Letts’ intemperate, blinkered and discriminatory rant shows that he knows that Clegg has developed an effective competence in office and is stopping Letts’ favourites from doing their worst.

* Caron Lindsay is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/34479 for Twitter and emails.

8 Comments

  • In the sad case of Quentin Letts’ attack on Nick Clegg’s atheism, if he is a believer then he will accept that he will have to account for himself in front of his maker for his dishonesty and lack of charity for personal gain. If he is not a believer then he is a whited sepulchre (using his Bible’s phrase) and maybe that makes him rather worse for accusing someone of something that he himself does. But then both presuppose that Mr Letts has some integrity and as far as can be ascertained he cannot be accused of that.

  • Tony Dawson 11th May '13 - 1:54pm

    “Quentin Letts’ intemperate, blinkered and discriminatory rant shows that he knows that Clegg has developed an effective competence in office”

    Like it shows that our leader is an Olympic athlete, a champion chess player and an artist who knows no bounds.

    It just shows that Letts is a very nasty person indeed. Surprising news. anyone?

  • A very good article.

  • I expect nothing but rubbish to be the result of Letts’ latest use of a keyboard, but to so blithley say that those of us who don’t believe in God essentially don’t care what we do to others makes perfectly clear that Letts’ world view is so utterly blinkered he might as well be called Dobbin.

    After Letts’ robust insight into the morality of a non-believer, if I ever say anything nice, be helpful or show any humanity at all then be assured I don’t mean it. Human decency, it seems, its just beyond my ability.

    Oh, the irony, Being told I lack human decency by the Daily Mail.

  • Tony Dawson 11th May '13 - 6:36pm

    @ATF 11th May:

    “I expect nothing but rubbish to be the result of Letts’ latest use of a keyboard”

    Apparently, if you put Quentin Letts in front of a keyboard for 100 years, he would come up with the Complete works of a chimpanzee. :-)

  • Nigel Lindsay was all over the shop, attacking from both right and left.

    So even while I agree with the conclusion of this post, some of the sources are not quite the evidence described.

  • A Daily Mail journalist accusing others of chauvinism but taking that papers pay surely comes rather close to the differentiation of irony?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter 30th Sep - 6:48pm
    I've just checked the UK average wage. It looks as though Ms Lindsay's plan is to have average wage earners (and of course the 50%...
  • User AvatarPeter 30th Sep - 6:31pm
    @ jedibeeftrix Well said, but if I may point out that Ms Lindsay is insisting that capping the benefit is a disgrace. That means that...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 30th Sep - 6:19pm
    David Allen You ask this question ---" .....are you not at risk of making your own value judgment as to which “people” you wish to...
  • User AvatarGlenn Andrews 30th Sep - 6:12pm
    In his zeal this IDS chap looked one step away from appearing on stage in a twin set and pearls with a penguin glove puppet...
  • User Avatarjohnmc 30th Sep - 6:11pm
    Why is the benefits cap wrong in the first place, and why ought it not to decrease if circumstances require, (as average earnings have)? Even...
  • User Avatarjedibeeftrix 30th Sep - 6:10pm
    @ AndrewR - "If you earn that little it’s doubtful you’re even covering your own cost to the state never mind paying for anyone else."...