Q. How many Liberal Democrats does it take to change a lightbulb?

A. One. They stand perfectly still, hold the lightbulb in the socket and wait for the earth to revolve around them.*

So the world turns and yet another long-held Lib Dem policy edges its way further towards the mainstream…

Yesterday the cross-parliamentary Committee for Climate Change made a recommendation to the squeaky new Minister for Energy and Climate Change Ed Miliband that CO2 emissions be cut to 80% of 1990 levels by the middle of the century, rather than the 60% being proposed in the forthcoming Climate Change Bill.

The Liberal Democrat aim, as any fule kno, is to make Britain entirely carbon-free by 2050, with the Green Tax Switch laying the vital ground work. Our tabled amendment to the Climate Change Bill happens to also raise the target for CO2 emission cuts to 80%, but if Miliband is as willing to lap up the CCC report as the Guardian editorial seems to think, perhaps it won’t be needed.

But a target, as the editorial points out, is one thing, and taking the practical steps to achieve it is another. The notion that markets can drive CO2 reductions if the incentives are pointing the right way is not, to my mind, as busted as the editorial simplistically claims. Incentives do work as effectively in a recession as out of one (that’s why they’re called incentives) – they’re just likely to look different. It’s rather silly to suggest that a market in a downturn can’t achieve anything – it’s “achieving” plenty, isn’t it. You just need different incentives, and non-contradictory ones, created across the board of government operations. Like, er, ooh, I know, the Green Tax Switch!

As Steve Webb puts it:

It will be interesting to see if the new department takes over the remaining stages of the Climate Change Bill and accepts our amendment to toughen it up. Perhaps at long last energy efficiency will be taken seriously instead of being a cinderella.

All we need to do now is include transport, building standards, green taxation in the Department’s remit and we might be getting somewhere!

* Wouldn’t work for bayonets, of course. But it’s the principle of the thing.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Alix Mortimer 8th Oct '08 - 4:29pm

    Well, quite. A bayonet fitting would require the answer to be: “They stand perfectly still, hold the lightbulb in the socket and wait for the earth to revolve around them a bit, then cheat to the left slightly and do a little wiggle.”

    I’ve also realised that there are profound practical difficulties with my assertion that Britain should be a carbon-free place by 2050. Ho well.

  • How many Politicians should it take to change a light bulb?
    None.

    How many Citizens should be allowed to choose?
    Everyone.

    (from http://ceolas.net/
    against the ban on incandescent light bulbs, final words)

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael BG 20th Jan - 1:00am
    @ matt I note you have responded to my facts with your beliefs. I can only state the facts and hope they will change your...
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 20th Jan - 12:31am
    Duncan Brack, please tell ordinary members like myself more about how the Federal Policy Committee decides on topics for Federal Conference. I am rather confused....
  • User AvatarMark Goodrich 20th Jan - 12:19am
    Final comment on the polling. There really is some interesting conclusions in the detailed numbers. Despite support for the negotiating objectives, people think leaving the...
  • User AvatarDavid Pocock 20th Jan - 12:17am
    I'm glad to see it is being taken seriously. I feel the party has the right principles in this area; for way too long the...
  • User AvatarJennie Rigg 20th Jan - 12:12am
    Thanks for that diplomatic response, Duncan. I'm glad to see that LDV has corrected the spelling errors that were in earlier drafts of this report...
  • User AvatarMark Goodrich 20th Jan - 12:08am
    On the post May speech, YouGov polling, I would have expected initial support and a bounce. The speech was well delivered, I think there was...