Review of Bristol elections calls for widespread changes

Confidence in the administration of elections by Bristol Council was badly shaken this May after a series of problems, including ballot papers found in the wrong place, election results taking 6 hours longer than expected to be declared and numerous phone calls going unanswered. A detailed review of electoral administration was subsequently ordered and it has called for major changes.

The Bristol Evening Post reported,

Apart from more than half of the election phone queries going unanswered, the office for the council’s electoral services department in the Corn Exchange has been described as “woefully inadequate”. One of Ms Dixon’s many recommendations to the council is to find alternative accommodation.

Then we come to the poll cards, a total of 500,000 of which were distributed to households for the general and local elections.

It is not essential to take your polling card with you when you vote although it does help. Nonetheless, Ms Dixon discovered that 1,373 poll cards in the Bristol West constituency were not printed. This was due to human error when a sequence number was incorrectly entered on a print run.

On postal voting, a number of problems occurred. On April 23, 2,381 Bristol East postal ballot papers were sent to voters in Bristol West by mistake. This led to checks which discovered that parliamentary postal ballot papers had also been issued incorrectly in Knowle ward because Bristol East papers had been wrongly packed for Bristol South.

The reason for this glitch was apparently due to a software problem. A constituency boundary change which had been correctly entered into the software did not follow through to the printing of the ballot papers. Another of Ms Dixon’s recommendations is an updating of the software programme…

When the postal votes were opened and checked, the problems really began to take off, thanks to postal votes being put into the wrong ballot boxes. This led to discrepancies in ballot paper totals and votes being “lost” and then “found”.

Among the blunders were:

● 165 Bishopston postal votes placed in a Bishopsworth ballot box.

● 225 Postal votes in Brislington East were mixed up with a ballot box for Brislington West.

● postal votes in Bristol North West were incorrectly put into a ballot box for Henleaze.

● the discovery of 685 ballot papers for Bishopsworth in the Bedminster box.

Ms Dixon said there was “a strong perception of lack of transparency in the process of moving ballot papers through the process”.

“Although verbal briefings took place, it seemed that many candidates and agents had little or no information as to why packets of votes were arriving and being added in at a late stage,” said Ms Dixon.

“This lack of transparency and communication led to descriptions of votes being ‘lost’ and then ‘found’, which although incorrect, gained currency as a description of events.”

During the parliamentary counts, the main bone of contention was the length of time taken before results were declared. People complained as count staff were “sitting doing nothing” leading to the conclusion that management was poor and that resources were not being fully utilised to enable speedy progress.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Election law.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/20689 for Twitter and emails.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 28th Jul - 1:19pm
    bcrombie Wasn’t this one of the problems in 2010 – the campaign had appeared to a lot of voters more left-wing than right-wing but in...
  • User AvatarJoe Otten 28th Jul - 1:12pm
    Certainly every country is different, and may have a different sweet spot, but that is not to say a sweet spot doesn't exist. That would...
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 28th Jul - 12:58pm
    Stuart, nowhere in that paper did it say that armed Police officers would be casually strolling into sleepy Highland bakers' shops. This was a fundamental...
  • User AvatarJoe Bailey 28th Jul - 12:57pm
    Simon Shaw27th Jul '14 - 4:13pm Although my main reason for opposing us entering any coalition in 2015 is the damage I think it would...
  • User AvatarDai 28th Jul - 12:51pm
    Pretty much every vote (apart from the single vote on Lithuanaia and the Euro, which has very little to do with the UK) has been...
  • User AvatarStephen Hesketh 28th Jul - 12:50pm
    Eddie Sammon28th Jul '14 - 4:17am etc "Simon, it’s nothing personal and my problem isn’t with everyone who signed “Lib Dems 4 Change”. I don’t...