<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ros Scott writes … Party President’s report to members, January &#8217;10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/ros-scott-writes-party-presidents-report-to-members-january-10-17798.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ros-scott-writes-party-presidents-report-to-members-january-10-17798.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Page</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ros-scott-writes-party-presidents-report-to-members-january-10-17798.html#comment-106694</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=17798#comment-106694</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t expect this question to get answered any more than it has been answered in the past, but is there any chance that our candidates, campaigners, SAOs etc. can have a glimpse of this &quot;business plan&quot;?

Large chunks of the party work without any reference to or involvement with Cowley Street, with attempts to get involved with the &quot;main party&quot; being ignored. It&#039;s a little disheartening to read Ros&#039; reports which talk about more centralisation of unattributable power in the Chief Officer&#039;s Group as a result of the undemocratic Bones stitch-up, when there are party bodies with thousands of pounds to spend and dozens of activists who can&#039;t get any dialogue going about how best to target those resources for the good of the party!

It seems to me that Ros has comprehensively failed on her self-imposed remit to act as an interface between the membership and Cowley Street.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t expect this question to get answered any more than it has been answered in the past, but is there any chance that our candidates, campaigners, SAOs etc. can have a glimpse of this &#8220;business plan&#8221;?</p>
<p>Large chunks of the party work without any reference to or involvement with Cowley Street, with attempts to get involved with the &#8220;main party&#8221; being ignored. It&#8217;s a little disheartening to read Ros&#8217; reports which talk about more centralisation of unattributable power in the Chief Officer&#8217;s Group as a result of the undemocratic Bones stitch-up, when there are party bodies with thousands of pounds to spend and dozens of activists who can&#8217;t get any dialogue going about how best to target those resources for the good of the party!</p>
<p>It seems to me that Ros has comprehensively failed on her self-imposed remit to act as an interface between the membership and Cowley Street.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

