Is the government’s crackdown on tax avoidance working?

Interesting news via The Times over the weekend [£]:

Britain’s only listed accountancy firm is to close its specialist tax division in a move that will be regarded as another victory for Revenue & Customs against tax avoidance by the rich.

RSM Tenon said yesterday that it would stop offering products through its Premier Strategies division because recent moves by the Government to clamp down on what it perceives as aggressive tax avoidance had made the tax planning business too difficult and risky. Chris Merry, Tenon’s chief executive, said: “The market for specialist tax has changed dramatically over the past few years as the Government has tightened legislation. Tailored tax-saving products have in the past had a strong audience, but have become much more difficult to offer.”

The follows up a regular Liberal Democrat theme in government, as Prateek Buch blogged about on this site in January:

The Voice’s Mark Pack has been writing about the Party’s challenges in 2012 – as if on cue, leader Nick Clegg set out his priorities for Lib Dems in Government in a Radio 4 Today interview which you can hear in full here.

As reported in The Guardian, these priorities include tackling tax avoidance by both corporations and wealthy individuals, clamping down on excessive and undeserved top pay, and re-engaging with governments and business in Europe following the Prime Minister’s unhelpful showing in Brussels at the end of last year…

There were encouraging words for those of us who want this Government to take a stronger line on the unfair exploitation of complicated loopholes in the tax system. Nick made it clear that Lib Dems were seeking to implement measures that would amount to a General Anti-Abuse Rule (GAAR), as recommended by Graham Aaronson in a report for the Treasury. It’s probably not surprising, as The Voice previously suggested, that a GAAR along the lines that Aaronson proposes would be more narrowly focussed than an anti-avoidance rule, but it would nonetheless go some way to making it harder for companies and wealthy individuals to ‘play the system’ and avoid paying their fair share of taxes – which as Lib Dem MP Stephen Williams’ Early Day Motionsuggests, is the ultimate aim of such measures. Coupled with lifting the personal income tax allowance yet further, the idea is to shift the ensure the tax system is fair and transparent.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/28614 for Twitter and emails.

2 Comments

  • Keith Browning 21st May '12 - 2:22pm

    Bank managers and bankers generally used to be the most decent, honourable people imaginable, the pillar of the local community and of the City of London. So where is the morality and common decency in both inventing and then managing a system to cheat the country and its citizens.

    ‘Daddy, daddy, what do you do at work?’

    ‘I help people hide their money so the government can’t take it away from them. ‘

    ‘Why does the government need money Daddy?’

    ‘To buy things for all the poor people’.

    ‘Are we poor Daddy?’

    ‘The government thinks we are because Daddy has kept your inheritance somewhere safe, where the government cant touch it.’

    ‘That’s enough questions son, the helicopter is waiting to take you back to Christchurch for your PPE seminar.’

  • Is the government actually going to walk the talk and bring NewBuy back onshore?

    “The [New Buy] scheme will operate through a Guernsey-based insurance company which HBF will own on behalf of the participants.”
    [Source: http://www.hbf.co.uk/fileadmin/documents/briefings/HBF_Member_Briefing_NewBuy_21.02.12.pdf

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 22nd Oct - 2:25am
    It's a good article, but the banks are whooping most areas in society when it comes to promoting immigration and race equality, so there was...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 22nd Oct - 2:10am
    I agree too. The polarization that is evident in Nick's choices, and reactively (I suppose) in this article's headline, does no electoral good whatsoever.
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 22nd Oct - 2:03am
    I wonder if Peter Hayes's experience tells more about LibDems that immigrants. It seems like he's saying that they're ok if they serve you well,...
  • User AvatarSue Doughty 22nd Oct - 1:29am
    Tony Greaves is right about the democratic deficit (and yes, it is totally unfair to attack him because he is in the Lords - rather...
  • User AvatarSteve Way 22nd Oct - 12:39am
    @Psi Not sure where my comment says that it shouldn't be done? It should have been done earlier, that would have been the right thing....
  • User AvatarRoland 22nd Oct - 12:38am
    "I had the misfortune of staying in a Travel Lodge, breakfast was in a greasy spoon ‘restaurant’ staff were English and did not care, compare...