Is the government’s crackdown on tax avoidance working?

Interesting news via The Times over the weekend [£]:

Britain’s only listed accountancy firm is to close its specialist tax division in a move that will be regarded as another victory for Revenue & Customs against tax avoidance by the rich.

RSM Tenon said yesterday that it would stop offering products through its Premier Strategies division because recent moves by the Government to clamp down on what it perceives as aggressive tax avoidance had made the tax planning business too difficult and risky. Chris Merry, Tenon’s chief executive, said: “The market for specialist tax has changed dramatically over the past few years as the Government has tightened legislation. Tailored tax-saving products have in the past had a strong audience, but have become much more difficult to offer.”

The follows up a regular Liberal Democrat theme in government, as Prateek Buch blogged about on this site in January:

The Voice’s Mark Pack has been writing about the Party’s challenges in 2012 – as if on cue, leader Nick Clegg set out his priorities for Lib Dems in Government in a Radio 4 Today interview which you can hear in full here.

As reported in The Guardian, these priorities include tackling tax avoidance by both corporations and wealthy individuals, clamping down on excessive and undeserved top pay, and re-engaging with governments and business in Europe following the Prime Minister’s unhelpful showing in Brussels at the end of last year…

There were encouraging words for those of us who want this Government to take a stronger line on the unfair exploitation of complicated loopholes in the tax system. Nick made it clear that Lib Dems were seeking to implement measures that would amount to a General Anti-Abuse Rule (GAAR), as recommended by Graham Aaronson in a report for the Treasury. It’s probably not surprising, as The Voice previously suggested, that a GAAR along the lines that Aaronson proposes would be more narrowly focussed than an anti-avoidance rule, but it would nonetheless go some way to making it harder for companies and wealthy individuals to ‘play the system’ and avoid paying their fair share of taxes – which as Lib Dem MP Stephen Williams’ Early Day Motionsuggests, is the ultimate aim of such measures. Coupled with lifting the personal income tax allowance yet further, the idea is to shift the ensure the tax system is fair and transparent.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/28614 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Keith Browning 21st May '12 - 2:22pm

    Bank managers and bankers generally used to be the most decent, honourable people imaginable, the pillar of the local community and of the City of London. So where is the morality and common decency in both inventing and then managing a system to cheat the country and its citizens.

    ‘Daddy, daddy, what do you do at work?’

    ‘I help people hide their money so the government can’t take it away from them. ‘

    ‘Why does the government need money Daddy?’

    ‘To buy things for all the poor people’.

    ‘Are we poor Daddy?’

    ‘The government thinks we are because Daddy has kept your inheritance somewhere safe, where the government cant touch it.’

    ‘That’s enough questions son, the helicopter is waiting to take you back to Christchurch for your PPE seminar.’

  • Is the government actually going to walk the talk and bring NewBuy back onshore?

    “The [New Buy] scheme will operate through a Guernsey-based insurance company which HBF will own on behalf of the participants.”
    [Source: http://www.hbf.co.uk/fileadmin/documents/briefings/HBF_Member_Briefing_NewBuy_21.02.12.pdf

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Evans 19th Apr - 11:38am
    BigMac - Sadly the argument using the 75% of the manifesto delivered as a measure of our success has been comprehensively debunked many times since...
  • User AvatarSteve Way 19th Apr - 11:09am
    Slightly off topic, but too many people see disagreeing with the leadership's management of the coalition with disagreeing with the necessity of it. I think...
  • User Avatarexpats 19th Apr - 11:06am
    BigMak 19th Apr '15 - 9:46am........Now we have according to an independent review had 75% of our 2010 manifesto enacted…. And that attitude, dear reader,...
  • User AvatarSteve Way 19th Apr - 11:03am
    @Phillip Thomas That would be dishonest, at the moment I teeter between Lib Dem and deliberately spoilt ballot...I will consider donating to Charles though Caron..
  • User Avatarexpats 19th Apr - 11:02am
    Sesenco 18th Apr '15 - 10:49pm ........The Labourites who never tire of telling us how much they hate us, some of them are going to...
  • User Avatarmalc 19th Apr - 10:45am
    BigMak I disagree totally. The LibDems would have won at least as many seats in 2010 with CK as leader and then could have joined...
Sat 25th Apr 2015