Scotland’s Day of Destiny clashes with 2014 Federal Conference

Scotland’s First Minister Alex Salmond announced today that the Independence Referendum would be held on 18th September 2014.  Three and a half years of preparation and campaigning will come to an end and Scotland will decide whether its future lies within the UK or out of it. At the moment, the polls are looking pretty good for staying in the Union, but that is no cause for complacency. Every vote will have to be fought for across the whole country. It will be a very different sort of campaign.

You would think, wouldn’t you, that when you were deciding on a date like that, you would check out that there was nothing else going on at the time? Like a major party political conference, for example. My first reaction when I heard the date was “When’s Federal Conference?” Sal Brinton confirmed on Twitter that it’s expected to be in Liverpool from 13-17 September.

Faced with that choice, Scots will have to stay in Scotland but that is not without its problems. Someone pointed out on Twitter that there could be election expenses implications if anyone mentions the Referendum publicly at the Conference. And will the Nationalists make a fuss if the BBC covers any of the Conference in Scotland? It will mean that Scottish Liberal Democrats don’t get to vote on the elements of the Manifesto for the 2015 election which will no doubt contain plans for further powers for the Scottish Parliament after a “no” vote. It is far from ideal and probably a lot more complicated than we yet realise.

It is pretty disrespectful on the part of the SNP not to have considered this. They might not think some conference in England is important, but the fact is that many Scots have strong ties south of the Border and these things do matter to them.

It’s unlikely that the Referendum date will change, especially as the SNP Government has an overall majority at Holyrood. Liberal Democrat, Conservative and Labour conferences are always held back to back and are agreed years in advance and venues secured. Whether they meant to or not, the net result is that the SNP has created some inconvenience for our party. We’ll sort it out, but it’s annoying that we have been put in this position.

We will just get on with it, but it’s worth pointing out that if we had done this to the SNP, they would have been in every single television studio squealing outrage.

The most important thing, though, is that we get the issues properly debated. It’s really important to show that being part of the UK really does give Scotland the best of both worlds. We know that Alex Salmond has been irresponsibly vague on whether he had legal advice on Scotland’s future EU membership. We’ve had a leaked report by the Finance Minister which suggests uncertainty over Scotland’s future oil revenues being over-ridden days later by the First Minster proclaiming that there would be an oil boom as I told you last week.   If they carry on like this, there’ll be more truth in Grimm’s Fairy Tales than in the Yes Scotland manifesto come the referendum.

Liberal Democrat Secretary of State for Scotland Michael Moore told Scottish Conference this weekend that the SNP had deliberately twisted facts to suit their case, that they had chosen Independence Day even before they had announced the day we’d have to make our choice. The SNP claim that, in the event of a Yes vote they will be able to have all the arrangements for independence finalised by March 2016. That will involve getting all 27 EU member states to agree to admit an independent Scotland and would require speedier negotiations than the EU has ever shown itself capable of. If they are going to do it that quickly, what are they prepared to sacrifice in our name? Today, as the date was announced, Moore had this to say:

I am glad people in Scotland have now been told the proposed date for the referendum.
The debate about Scotland’s future has already begun and will only intensify, and that is something I look forward to.
I am confident when Scots go to the polls they will vote in favour of Scotland staying within a strong and secure UK family.

I shall be doing all I possibly can to make sure that they do just that.

* Caron Lindsay is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/33800 for Twitter and emails.

22 Comments

  • I don’t understand your surprise, why do you imagine for a second the SNP would chose a date that was convenient for its opponents?

  • Simon McGrath 21st Mar '13 - 6:01pm

    This is another excellent reason why conference needs be brought into the internet age, with people having the ability to attend , speak and vote remotely : otherwise Scottish delegates will be deprived of the opportunity to vote on some key issues.

  • Caron – I realise that politics is about getting outcomes, but it is right that nations can self-determine, and at least the SNP permitted the question to be asked. I very much doubt that the LD conference even crossed their minds.

    Simon – absolutely agree, the party needs to modernise its internal democracy with great urgency.

  • Kevin Donnelly 21st Mar '13 - 8:52pm

    Am sure Caron is being perfectly serious, but come on, just how ridiculous does this make the LibDems look.

    LOL

  • Gavin Alexander 21st Mar '13 - 9:58pm

    Your conference is on 13-17 September? Why can’t you just head back north on the 18th and vote? What’s the problem?

    And why would the SNP be any more likely than any other party to squeal? Is this article not just a squeal?…

  • I quote: ” The most important thing, though, is that we get the issues properly debated.”
    When will the LibDems actually start participating in a proper debate? There’s no sign of any engagment to date, nor any sign of willingness to separate the facts from pro-union propaganda. Well, when will you debate properly, honestly & fairly?

  • Alison George 22nd Mar '13 - 12:12am

    “Your conference is on 13-17 September? Why can’t you just head back north on the 18th and vote? What’s the problem?”

    Apparently Liverpool is located somewhere in rural China.

  • Gordon Bain 22nd Mar '13 - 6:02am

    So somebody heard on Twitter that your conference is “expected” to be held the previous week? You seriously expect the SNP to know that when you yourselves do not? Perhaps you could blame the SNP for the earth being round instead of flat, as you would obviously prefer it to be.

  • Move Conference to Glasgow?

  • I’m sure any date would have clashed with on e event or another, and let’s face it, a convention of upholsters would have higher attendance than there are lib dems in scotland.

    If you care about Scotland then you’ll either have to reschedule or miss it. Somethings are more important than small meetings of political activists.

  • I don’t get it either. The referendum *doesn’t* clash with your conference, as has been pointed out above, so what exactly is the problem? Or is it that you won’t be able to spend the five preceding days stuffing yellow-themed leaflets through people’s letterboxes? The long-suffering citizens of Scotland might actually breathe a wee sigh of relief at that…

  • David Rogers 22nd Mar '13 - 7:54am

    Don’t you have postal votes in Scotland?

  • Caron, do you realise how ludicrous and other-worldy your complaint sounds to those who are not LibDem voters (and judging by some of the other comments, some who are)? A head shaking moment.

  • Ammh, a referendum should be more important than a party conference.

    Is the number of delegates to the party conference going to be so large that the future of Scotland will hinge around their votes? Surely, not…

  • Robin Bennett 22nd Mar '13 - 3:59pm

    The following is from Brian Taylor on the BBC web site on why (among other reasons) the date was chosen

    “18 September means avoiding the UK party conference season in late September/early October.

    These would have been dominated by anti-independence messages. “

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarStephen Howse 19th Apr - 8:12pm
    Indeed. So do we really need another one in a position of power and influence?
  • User AvatarCaracatus 19th Apr - 7:57pm
    Bath is one of the 12 or so seats the Lib Dems will almost certainly win, so I hope they pick someone who has the...
  • User AvatarDavid-1 19th Apr - 7:30pm
    I'm sure the loss of the members has to be counted Nick's biggest win, as by it he's moved the Liberal Democrats significantly to the...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 19th Apr - 7:18pm
    David Evershed - Which bit of losing 22,000 members; 2,150 councillors; 5 MPs, most of our MSPs and in a month's time most if not...
  • User AvatarGeoffrey Payne 19th Apr - 7:04pm
    I guessed Dennis Potter and I was right! Luck I guess although I knew he was left wing. It is worth finding the video clips...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 19th Apr - 7:01pm
    Ah well, there goes another seat in 2015. Sadly even in a strong seat like this, incumbency was by far our best chance.