Mark Pack

Sheffield Labour drops Lib Dem policy of extra pay for the lowest paid

By | Mon 27th June 2011 - 10:01 pm

The Sheffield Star reports:

SHEFFIELD’S ruling Labour councillors have been attacked by Nick Clegg for ‘dropping’ a policy to give the authority’s lowest-paid staff an extra £250 each year.

The payment was made for staff paid below £21,000-a-year, under the old Lib Dem administration’s budget for 2011/12 – and Mr Clegg said it was supposed to happen on an annual basis.

But papers setting out the council’s financial plans for 2011/12 – including cuts of at least £48 million – do not include a pay rise next year.

Mr Clegg said: “I’ve had meetings with some of the country’s leading trade union representatives, who recognised that Sheffield was the only big council in the UK to provide the £250 payment – and that it was what they wanted.

“I think they will be horrified to hear that the new Labour council is dropping the commitment to help some of the lowest paid, when they are taking money from reserves to pay for extra spending elsewhere.

 

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/24568 for Twitter and emails.

6 Comments

  • Dave 28th Jun '11 - 8:28am

    It’s funny that only half of the article has been added to Lib Dem Voice. Maybe that’s because its the only part of the article that they like?

    For balance, please read what ithe article goes on to say…

    “This approach was discussed with the old Lib Dem leader, Coun Paul Scriven, and agreed to be taken forward. A collective agreement on this was achieved with the Trade Unions, which was explicit that the payment would apply for the 2011/12 period only.”

    So hardly Labour cutting a payment. The Council and Trade Union’s agreed whilst the Lib Dems ran the Council that it would be for 1 year only.

    This story is no more than spin in the pure desperation of a return to power.

  • KL 28th Jun '11 - 8:44am

    @Dave, what you don’t say is that quote was from the Labour leader of the council and not part of the journalist’s own interpretation. The article also doesn’t actually quote Paul Scriven, not has it given him a ‘right of reply’ to the claims made by Labour. The unions may have accepted that the payment was only for the 2011/12 period, but the intentions of the Lib Dem Council appear to have been to continue the payment in future budgets.

    If you’re going to accuse someone of “spin”, at least make sure you’re not spinning in return…

  • Kirsten de Keyser 28th Jun '11 - 10:40am

    Well, they have to have some spare cash for their olympic ticket allocation

  • IT 29th Jun '11 - 11:03am

    Just to confirm, it was agreed as an annual increase and is in black and white within the budget book. Labour councillors in Sheffield have no evidence what so ever that this was agreed by the previous Council Leader, mainly because the claim is totally untrue!

  • Leekliberal 30th Jun '11 - 7:22pm

    Labour increased the gap between rich and poor over their 13 years and created a vast beaurocracy to adminster it. They are at it again. How about that Labour trolls!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Allen 22nd May - 5:25pm
    More wishful thinking. Yes, the Tories can fight like cats, provided an election is a safe distance away. Something somehow always brings them back together...
  • User AvatarDave Page 22nd May - 4:38pm
    I'm wondering how we can get the message across to more people than we normally manage to reach in a typical Euro campaign. Perhaps a...
  • User AvatarAndrew Chamberlain 22nd May - 4:31pm
    Chris_sh: In response to your first question - I hadn't intended to suggest that the damage to the Conservative party's poll rating has been caused...
  • User AvatarDave Page 22nd May - 4:16pm
    The Scottish approach of licensing registrars, who can perform ceremonies wherever they can get permission, rather than licensing venues as we do in England and...
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 22nd May - 4:01pm
    Well, that was the Attorney General's rather obtuse interpretation of it, which was rebutted very effectively by Julian. The example the AG gave was "tiddlywinks...