Smithson’s view: Why I won’t bet on the Lib Dems any more

Written by Mike Smithson on 27th February 2008 – 2:15 pm

At about 6pm in the evening on election day in 2005 I got a text from a Cowley Street staffer who gave upbeat reports about a number of key seats. It was promising and all the specific seats turned out to be spot on. But I made the terrible mistake of extrapolating this into an overall national picture that was much better than actually happened.

The result was that I placed what proved to be the most costly political bet of my life. This involved ‘buying’ Lib Dem seats on the spread-betting markets for several hundred pounds a point. The ‘buy’ level was at 67 seats my hope was that I would get my stake back multiplied by the number of MPs the party go in excess of 67.

Alas it was not to be. The party came in at 62 seats so my loss was the difference between that number and 67 multiplied by my stake. Ouch.

Fortunately my other bets on the election came good and I ended the night a net winner.

But the lesson here was that you should be very careful about betting on things that you desperately want to happen. Your judgement gets distorted and you look only for evidence that supports your view and ignore that which suggests otherwise.

This is one reason why betting on politics can be quite profitable – provided you have a proper sense of detachment. There are many punters about, particularly in the closing days and hours of an election campaign, who are betting for their allegiance and cannot interpret things objectively. In other words they are mugs like I was. One factor about betting is that the more mugs there are taking part in a market the better the chance of profit.

Since May 5th 2005 I have imposed a fairly strict rule on myself never to bet on the Lib Dems. This proved costly at the time of the Dunfermline by election when all the indications were, as the votes were being counted, that a sensational victory was on the cards.

So today my betting is focused almost entirely on three area – how many seats the Tories will get at the general election, the fight for the Democratic nomination in the US and the London Mayoralty. In the first I feel completely detached because I don’t really care either way. I buy and sell seat on the spread markets and most of the time make money. I should explain that with this form of betting you can close down your position whenever you want and I’ve already pocketed several thousand pounds.

One factor that helps is that generally there are more optimistic Tory gamblers about than those of other parties. Normally that can create good value in the pricing.

The Ken-Boris battle is completely absorbing and people are starting to bet with a huge passion on either side. My money was on Boris when his price was near 2/1. That’s now tightened and it has become a very hard call.

My Democratic race betting is not looking as good as it was. I thought that Hillary would do better than she is doing. I do have a bet taken out in May 2005 at 50/1 that it will be President Obama. That looks pretty good and will have given me enormous satisfaction even if he does not do it.

* Mike Smithson founded and edits PoliticalBetting.com, the UK’s leading political discussion blog. He was a founder member of the Liberal Democrats, stood for Parliament at the 1992 General Election, and has served as both a county and borough councillor. This is the second in a regular series of monthly articles from Mike.


Posted in Op-eds

6 Comments to “Smithson’s view: Why I won’t bet on the Lib Dems any more”

  • Ian Ridley Says:

    Just to say that I made a penny or two on Dunfermline. But only by looking at the betting exchanges just prior to the declaration. There seemed to be a rush of people prepared to bet on a Labour win a 100/1 against! I can only guess that they were misinformed!

  • Dominic Says:

    Unusually we were given the chance to vote on the 2006 local elections in London (many thanks Mike for pointing this out) and some of the odds were ridiculously generous. I think I got something like 10/1 against Labour losing control of Camden, for example. Similar for the Tories winning Hammersmith & Fulham. Really easy money which I think must be a combination of punters voting with their hearts and an immature betting market, where the bookmakers don’t really know what they’re doing.

    Nice pocket money though :)

  • Geoffrey Payne Says:

    The only winners when it comes to gambling are the bookies. Inviduals go bankupt, but you rarely hear of a bookie going under.
    The occasional person bucks the trend, but they too are good news for the bookie, because that person provides the illusion that you can make money by gambling.
    I remember walking past a bookies when I was a boy with my grandfather. “They are not there for your benefit” he said. Never a trurer word was said in my opinion.

  • Tim Leunig Says:

    Mike: I was told the same thing, and the next day I was glad that I am not (usually) a betting man. As you say, betting against people who are enthusiastic is a sound policy. Best wishes, and keep up the good work here and at political betting - my daily must-read. Tim

  • Dan Says:

    It’s just a shame that pb.c is now so infested by moronic spotty Tory trolls that it has nothing useful to say on domestic politics.

    Having said that - if you want to make money on foreign elections - then there is no better place to be on election night.

  • Steven Ronald Says:

    “It’s just a shame that pb.c is now so infested by moronic spotty Tory trolls that it has nothing useful to say on domestic politics.”

    It’s a fair point but I think PBC is strong enough to pass through this phase.

    I think it’s ironic that M Smithson’s epithany came when he has getting actually correct inside(ish) information - surely one of he best ways of making money from political bets.



Leave a Comment



Subscribe without commenting

RSS

Liberal Democrat Voice is an independent, collaborative website run by Liberal Democrat activists, where any individual inside or outside the party can express their views. Views expressed on this website are those of the individuals who express them and may not reflect those of the party.