Social care reforms – open thread

Jeremy Hunt is due to confirm the pre-announced details of Social Care reform later today.

The BBC summarises what’s known about the proposals here:

The government is due to announce its “fully-funded solution” to the problem of elderly people in England who cannot afford social care.

It is expected to include a £75,000 cap on the costs people pay for care and a rise in the threshold for means-tested support from £23,250 to £123,000.

Health secretary Jeremy Hunt said the “scandal” of many people selling homes to pay care bills must be tackled.

Do these proposals go far enough?

Does anyone understand them?

Will significant numbers of people still have to sell their homes?

Over to you!

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • From what I have seen these are a half measure to benefit the better off in society (including me if I get to the end of my life without a substantial change in circumstances).

    I think a simple, and dare I say progressive, system would be to give a protected amount after which a percentage can be taken to fund care as required. Where assets are fixed, for example in a property the amount can be recouped, prior to inheritance tax being calculated, from the estate after death.

    This way everyone gets to pass on a percentage of their accumulated wealth after their death. The current proposals will not be a burden on the wealthy, but will take a disproportionate amount from the less well off.

  • I support the Osborne -dubbed “death tax”. I believe that there is a myth surrounding the “worked hard all my life to have something to leave to childdren (cats,dogs etc.?)
    I am over 70. I belong to a generation who had it better than any before or since; low deposit mortgages affordable house purchase before the crazy escalation. That crazy inflation of house prices bestowed an undeserved capital asset- rent free don’t forget. I had free higher education , a job all my life and a final salary pension. We have supported our kids who are settled. So I have been really lucky and won’t care about £20K(?) out of my estate when I have popped my clogs!!

  • Brian D – it’s good to hear someone of your generation acknowledge their good fortune. I’ve just handed over (or rather the mortgage company has) a big sum of money to someone recently retired for a large enough house for my family. He was able to buy a house in France and afford two sets of school fees on a single salary. Now, just buying the house can be barely afforded on two salaries.

  • Well said, Brian D. I am a little younger but never regarded my house purchases as ‘ investments’ but as somewhere to live. We are obsessed with passing on unearned capital to our children instead of using it to pay our own care costs. I have had all the advantages Brian describes and supported my two children through higher education as well. When/if the time comes, I’ll pay my own way.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarTynan 24th May - 4:06am
    Thekes-: Would you stop the F.A. cup final or the rugby cup final as being trivial noise, or draining resources ,risking safety etc ,whilst families...
  • User AvatarTynan 24th May - 3:48am
    Andrew McCaig-: I would suggest your statement says more about you than May or the conservative party.
  • User AvatarGlenn 24th May - 1:34am
    I think getting side tracked by arguments about the IRA misses the point. The IRA had a distinct organised chain of command, weapons stores and...
  • User Avatarmalc 24th May - 12:23am
    @Graham Evans ‘While the IRA did not explicitly set out to kill civilians,’ You obviously don't recall Gerry Adams saying the families of British servicemen/women...
  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 23rd May - 10:30pm
    @Graham Evans 'While the IRA did not explicitly set out to kill civilians,' That's a really fallacious argument. In the Northern Ireland troubles, all terrorist...
  • User AvatarNonconformistradical 23rd May - 9:47pm
    @Glenn " I must admit I just assumed that there was a mechanism that took into account the possibility of a national crisis." In 2001...