<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some serious media coverage of Nick’s speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/some-serious-media-coverage-of-nicks-speech-4082.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/some-serious-media-coverage-of-nicks-speech-4082.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:35:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Clegg's Candid Friend</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/some-serious-media-coverage-of-nicks-speech-4082.html#comment-63213</link>
		<dc:creator>Clegg's Candid Friend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=4082#comment-63213</guid>
		<description>Not really serious comment, but quite interesting and entertaining:
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/john-rentoul/john-rentoul-get-with-it-nick-walkandtalk-is-so-last-year-936858.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really serious comment, but quite interesting and entertaining:<br />
<a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/john-rentoul/john-rentoul-get-with-it-nick-walkandtalk-is-so-last-year-936858.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/john-rentoul/john-rentoul-get-with-it-nick-walkandtalk-is-so-last-year-936858.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Tall</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/some-serious-media-coverage-of-nicks-speech-4082.html#comment-62876</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=4082#comment-62876</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, scampi, I should have included &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/leading_article/article4776202.ece&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Times&#039; leader&lt;/a&gt; as well:



&lt;blockquote&gt;... this has been a good week for the Liberal Democrats at the end of a good year. ... The recent shifts in policy have been remarkable, though mostly unremarked. It is not so long ago that Liberal Democrat education policy was more or less faxed over by the teachers. Now the Lib Dems are in the vanguard of arguments about parental power and a premium for poorer children. ... The Liberal Democrats have an important place as the anti-conventional wisdom party, testing ideas, goading the others.

Above all, they should be articulating a brand of radical liberalism - or optimistic liberalism, as Mr Clegg called it - from which the two main parties have a great deal to learn. The tax proposals unveiled this week will be mocked for their mixture of spurious specificity and poor arithmetic. It is, indeed, a mistake to attach numbers to the proposal, not least because it obscures the main point. And that is that people on low and middle incomes pay too much of their income in taxation. The progressive case for tax cuts is more daring than the Conservatives&#039;, more in touch than Labour&#039;s and a good liberal principle in itself.

In an interview on the fringe this week, Mr Clegg emphatically described himself as a liberal. His conference speech contained the seeds of a viable liberal position that will champion independence as its sovereign value, that will push power to the lowest possible level and that will encourage everyone to live a life of their own choosing.

If the leader can take his party with him, the Lib Dems could yet turn themselves into a party with a purpose. The Liberal Democrats will still be a coalition, as all political parties are, but the emphasis will be on the first word.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, scampi, I should have included <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/leading_article/article4776202.ece" rel="nofollow">The Times&#8217; leader</a> as well:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230; this has been a good week for the Liberal Democrats at the end of a good year. &#8230; The recent shifts in policy have been remarkable, though mostly unremarked. It is not so long ago that Liberal Democrat education policy was more or less faxed over by the teachers. Now the Lib Dems are in the vanguard of arguments about parental power and a premium for poorer children. &#8230; The Liberal Democrats have an important place as the anti-conventional wisdom party, testing ideas, goading the others.</p>
<p>Above all, they should be articulating a brand of radical liberalism &#8211; or optimistic liberalism, as Mr Clegg called it &#8211; from which the two main parties have a great deal to learn. The tax proposals unveiled this week will be mocked for their mixture of spurious specificity and poor arithmetic. It is, indeed, a mistake to attach numbers to the proposal, not least because it obscures the main point. And that is that people on low and middle incomes pay too much of their income in taxation. The progressive case for tax cuts is more daring than the Conservatives&#8217;, more in touch than Labour&#8217;s and a good liberal principle in itself.</p>
<p>In an interview on the fringe this week, Mr Clegg emphatically described himself as a liberal. His conference speech contained the seeds of a viable liberal position that will champion independence as its sovereign value, that will push power to the lowest possible level and that will encourage everyone to live a life of their own choosing.</p>
<p>If the leader can take his party with him, the Lib Dems could yet turn themselves into a party with a purpose. The Liberal Democrats will still be a coalition, as all political parties are, but the emphasis will be on the first word.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Ridley</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/some-serious-media-coverage-of-nicks-speech-4082.html#comment-62730</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Ridley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=4082#comment-62730</guid>
		<description>Especially as the Indie is now £1 a throw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Especially as the Indie is now £1 a throw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scampi</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/some-serious-media-coverage-of-nicks-speech-4082.html#comment-62718</link>
		<dc:creator>scampi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=4082#comment-62718</guid>
		<description>So big news in the Independent - that&#039;ll double the poll ratings:)))))))))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So big news in the Independent &#8211; that&#8217;ll double the poll ratings:)))))))))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

