Stephen Tall on Sky News comments on today’s Chris Rennard allegations

Lib Dem Voice co-editor Stephen Tall was interviewed on Sky News earlier today about the allegations concerning Chris Rennard — here’s what he had to say:

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in YouTube.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/33404 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

9 Comments

  • A very competent and measured performance, but I’m still left wondering about some of the people at the top of your Party. You mentioned the importance of an independent head to investigate the allegations and in an earlier post your Chief Exec stated that Alistair Webster QC would lead the investigation into the specific allegations.

    Now I’m pretty certain that you’d don’t get to have a CV like Alistair Webster QC unless you’re pretty darn good at what you do, I’m also certain he’d make a good job of leading such an investigation. The problem though is that this is politics, are your adversaries going to have a field day with his appointment? I admit when I read that post I had an “Is It Me” moment, is it really wise to appoint some one who is “a former Chairman of the Liberal Democrat Lawyers Association”, said organisation proudly stating that it’s aim is to “…… be a pre-eminent campaigning organisation serving the Liberal Democrat Party and helping with policy formation.”

    Isn’t this going to be compared unfavourably with (for instance) the BBC who appointed some one from their largest competitor (Sky) to carry out their investigation?

  • David Wilkinson 26th Feb '13 - 6:10am

    It appears that you are one of those of the fringe of the Westminster village who just cannot resist your moment of fame, it would be better for all concerned, the women involved, Rennard and the rest of us in the party to keep your mouth shut until the inquiries have been held.
    Whatever comes out the party is in for a major reform of procedures and the wings of some high flying know alls in the Westminster sewer being clipped.
    It is a wake up call for the national party both in and out of parliament to get real, be more aware to issues and problems and deal with them and not hope they will go away.

  • @David Wilkinson,

    So what should happen then, Should Sky simply say “nobody from the Lib Dems was available for comment”?

    I thought he did really well and should move off the fringe of the Westminister village closer to its centre.

  • Keith Browning 26th Feb '13 - 10:55am

    One of the most ‘common sense’ interviews’ by anyone in the political bubble I have heard for a long time. No jargon, no mealy mouthing or avoiding the question – Stephen, you’ll never make a politician..!!

  • Yes fair play to you, Stephen, you’re contribution has been like a breath of fresh air. Much respect.

  • I thought Stephen did well, and I suppose that LDV is the nearest that we have to conservativehome, etc.
    I also agree that it is time for the members to take our party back.

  • Richard Dean 28th Feb '13 - 3:56pm

    Parts of the LibDem response seems faintly ridiculous, in the sense that one of the widely-recognized slang meanings of the verb “to screw” is “to have sexual intercourse with”. Saying “we screwed up” will therefore look like some kind of joke to some people – as if taking the mick.

    How many people? Well it seems the BBC and ITV are happy to have the original and variants of Ed Ball’s “Friar Tuck” spoken vicariously many times after the watershed, so these organizations presumably believe there is a large enough audience who regularly accept and understand these slang terms. So it looks like a lot of people will find us risible.

    I therefore suggest it might be better to change the image, and say that we “made a mistake”, or “failed”, or “got it badly wrong”, but not “screwed up”! Also, maybe some LibDems need to get out and meet the ordinary, slang-ready people a bit more often?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarSIMON BANKS 31st Oct - 9:16am
    Caractacus: I assume you went to Clacton and saw that the effort was zilch? I would agree that the level of outside help was disappointing,...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 31st Oct - 9:16am
    Well done Toby Matthews for one of the best pieces in LDV for some time. Thought-provoking and attracting some interesting comments in the threads that...
  • User AvatarISHvinder Matharu 31st Oct - 9:15am
    I would prefer our Knight, a man I have a great deal of respect for, to perhaps say "anti Bibi's Government" not anti Israel. It...
  • User AvatarJohn Roffey 31st Oct - 8:59am
    The problem is with any 'initiative' taken by the Party at present - it has to be viewed as a device to advantage the electoral...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 31st Oct - 8:34am
    An interesting piece by Andrew which was no doubt written before yesterday's events in Israel, which will not have helped the situation in Paris or...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 31st Oct - 8:01am
    An object lesson in how a minister should respond to serious questions from an opposition member. . "..The member has raised a serious issue, and...