Stormin’ Norman on the warpath again

That tireless Parliamentary terrier, Lib Dem MP Norman Baker, has been doing what he does best, once again: demanding answers to awkward questions. The man who forced Peter Mandelson to quit the cabinet last time around has now turned his attention to two new bete-noires:

1) Gordon Brown’s refusal to answer questions, which The Guardian’s Politics Blog notes – here’s what Norman said to the House of Commons, courtesy of Hansard:

The issue of openness is crucial for democracy. We touched on it in the previous debate about MPs’ expenses. After all my years in politics, both nationally and in local councils, my strong view is that being open and accountable for our actions is not only a requirement for all of us; it also leads to better government. It is in the interests of the ruling party or parties for there to be openness. Sometimes, it does not seem that way, but in the medium to long term, that is undoubtedly the case.

I am sorry to say that, over the past 11 years, there has been some slippage in that openness, accountability and willingness to answer questions frankly. I suspect that that is not unusual in a Government. The longer they are in power, the more they feel responsible for themselves and the more they feel an obligation to hide things. It is perhaps a human reaction, but it is also a wrong reaction, because once they hide something, they then have to hide the fact that they have hidden it, and there begins a vicious circle that can end up with a Government becoming defensive and not releasing information that should properly in the public domain, even though they had started out in a different vein. … However, it does not seem to me that the principle in [the Freedom of Information Act] has been followed through in the practices of all Ministers when they answer parliamentary questions. …

The worst practice in Government, I am afraid, relates to the Prime Minister, and to the answers that he signs off to parliamentary written questions addressed to him.

(In parentheses, can I add there’s then a rather nice exchange between Norman and Chris Bryant (deputy Leader of the House):

I should like to think that the Prime Minister was not personally responsible. I should like to think that it was a matter for the spotty apparatchiks who occupy the back of No. 10 and draft the answers for him.

Chris Bryant: They are not spotty.

Norman Baker: The Minister says they are not spotty; presumably that means that they are indeed apparatchiks.)

And Norman concludes:

I have asked the Prime Minister 23 written parliamentary questions in the last 12 months. … but I think it fair to say that only 17 per cent, of them—four out of 23—have been answered in any way satisfactorily, while 83 per cent, have not been answered properly at all. That is not good enough. How are these questions not answered properly? What techniques are used? Sometimes the Prime Minister will provide irrelevant information: he is asked one thing, but his reply bears no relation to the question he was asked. Sometimes he provides information that is so vague that it cannot be used in any shape or form. Sometimes he answers the bit of the question he likes, and leaves unanswered the bits that are more difficult to answer. These techniques may be well established—perhaps they are not unique to this Prime Minister and have been employed by other Prime Ministers, and also by other Ministers. I do not wish, therefore, to pretend that the this Prime Minister is a lot worse than any other, but these are not techniques to be proud of, and nor do they bear close scrutiny. I hope that he and the Deputy Leader of the House will recognise that it would be better if proper answers were given to parliamentary questions.

2) The Royal Family’s 100-year-old convention that their wills may be kept secret – as reported in today’s Times the convention is to be reexamined by senior judges:

Sir Mark Potter, the leading family judge in Britain, is to set up a committee that will review the policy allowing royal wills to remain “sealed” as part of a wider look at the rules on probate. The move was announced yesterday by Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, in a parliamentary answer to Norman Baker, the Liberal Democrat MP for Lewes.

Mr Baker said: “There should be one rule that is the same for everyone. If other people’s wills have to be published so should those of the Royal Family who are in receipt of large amounts of public money.”

If Norman Baker didn’t exist, we should surely need to invent him.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMark Goodrich 25th Oct - 3:23am
    We can all trade anecdotes and I am sure that the vast majority of people are getting on with each other as well as ever....
  • User AvatarMark Goodrich 25th Oct - 3:04am
    Hear hear to Gareth Hartwell above. The thread was extremely light on comments which recognise that this news is both bad for the EU and...
  • User AvatarJonathan Ferguson 25th Oct - 2:54am
    1. I'm all for commenting on innovative ideas like the Land Tax (it may not be new, but it's innovative in the sense that it...
  • User AvatarManfarang 24th Oct - 11:48pm
    Roland "there is a problem with immigration" I can't remember a time in the last 50 years when people in Britain didn't say there was...
  • User Avatarmalc 24th Oct - 11:43pm
    My local towns are as multicultural as most and I just don't see what Tim Farron sees. The local papers rarely - if ever -...
  • User Avatarfrankie 24th Oct - 11:19pm
    jedibeeftrix Hard brexit may well result in higher growth in the long term, as regulatory and tax divergence from the EU ensues. but how long...