Swinson: Tories’ anti-gay actions speak louder than words

Lib Dem MP Jo Swinson has rebutted Alan Duncan’s accusations that she unfairly highlighted Tory MPs’ overwhelming failure to support gay rights.

Mr Duncan branded the Lib Dems “shits” after Ms Swinson, the party’s equalities spokesperson, pointed out the following facts:

* 80% of the 25-member Tory shadow front-bench has voted against major items of gay rights legislation since 1998;
* 90% of those eligible to vote voted against the equalisation of the age of consent; and
* 85% of those eligible to vote voted against the repeal of Section 28.

Mr Duncan, the Tories’ first openly gay MP, railed against Ms Swinson on the New Statesman website: “Historically, the Conservatives have been behind the curve. … But a piece of research like this isn’t constructive. It just makes the Liberal Democrats look like shits.”

The New Statesman observes:

Despite his recent support for the Sexual Orientation Discrimination legislation and civil partnerships, Tory leader Cameron has a chequered record on gay rights, having voted against gay adoption under a three-line whip. But a Tory spokesman said Cameron had abstained from a whipped vote under former leader Iain Duncan Smith on the repeal of Section 28 and supported gay adoption.

In fact, Cameron voted against the repeal of Section 28 passing to a second reading before abstaining on the second reading.

In 2000 as candidate for Witney he told a local paper that the Blair government “continues to be obsessed with their ‘fringe’ agenda, including deeply unpopular moves like repealing Section 28 and allowing the promotion of homosexuality in schools,” and that “Blair has moved heaven and earth to allow the promotion of homosexuality in schools”.

As Ms Swinson points out in the comments of the Statesman’s online article:

Actions speak louder than words! … In March this year, Tory MPs voted 3 to 1 against measures to protect lesbian, gay and bisexual people from discrimination in goods and services. Furthermore in June a Populus survey showed 54 percent of Tory MPs opposed equal rights for homosexual couples.

Whatever accusations Mr. Duncan may chose to throw at me for saying this, the voting record of the Conservative party, including the voting record of the party this year, would send a chill down the spine of most, if not all, lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender members of society. It is not unreasonable to point this out.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • I wonder, why only the opponents have modified , it gives a bit one-sided account on the events in Bermondsey in 1983.

  • Sorry, what I meant to say was, I wonder, why only the opponents have modified this Wikipedia article, it gives a bit one-sided account on the events in Bermondsey in 1983.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermondsey_by-election%2C_1983

  • “Mr Duncan, the Tories’ first openly gay MP”

    I think he was the first Tory to come out as his own choice, but not the first openly gay Con MP overall: for ex Michael Brown after being outed in mid 90’s was openly gay before Duncan

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • paul barker
    @David Evans In London we ran on Competence & Hard Work, we made gains in places where we already ran The Council, everywhere else we went backward or went...
  • Peter Hirst
    Entering a race implies usually a commitment to win it. The idea should be not to win a hyporthetical AI race but to find the best compromise between using it w...
  • Peter Hirst
    You might get more volunteers if it was clearer that they have influence over who is approved and selected for Westminster seats compared with the Westminster o...
  • Peter Hirst
    You don't mention our so called independent nuclear deterrent. There is no reason why we can't merge it with France's. Why on earth do you need two nuclear dete...
  • David Evans
    The one thing that this article shows is that it is impossible to establish a strategy that makes us clearly different from the other parties if we stick to our...