Tag Archives: alan sillitoe

Daily View 2×2: 4 March 2010

Good morning and welcome to Thursday’s Daily View.

There’s a huge chunk of exciting things that happened today in history, so it’s an auspicious day to welcome a baby Cullen. Our technical editor Ryan has been tweeting progress, and as I write this there’s a lot of pushing going on. Best wishes from all at LDV to the Cullen family – I’m sure LDV Towers will soon get used to night feeds. I’m dusting off my copy of Gina Ford as I type.

Male swans from Matthew Bourne's Swan LakeSo, today in history: the US Congress met for the first time in 1789. In 1790, France was divvied into départements. In 1797, John Adams succeeded George Washington, the first ever peaceful transfer of power between elected leaders in modern times. Chicago was founded in 1837; Tchaikovsky’s Swan Lake premiered in Moscow in 1877 and in 1882, East London saw Britain’s first electric trams. The first Daimler car was unveiled and in 1933, the first woman joined the US Cabinet.

March 4th birthdays include Vivaldi, in 1678, Sir Patrick Moore, and Nottingham novellist Alan Sillitoe (I was at the meeting of Nottingham City Council that made him an honorary freeman of the city, incidentally)

2 Big Stories

Evil Gays update

Civil partnerships – gay marriages – could soon be registered in places of worship – something currently expressly banned by statute, which is particularly unfair on those faiths which don’t have a problem with gay relationships, including Quakers and Reform Judaism. The Times has one version of the information; the Telegraph on the other hand manages to paint a far more bleak version of the havoc that could be wrought by litigious homos.

Meanwhile, David Cameron has averred that his party’s tax breaks, maternity and paternity rights planned for married couples will also be available to their civilly partnershipped brethren. Not quite sure how this tallies with last month’s pronouncement that would be no new gay rights under the Tories.

Posted in Daily View | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and | 2 Comments



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Dean 20th Aug - 5:03am
    Fortunately, there are some 0's missing from several of the calculations. The original figure for the whole earth is 122,400,000 GW. Dividing that by 4...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 20th Aug - 1:26am
    ... which means that so-called "renewable" energy methods - wind and wave power for example - are not actually sustainable in the long-term. Not if...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 20th Aug - 1:05am
    @Mark Inskip Clever, had me defeated for a while, but I am Phoenix ... The UK is 1% of the world's population, and appears to...
  • User AvatarMark Inskip 20th Aug - 12:24am
    @Richard Dean what Peter wrote "After allowing for the portion of the earth illuminated at any moment, and the amount of energy reflected back to...
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 20th Aug - 12:13am
    Adam, Carlile made comments which were really insulting and could have been construed as intimidating, about the women. Those I think went beyond the remit...
  • User AvatarAdam Robertson 19th Aug - 11:55pm
    Caron, thank you for replying back to me. I agree with you about what Chris Davies said and he immediately apologized. I think we all...