Tag Archives: andrew slaughter

Daily View 2×2: 5 January 2010

With the thought that there are only 353 days to Christmas and considerably fewer until the General Election, we launch into today’s Daily View.

On this day in 1918, the Free Committee for a German Workers Peace, which would become the Nazi party, was founded. In 1941, the aviator Amy Johnson, disappeared over the Thames Estuary and was never found. And 28 years ago today, Peter Sutcliffe, a 35-year-old lorry driver from Bradford appeared in court, charged with 13 murders of women in West Yorkshire.

Happy birthday to the second most famous son of Abbots Langley, footballer, actor and current Celebrity Big Brother ‘inmate’ Vinnie Jones, who is 45 today and to former US Vice President Walter F. Mondale, who is 82.

2 Interesting Stories

With the thought that some of you may have already noticed other parties’ pronouncements in the news yesterday, here are two more slants on the coming election.

 We’re being outgunned by slick Tory machine, says Labour’s Andrew Slaughter

The Labour MP for Hammersnith believes that his chances of re-election are being hampered by a lack of funding compared to his Conservative opponent. Slaughter said;

“People should be concerned that money is being poured into seats like this and the consequences of that for democracy,”

Funny how Labour never saw this as a problem when they were the ones bringing in large donations?

Posted in Daily View | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , and | Leave a comment

Opinion: Tories’ housing plot uncovered?

The Evening Standard published a bold article last Thursday suggesting that Hammersmith & Fulham Council and the Tory leadership were in a plot reminiscent of the days of Dame Shirley Porter (‘Plot to rid council estates of Poor’, 9 July 2009)

Hammersmith & Fulham Council is currently consulting on their Local Development Framework (LDF) Core Strategy Options which repeatedly refers to a need for ‘decent neighbourhoods’. Neighbourhoods that are currently not ‘decent’ have been identified throughout the borough.

It seems to me that if these neighbourhoods contained homes which do not meet national ‘decent homes standards’ then the Council and Hammersmith & Fulham Homes should be working to bring them up to standard. Where the neighbourhoods have residents who are jobless and on benefits, then the Council has a duty to provide training and improved skills. The solution should not be to demolish and decant whole estates.

The Council has, however, shown a preference for the easy fix by proposing the rebuilding of properties primarily for sale. The only assurance they provide existing residents is that the equivalent number of ‘habitable rooms’ (not number of units) for social renting will be preserved, and this over the next 20 years!

There are two conclusions that we can draw from this. First, many local residents will be without a home in Hammersmith & Fulham in years to come and will be likely to have to seek housing outside of the borough. Second, the Tory Council seems to be focussed on changing the demographics of their voters in this marginal constituency.

The present Labour MP Andrew Slaughter has felt suitably threatened and has raised the alarm claiming to have uncovered a trail of evidence showing possible complicity amongst the leadership of Hammersmith & Fulham Council – the Tory leadership as well as the right wing think tank, Localis – on this subject.

So what can we do about this?

Posted in Local government, London and Op-eds | Also tagged , and | 3 Comments



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 30th Oct - 11:49am
    Jack I do expect them to be able to hold their heads up high and stand up next to everything they voted for and supported...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 30th Oct - 11:42am
    Helen Tedcastle You are right that there are many individuals who identify as atheist not personally hostile to faith and in fact embrace some form...
  • User AvatarSIMON BANKS 30th Oct - 11:41am
    Despite some good news on environmental action from our ministers, overall we don't come across any more as seeing the environment as a major issue....
  • User AvatarHelen Tedcastle 30th Oct - 11:36am
    Richard Church What is your response to Professor Woodhead's research? Britain's religious landscape is changing but it isn't less religious. Kellner's assertion about intended Green...
  • User AvatarBob Jones 30th Oct - 11:27am
    A poll in today's Sun put the Greens on 7% and Lib Dems on 6%. This means we have lost 8% to UKIP, 5% to...
  • User AvatarRichard Church 30th Oct - 10:53am
    Helen, Opposing state funded faith schools is not intolerance of religious diversity. Diversity surely requires that all faiths and beliefs should have equal status and...