Tag Archives: benefits uprating bill

Opinion: what living on benefits really means

Rachel writes:

Every time I hear the phrase “a life on benefits”, it’s like a slap in the face to my brother, who lives in my spare room while looking for a job. He’s not lazy or a scrounger, he just can’t find a job. As Sarah Teather said two weeks ago

the term “scroungers” has become so pervasive in social consciousness that even those on benefits do not attempt to debunk the entire category, only to excuse themselves from the label.

I asked my brother if he was willing to share what his life on benefits was like:

Jonny writes:

Posted in Op-eds | 91 Comments

Benefits Uprating Bill: Andrew George and Charles Kennedy’s arguments AGAINST

The Government last night won the vote for its Benefits Uprating Bill, with the third and final reading passed by 305 votes to 246. A fortnight ago, six Lib Dem MPs voted against or abstained from the Coalition line that benefits rises should be capped at the same rate as public sector pay (a below inflation 1% pa) for each of the next three years.

Andrew George, Charles Kennedy and other Lib Dems sought to move an amendment to the Bill, linking future welfare increases to the rise in average earnings. However, time expired before it was put …

Posted in Parliament | Also tagged , and | 1 Comment

++ Government wins vote on Benefits Uprating Bill; 6 Lib Dem MPs rebel

There were no serious doubts the Coalition Government’s Benefits Uprating Bill — pegging increases in welfare payments at a below-inflation 1%, the same as public sector wage rises, for the next three years — would be approved. The only question was the size of majority and how many Lib Dems would rebel (I’ve been keeping a running tally here this afternoon).

There were two votes tonight. First, a Labour amendment to the Bill, defeated by 321 votes to 262, a government majority of 59. Then a vote on the unamended second reading, which the government won by 324 votes to …

Posted in News | Also tagged , , , , , , and | 104 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJames Baillie 26th Aug - 12:54pm
    What I really don't understand is why this apparently watertight case against CI and NIT wasn't reflected in the policy paper properly. I'm yet to...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 26th Aug - 12:54pm
    Well done "the voice " , yes , of reason and sanity , in the UK or for the US ! Trump is an outrage...
  • User AvatarStimpson 26th Aug - 12:53pm
    Clinton is the only mature choice for President. Sanders was basically Corbyn with guns. Sadly though Clinton seems to have fallen for populist rhetoric over...
  • User AvatarStimpson 26th Aug - 12:51pm
    The Lib Dems have always been a party that supports privatisation, outsourcing, liberalised markets and globalisation - it was a manifesto commitment to privatise Royal...
  • User AvatarStimpson 26th Aug - 12:50pm
    "Like having a member of staff on the train to take control if the driver is incapacitated? Is that a 19th century practice in need...
  • User AvatarGemma Roulston 26th Aug - 12:41pm
    What the Tories and Labour have done via sanctions is to make people feel like 3rd class citizens and not people with equal merit to...