Tag Archives: benefits uprating bill

Opinion: what living on benefits really means

Suel writes:

Every time I hear the phrase “a life on benefits”, it’s like a slap in the face to my brother, who lives in my spare room while looking for a job. He’s not lazy or a scrounger, he just can’t find a job. As Sarah Teather said two weeks ago

the term “scroungers” has become so pervasive in social consciousness that even those on benefits do not attempt to debunk the entire category, only to excuse themselves from the label.

I asked my brother if he was willing to share what his life on benefits was like:

Her brother writes:
I have …

Posted in Op-eds | 91 Comments

Benefits Uprating Bill: Andrew George and Charles Kennedy’s arguments AGAINST

The Government last night won the vote for its Benefits Uprating Bill, with the third and final reading passed by 305 votes to 246. A fortnight ago, six Lib Dem MPs voted against or abstained from the Coalition line that benefits rises should be capped at the same rate as public sector pay (a below inflation 1% pa) for each of the next three years.

Andrew George, Charles Kennedy and other Lib Dems sought to move an amendment to the Bill, linking future welfare increases to the rise in average earnings. However, time expired before it was put …

Posted in Parliament | Also tagged , and | 1 Comment

++ Government wins vote on Benefits Uprating Bill; 6 Lib Dem MPs rebel

There were no serious doubts the Coalition Government’s Benefits Uprating Bill — pegging increases in welfare payments at a below-inflation 1%, the same as public sector wage rises, for the next three years — would be approved. The only question was the size of majority and how many Lib Dems would rebel (I’ve been keeping a running tally here this afternoon).

There were two votes tonight. First, a Labour amendment to the Bill, defeated by 321 votes to 262, a government majority of 59. Then a vote on the unamended second reading, which the government won by 324 votes to …

Posted in News | Also tagged , , , , , , and | 104 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarfrankie 28th May - 11:03pm
    What a good idea; I heartily agree with it.
  • User Avatarnick cotter 28th May - 10:26pm
    It's the economy stupid ! The IFS yesterday stated that nether Tory or Labour figures add up....A care crisis is looming. On Brexit May says...
  • User AvatarDavid Gregson 28th May - 10:09pm
    The Tory proposal to take into account assets down to £100,000 is largely denounced as a dementia tax. . The consequences however would surely also...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 28th May - 9:51pm
    If it is correct that Peter Mandelson's objective in the 2010 general election was to minimise the losses of Gordon Brown's Labour Party then Mandelson...
  • User AvatarGlenn 28th May - 9:19pm
    Matthew, What Blair believed is irrelevant. It was sold as an anti terrorist exercise based on the threat of WMDs. It was a lot of...
  • User Avatarmalc 28th May - 8:14pm
    Some very good questions that need answering before the general election. However, at least the Tories appear to be trying to come up with a...