Tag Archives: building schools for the future

5 points on Clegg’s admission that Coalition was wrong to cut capital spending

Nick Clegg in DublinNick Clegg has sparked a flurry of excitement with his admission in an interview for The House magazine that the Coalition cut capital spending ‘too far, too fast’ to coin a phrase. Here’s what he said to Paul Waugh and Sam Macrory:

“If I’m going to be sort of self-critical, there was this reduction in capital spending when we came into the Coalition Government. I think we comforted ourselves at the time that it was actually no more than what Alistair Darling spelt out

Posted in News | Also tagged , , , , , , , and | 45 Comments

Opinion: BSF is dead – thank goodness‏

With the Conference season now upon us and with Labour preparing to crown their new Leader it seems appropriate that we lay to rest the myth that BSF (Building Schools for the Future) was some great effective scheme. In fact it was a bureaucratic joke with too few beneficiaries and huge expensive processes. The Liberal Democrat Conference is a good chance to cheer and toast the end of BSF and focus on education and pupils and real improvements.

It was 2005 and the local elections in London were scheduled for 2006. It was clear, we were clear, parents were clear, that there was a need for additional secondary school places in north west London in the Borough of Camden. The case for more places in the south of the Borough was also compelling – the campaign for a school ‘south of the Euston Road’ was pretty noisy and indeed compelling. And yet Camden Council had got itself to a place whereby it looked inactive, unable to articulate a more pro-active vision and lacking the political leadership to secure a new school.

I remember very clearly the conversation in Cllr Keith Moffitt’s front room in West Hampstead about the need for a new school.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 6 Comments



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMark Argent 19th Sep - 8:44pm
    I am with those who are thinking it makes sense to re-visit elected regional assemblies — but with more powers than were on offer last...
  • User AvatarPhil Beesley 19th Sep - 8:36pm
    Paul Barker: "The next Crisis is in 3 weeks, possibly. UKIPs victory in Clacton may be followed by other defections of Tory (& possibly Labour...
  • User AvatarLittle Jackie Paper 19th Sep - 8:33pm
    Stuart - I'm inclined to agree. A lot of people on political websites seem to have formed a view that the public at large is...
  • User AvatarLittle Jackie Paper 19th Sep - 8:22pm
    Ms Jack - It is great to see someone give this matter some thought. Really all political parties (stress, all) have basically treated the young...
  • User AvatarJohn Roffey 19th Sep - 8:19pm
    @ Matthew Huntbach Although it is a consistent view expressed by Party members that voters 'fear[ we have] under the current FPTP system of “splitting...
  • User AvatarJohn Minard 19th Sep - 8:08pm
    Be careful! If the changes considered for Westminster mean that there can never realistically be a Scottish Prime Minister or Chancellor (a "King" of Scots...