Tag Archives: glenrothes by-election

Glenrothes by-election marked register set to rise from the dead

A week today, starting at 10am on Monday 16th November, an act of political record keeping resurrection will commence as the lost marked register from the Glenrothes Westminster Parliamentary by-election is recreated.

The lost of the Glenrothes marked register caused more controversy than such loses usually do both because it happened at a Parliamentary by-election and because the result in that election was, to many people, a surprise.

The Goverment’s reaction to the loss of marked registers after the 2005 general election was underwhelming. As I described it in February:

In other words : ‘we don’t know on what dates records were

Posted in Election law and News | Also tagged and | Leave a comment

Missing: one marked register

News via the Press Association:

The SNP demanded an inquiry after it emerged that a record of everyone who voted in last year’s Glenrothes by-election has gone missing.

The party had asked to see the marked registers from November’s crucial by-election – which resulted in a shock victory for Labour.

I’m not hugely surprised by this, as after the 2005 general election there were numerous complaints from people who tried to access the marked register for their constituency about the records being in a poor shape, delayed for long periods on in part missing. The rules then were that marked registers were …

Posted in Election law and News | Also tagged , , and | 6 Comments

What does Glenrothes mean for the Lib Dems?

In the scheme of things, it seems unlikely that this week will be best remembered by history for a by-election in Scotland; but, still, the Glenrothes was (as politicians under the kosh of bad polls are prone to note) about real votes in a real election.

And the Lib Dems tanked. The party’s vote dropped by 10%, our meagre 947 votes failing to save our deposit, with the added ignominy of finishing behind the Tories. None of which can be any reflection on our candidate, Harry Wills. But it must cause the rest of us to reflect. In a

Posted in Op-eds and Parliamentary by-elections | 29 Comments

Glenrothes: thank you

A copy of the thank you message from by-election agent Andrew Reeves has winged its way to LDV Towers:

What a great effort everyone has put into the campaign over the last 75 days. Yes, we moved into the HQ in Markinch back in August! I just wanted to say a huge and sincere thank you.

We have had great help from all over the UK, including visits from activists and Parliamentarians and many of you have helped in other ways as well.

We could not have run this campaign without you.  Thank you.

As with the previous Scottish by-election, …

Posted in Parliamentary by-elections | 11 Comments

Is the SNP a shoo-in for Glenrothes? (Or is Labour lowering expectations?)

The Daily Mail’s Ben Brogan at least is convinced that Labour are down-and-out in today’s Scottish by-election:

Labour word is that Glenrothes is a lost cause. The SNP will take it by 1500, give or take 500. I don’t detect a Brown Central attempt to prepare a “shock” win. Instead they say that had they had a few days more it might have made a difference, and that without Gordon and Sarah Brown’s personal intervention the result would be far worse. So the good news is that defeat will be masked by the Obama euphoria.

Posted in Parliamentary by-elections | 9 Comments

SNP by-election candidate says he doesn’t want to be an MP for more than five years

The Daily Telegraph has the rather odd story about Glenrothes candidate Peter Grant.

Posted in Parliamentary by-elections | Leave a comment

Glenrothes update

A few members of our forum have mentioned the lack of coverage of the Glenrothes by-election, and by a curious coincidence, I received an update email from the campaign manager Andrew Reeves at almost the exact same time.

I was sat in the by-election HQ in Markinch, Glenrothes on Saturday afternoon with Tavish Scott MSP, the new Leader of the Scottish Liberal Democrats looking at the article in the Guardian, where they have said “even the Tory and the Lib Dem could lose their deposits.”

We have had this happen once this year, in the Glasgow East by-election, let us ensure it

Posted in Parliamentary by-elections | Also tagged , and | Leave a comment
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarChris Webb 25th Jun - 2:47pm
    I'd love Graham Watson to be right and given Boris' tenuous opportunistic conversion from scepticism to opposition (and non-triumphal demeanour yesterday) he just might be....
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 25th Jun - 2:45pm
    I back delaying article 50. If there was a big vote for out then we couldn't have done it, but considering the mayhem that has...
  • User AvatarSue Sutherland 25th Jun - 2:40pm
    I think it's right for Tim to express the emotion of the defeated at the moment. Indeed I wholeheartedly wish he had been given a...
  • User AvatarDavid-1 25th Jun - 2:38pm
    So now, instead, you will have a layer of EU governance that you not only never voted for, but will be unable to vote for...
  • User Avatarpaul barker 25th Jun - 2:38pm
    The vote on Thursday seems to have accidentally created what Marxists call a "Pre-Revolutionary Situation". A Situation where nothing works the way it used to,...
  • User AvatarDavid Cooper 25th Jun - 2:31pm
    Good article. The unskilled at the bottom of the job market were betrayed in 2004. When the EU expanded, their only bargaining position in the...