Tag Archives: john adams

Two for the freedom bill: seatbelts and drugs?

Professor John Adams has submitted a Mill-esque proposal for the Government’s Freedom Bill.

Adams, author of “Risk”, explains on his blog:

The Cream Buns Act would remove all existing laws and regulations that proscribe behaviour that risks only the health or safety of mentally competent adult risk takers.

Two nominations for early repeal: the seat belt law and the set of laws criminalizing the sale or use of drugs. They merit priority not only because they pass the Cream Buns Test but, more importantly, because they have criminalized millions and can be shown to have had highly significant adverse consequences. The

Posted in News | Also tagged | 30 Comments

Daily View 2×2: 4 March 2010

Good morning and welcome to Thursday’s Daily View.

There’s a huge chunk of exciting things that happened today in history, so it’s an auspicious day to welcome a baby Cullen. Our technical editor Ryan has been tweeting progress, and as I write this there’s a lot of pushing going on. Best wishes from all at LDV to the Cullen family – I’m sure LDV Towers will soon get used to night feeds. I’m dusting off my copy of Gina Ford as I type.

Male swans from Matthew Bourne's Swan LakeSo, today in history: the US Congress met for the first time in 1789. In 1790, France was divvied into départements. In 1797, John Adams succeeded George Washington, the first ever peaceful transfer of power between elected leaders in modern times. Chicago was founded in 1837; Tchaikovsky’s Swan Lake premiered in Moscow in 1877 and in 1882, East London saw Britain’s first electric trams. The first Daimler car was unveiled and in 1933, the first woman joined the US Cabinet.

March 4th birthdays include Vivaldi, in 1678, Sir Patrick Moore, and Nottingham novellist Alan Sillitoe (I was at the meeting of Nottingham City Council that made him an honorary freeman of the city, incidentally)

2 Big Stories

Evil Gays update

Civil partnerships – gay marriages – could soon be registered in places of worship – something currently expressly banned by statute, which is particularly unfair on those faiths which don’t have a problem with gay relationships, including Quakers and Reform Judaism. The Times has one version of the information; the Telegraph on the other hand manages to paint a far more bleak version of the havoc that could be wrought by litigious homos.

Meanwhile, David Cameron has averred that his party’s tax breaks, maternity and paternity rights planned for married couples will also be available to their civilly partnershipped brethren. Not quite sure how this tallies with last month’s pronouncement that would be no new gay rights under the Tories.

Posted in Daily View | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and | 2 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 1st Aug - 7:06pm
    In a soundbite or headline: How to prick a baloon, slowly?
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 1st Aug - 6:45pm
    Glenn There will be a crash and some of this will factor in, but it will be caused by unsustainable private debt and over pricing...
  • User AvatarNeil Sandison 1st Aug - 6:38pm
    There will be both disenchanted Labour , Conservative and Green voters who may feel their party have moved to a position where they feel personally...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 1st Aug - 6:33pm
    My real point is that people didn't realise what they were actually voting for, they were misled by Labour into voting to prop up the...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 1st Aug - 6:30pm
    The only reason the Tories didn't have a majority in May 2010 is because LibDem targetting gave them more seats. If the LibDems had spread...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 1st Aug - 6:30pm
    Progressives would argue that the result was simply a no to the Alternative Vote system – and people did state at the time they only...