Tag Archives: justice and security bill

Paul Strasburger writes…Reflections on the battle against Secret Courts

On Tuesday night 26 Lib Dem peers voted against a three line government Whip on Secret Courts. For many of them, it was the first time they had defied such a strong Whip. I am proud to have been one of them.

Sadly – for the party and for the country – we lost by 16 votes but would have won comfortably if Labour peers had turned up and voted in their usual numbers. They demonstrated in spades their indifference to civil liberties. The Tory Whips laid on a showing of a James Bond film during the debate to keep their …

Posted in News | 14 Comments

Liberal Democrat Lawyers’ Association speak out on secret courts

house of lordsThe Liberal Democrat Lawyers’ Association held a special meeting on Monday to discuss the Justice and Security Bill. They have sent this message to Lib Dem peers:

It was the unanimous view of the meeting that the measures introduced by the Justice and Security Bill amount to an attack on the Rule of Law in the United Kingdom and that those present were opposed to the measures contained in Part II of the Bill. I was felt that arguably the measures are a greater attack on our traditions and

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 36 Comments

Crunch time for secret courts – email the Lords tonight

This time tomorrow, the House of Lords will have voted on the Justice and Security Bill. These men and women have the future of fair and open justice in their hands.

If they pass the Bill as it stands just now, it will not satisfy the Joint Committee on Human Rights. That is serious stuff. It is counter-intuitive for any Liberal Democrat to be going against what that Committee, not to mention Liberty, Amnesty and every other human rights organisation, says. How many red flags do we need?

The amendments in the Lords will, if passed, ensure that secret courts are only …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 3 Comments

Secret Courts Bill… don’t get your hopes up

House of Lords. Photo: Parliamentary copyright images are reproduced with the permission of ParliamentSo, it has come to this. Apparently, the only hope left of stopping the Secret Courts element of the Justice and Security Bill is to persuade the Parliamentary Party in the Lords to either vote down Part II of the Bill, the bit with the Secret Courts elements in it, or to vote down the entire Bill. Easy, really. Or, perhaps, not. You see, this presumes that the Lords gets to vote on Part II or the entire …

Posted in News and Parliament | Also tagged and | 9 Comments

++ Lib Dem conference overwhelmingly votes to oppose ‘secret courts’. Again.

You may be forgiven a sense of déjà vu: the Liberal Democrats have voted overwhelmingly to oppose secret courts legislation. Just as we did last September.

Here’s the text of the motion which was just passed:

Conference believes:

1. That the measures in Part II of the Justice and Security Bill will mean the courts system of the United Kingdom will provide neither justice nor security in cases involving

Posted in Conference and News | Also tagged , and | 5 Comments

Ming Campbell MP writes… Why I support the Justice and Security Bill

Supreme Court - Some rights reserved by cphoffman42Last September in Brighton, the Conference voted to remove part 2 of the Justice and Security Bill. That Bill is now completing its final stages in Parliament. But let me assure you, that because of Liberal Democrat pressure, the Bill is now radically different. Amendments have been made such as unfettered discretion for the judge and increased safeguards in order to meet previously raised objections.

The Bill is no longer the one that was before Conference last September and I believe it is now right …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , and | 22 Comments

Secret Courts..what does the party do now?

Its’s not been the easiest 24 hours to be a Liberal Democrat. It was very hard to watch the majority of our MPs vote to remove the right to a fair trial in civil cases where national security is deemed to be a factor.  Just seven MPs voted in favour of amendments advised by the Joint Committee on Human Rights. The fact that the JCHR had a different view from the Government should surely have raised a huge red flag. An even bigger signal that our MPs were on the wrong course was the fact that Labour were voting in …

Posted in News and Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 100 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRoland 5th May - 12:50pm
    Not to detract from Catherine's success, I also note "Ed Davey is commended for his work as Minister for Energy and Climate Change in the...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 5th May - 12:22pm
    David Cameron has told Tory MPs that Turkey will not be joining the EU for decades. Every country has a veto and France will have...
  • User AvatarMatt (Bristol) 5th May - 11:43am
    Good luck to everyone standing in Bristol!
  • User AvatarWilliam Jones 5th May - 10:57am
    In Trafford we have two fabulous new members standing in wards here. @simonlepori Gorse Hill and @meenaminnis in Brooklands. They have also added energy and...
  • User AvatarJonathan Ferguson 5th May - 10:53am
    Lorenzo: Further to your comment, I guess this might be a case of 'attack the idea, not the person.' The latter is not a moral...
  • User AvatarJonathan Ferguson 5th May - 10:49am
    Thank you, Lorenzo. I think that people underestimate sometimes the good that Nick Clegg has done, including as a 'public communicator,' for want of a...