Tag Archives: khat

Opinion: Lib Dems only party to vote against khat drug ban

Julian Huppert, Lib Dem PPC for Cambridge“To ban, or not to ban, khat is the question”, tweeted Julian Huppert on Monday morning. Unfortunately, Labour MPs later in the day joined their Tory (and DUP) counterparts in a statutory instrument committee to vote in favour of a ban. The two Lib Dem MPs, Huppert and Greg Mulholland, were defeated 16-2 and the khat trade now looks set to be criminalised.

On The Guardian website, Julian writes:

a mild stimulant – roughly on a par with a strong cup of coffee. It is not considered particularly addictive, and there’s no clear evidence that it causes either physical or social harms. It is imported perfectly legally, and taxes are paid on it, to the tune of £12.8m each year.

When the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, the government’s expert advisors, were asked to consider khat, they said that it would be “inappropriate and disproportionate” to ban it. The cross-party home affairs select committee, on which I serve, produced a unanimous report opposing a ban. And yet the home secretary plans to do it anyway.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 35 Comments

Opinion: Where is the Liberal Democrat influence over drugs policy?

qatYesterday we learnt that the Home Secretary has decided to ban the drug ‘khat’, against the recommendation of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD). The Lib Dems were reportedly against this move, and the decision lay with Theresa May. This and other decisions suggest that drugs minister Jeremy Browne has been given a script but no power.

The disappointing decision to make khat a Class C drug follows the view of the ACMD in January that it should remain legal (having said the same thing …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 13 Comments

Opinion: we must force the Tories to follow the evidence on khat

I feel sorry for the Academic Council on the Misuse of Drugs. It’s this panel of drug experts’ task to try and inject some sense into our country’s failing drug policy. Sadly, in the latter years of New Labour’s reign, it became the default option to ignore their advice on drug classification. On magic mushrooms, then on cannabis and then again on ecstasy, Labour couldn’t resist ignoring the ACMD, opting instead for populist posturing in an attempt to appear ‘tough’.

The Labour government’s unscientific urges on drug classification were deeply frustrating to Liberal Democrats, and this led us to a 2010 …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 30 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAntony Watts 27th Feb - 11:19am
    I have to confess, though I am a LIbDem member I have my doubts about a simple elected Lords. What we do need to do...
  • User Avatarmatt 27th Feb - 10:31am
    @Catherine Jane Crosland Again thank you. Problem is, it does effect me, or it might in the near future, I don't actually claim PIP at...
  • User AvatarCatherine Jane Crosland 27th Feb - 10:18am
    Matt, I think the rule is that if you were asking for help just for yourself, as an individual, about some personal matter, then you...
  • User AvatarAl 27th Feb - 10:14am
    An anachronism.
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 27th Feb - 10:06am
    Theakes - we lost 86% of our vote between 2010 and 2015. The loss of 28% you refer to was the fall in our share...
  • User Avatartheakes 27th Feb - 9:49am
    Me again: looked at the 2016 Council voting for figures for Gorton, wards of Fallowfield, Gorton N, Gorton S, Levenshulme, Longsight, Rushholme and Whalley Range:...