Tag Archives: khat

Opinion: Lib Dems only party to vote against khat drug ban

Julian Huppert, Lib Dem PPC for Cambridge“To ban, or not to ban, khat is the question”, tweeted Julian Huppert on Monday morning. Unfortunately, Labour MPs later in the day joined their Tory (and DUP) counterparts in a statutory instrument committee to vote in favour of a ban. The two Lib Dem MPs, Huppert and Greg Mulholland, were defeated 16-2 and the khat trade now looks set to be criminalised.

On The Guardian website, Julian writes:

a mild stimulant – roughly on a par with a strong cup of coffee. It is not considered particularly addictive, and there’s no clear evidence that it causes either physical or social harms. It is imported perfectly legally, and taxes are paid on it, to the tune of £12.8m each year.

When the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, the government’s expert advisors, were asked to consider khat, they said that it would be “inappropriate and disproportionate” to ban it. The cross-party home affairs select committee, on which I serve, produced a unanimous report opposing a ban. And yet the home secretary plans to do it anyway.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 35 Comments

Opinion: Where is the Liberal Democrat influence over drugs policy?

qatYesterday we learnt that the Home Secretary has decided to ban the drug ‘khat’, against the recommendation of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD). The Lib Dems were reportedly against this move, and the decision lay with Theresa May. This and other decisions suggest that drugs minister Jeremy Browne has been given a script but no power.

The disappointing decision to make khat a Class C drug follows the view of the ACMD in January that it should remain legal (having said the same thing …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 13 Comments

Opinion: we must force the Tories to follow the evidence on khat

I feel sorry for the Academic Council on the Misuse of Drugs. It’s this panel of drug experts’ task to try and inject some sense into our country’s failing drug policy. Sadly, in the latter years of New Labour’s reign, it became the default option to ignore their advice on drug classification. On magic mushrooms, then on cannabis and then again on ecstasy, Labour couldn’t resist ignoring the ACMD, opting instead for populist posturing in an attempt to appear ‘tough’.

The Labour government’s unscientific urges on drug classification were deeply frustrating to Liberal Democrats, and this led us to a 2010 …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 30 Comments



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJulian Tisi 17th Sep - 4:28pm
    An excellent article. Just a thought - but I wonder if one of the reasons that far more women are opposed to independence is that...
  • User AvatarLinda Forbes 17th Sep - 4:19pm
    Scottish Police Federation being moved to comment on reports of misconduct during independence referendum perhaps lays some of the hyperbole in the media to rest...
  • User AvatarJulian Tisi 17th Sep - 4:15pm
    Yes it was a very strange Huff Post article. Amazing that no-one at Labour thought about what might happen if there was a Yes (if...
  • User AvatarDenis Mollison 17th Sep - 4:06pm
    The "honest conversation" on currency never began because the unionist leaders adopted a rigid but implausible attitude that currency union was impossible. A conversation would...
  • User AvatarRobin Wilde 17th Sep - 4:03pm
    I believe the thinking is that there might be a vote of confidence called and all MPs and support need to be able to rush...
  • User AvatarSimon McGrath 17th Sep - 3:44pm
    @john - you tell me. The local party of which I am chair had two excellent BAME approved candidates applying to be our PPC last...