Tag Archives: khat

Opinion: Lib Dems only party to vote against khat drug ban

Julian Huppert, Lib Dem PPC for Cambridge“To ban, or not to ban, khat is the question”, tweeted Julian Huppert on Monday morning. Unfortunately, Labour MPs later in the day joined their Tory (and DUP) counterparts in a statutory instrument committee to vote in favour of a ban. The two Lib Dem MPs, Huppert and Greg Mulholland, were defeated 16-2 and the khat trade now looks set to be criminalised.

On The Guardian website, Julian writes:

a mild stimulant – roughly on a par with a strong cup of coffee. It is not considered particularly addictive, and there’s no clear evidence that it causes either physical or social harms. It is imported perfectly legally, and taxes are paid on it, to the tune of £12.8m each year.

When the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, the government’s expert advisors, were asked to consider khat, they said that it would be “inappropriate and disproportionate” to ban it. The cross-party home affairs select committee, on which I serve, produced a unanimous report opposing a ban. And yet the home secretary plans to do it anyway.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 35 Comments

Opinion: Where is the Liberal Democrat influence over drugs policy?

qatYesterday we learnt that the Home Secretary has decided to ban the drug ‘khat’, against the recommendation of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD). The Lib Dems were reportedly against this move, and the decision lay with Theresa May. This and other decisions suggest that drugs minister Jeremy Browne has been given a script but no power.

The disappointing decision to make khat a Class C drug follows the view of the ACMD in January that it should remain legal (having said the same thing …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 13 Comments

Opinion: we must force the Tories to follow the evidence on khat

I feel sorry for the Academic Council on the Misuse of Drugs. It’s this panel of drug experts’ task to try and inject some sense into our country’s failing drug policy. Sadly, in the latter years of New Labour’s reign, it became the default option to ignore their advice on drug classification. On magic mushrooms, then on cannabis and then again on ecstasy, Labour couldn’t resist ignoring the ACMD, opting instead for populist posturing in an attempt to appear ‘tough’.

The Labour government’s unscientific urges on drug classification were deeply frustrating to Liberal Democrats, and this led us to a 2010 …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 30 Comments



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Dean 22nd Jul - 6:37pm
    The interesting history provided by Mark Gallagher suggests to me that the Nuremberg and UN concepts are incomplete, and indeed the idea of "self-defence" becomes...
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 22nd Jul - 6:15pm
    "There is no evidence that any major natural resources are running out. The ‘Limits to Growth’ said that this would have happened by now and...
  • User AvatarMorgan Inwood 22nd Jul - 5:51pm
    Last Friday (18th July) Annette Brook and Viscount John Thurso were appointed to the Privy Council
  • User AvatarKerry Hutchinson 22nd Jul - 5:50pm
    So. 4 years on and Iasraeli Forces appeal to Palestinian civilians to leave before the DIME munitions and other bombs fall (Israel being the most...
  • User AvatarMatt Gallagher 22nd Jul - 5:46pm
    Every leader is subject to criticism. It is a part of the job description. However, the passage of time and the long-sighted lens of history...
  • User AvatarAllan 22nd Jul - 5:44pm
    Tony Blair made me ashamed to be British with his war mongor ways, he should have been put in court with President Bush if I...