Tag Archives: khat

Opinion: Lib Dems only party to vote against khat drug ban

Julian Huppert, Lib Dem PPC for Cambridge“To ban, or not to ban, khat is the question”, tweeted Julian Huppert on Monday morning. Unfortunately, Labour MPs later in the day joined their Tory (and DUP) counterparts in a statutory instrument committee to vote in favour of a ban. The two Lib Dem MPs, Huppert and Greg Mulholland, were defeated 16-2 and the khat trade now looks set to be criminalised.

On The Guardian website, Julian writes:

a mild stimulant – roughly on a par with a strong cup of coffee. It is not considered particularly addictive, and there’s no clear evidence that it causes either physical or social harms. It is imported perfectly legally, and taxes are paid on it, to the tune of £12.8m each year.

When the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, the government’s expert advisors, were asked to consider khat, they said that it would be “inappropriate and disproportionate” to ban it. The cross-party home affairs select committee, on which I serve, produced a unanimous report opposing a ban. And yet the home secretary plans to do it anyway.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 32 Comments

Opinion: Where is the Liberal Democrat influence over drugs policy?

qatYesterday we learnt that the Home Secretary has decided to ban the drug ‘khat’, against the recommendation of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD). The Lib Dems were reportedly against this move, and the decision lay with Theresa May. This and other decisions suggest that drugs minister Jeremy Browne has been given a script but no power.

The disappointing decision to make khat a Class C drug follows the view of the ACMD in January that it should remain legal (having said the same thing …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 13 Comments

Opinion: we must force the Tories to follow the evidence on khat

I feel sorry for the Academic Council on the Misuse of Drugs. It’s this panel of drug experts’ task to try and inject some sense into our country’s failing drug policy. Sadly, in the latter years of New Labour’s reign, it became the default option to ignore their advice on drug classification. On magic mushrooms, then on cannabis and then again on ecstasy, Labour couldn’t resist ignoring the ACMD, opting instead for populist posturing in an attempt to appear ‘tough’.

The Labour government’s unscientific urges on drug classification were deeply frustrating to Liberal Democrats, and this led us to a 2010 …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 30 Comments



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPhyllis 17th Apr - 1:26pm
    Joe Otten"Sandy, any coalition will surely involve one or the other of the most incompetent, compassionless and sleazy parties. I struggle to see how being...
  • User AvatarManfarang 17th Apr - 1:24pm
    Denis May as well invent a new religion and be done with it-Cao Dai, Tian Di, Bahai or a bit of Rastafari.
  • User AvatarSteve Griffiths 17th Apr - 1:23pm
    @John Tilley "Anyone fancy a “Think Tank” run by Nick Clegg?" I suspect that would look rather like 'Centre Forum' does now; the only difference...
  • User AvatarDavid White 17th Apr - 1:19pm
    Ermmm...... Will some kind person please remind me: who was the first 'Liberal Democrat Prime Minister'? - Just asking....
  • User AvatarRC 17th Apr - 1:18pm
    Until we get a proper, proportional voting system which reflects what people want rather than just a selected 35% of those who vote (i.e. 20%...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 17th Apr - 12:59pm
    Phyllis reminds us of the facts . It just shows the corrosive impact of working in Coalition with the Conservatives that someone as bright as...