Tag Archives: khat

Opinion: Lib Dems only party to vote against khat drug ban

Julian Huppert, Lib Dem PPC for Cambridge“To ban, or not to ban, khat is the question”, tweeted Julian Huppert on Monday morning. Unfortunately, Labour MPs later in the day joined their Tory (and DUP) counterparts in a statutory instrument committee to vote in favour of a ban. The two Lib Dem MPs, Huppert and Greg Mulholland, were defeated 16-2 and the khat trade now looks set to be criminalised.

On The Guardian website, Julian writes:

a mild stimulant – roughly on a par with a strong cup of coffee. It is not considered particularly addictive, and there’s no clear evidence that it causes either physical or social harms. It is imported perfectly legally, and taxes are paid on it, to the tune of £12.8m each year.

When the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, the government’s expert advisors, were asked to consider khat, they said that it would be “inappropriate and disproportionate” to ban it. The cross-party home affairs select committee, on which I serve, produced a unanimous report opposing a ban. And yet the home secretary plans to do it anyway.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 35 Comments

Opinion: Where is the Liberal Democrat influence over drugs policy?

qatYesterday we learnt that the Home Secretary has decided to ban the drug ‘khat’, against the recommendation of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD). The Lib Dems were reportedly against this move, and the decision lay with Theresa May. This and other decisions suggest that drugs minister Jeremy Browne has been given a script but no power.

The disappointing decision to make khat a Class C drug follows the view of the ACMD in January that it should remain legal (having said the same thing …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 13 Comments

Opinion: we must force the Tories to follow the evidence on khat

I feel sorry for the Academic Council on the Misuse of Drugs. It’s this panel of drug experts’ task to try and inject some sense into our country’s failing drug policy. Sadly, in the latter years of New Labour’s reign, it became the default option to ignore their advice on drug classification. On magic mushrooms, then on cannabis and then again on ecstasy, Labour couldn’t resist ignoring the ACMD, opting instead for populist posturing in an attempt to appear ‘tough’.

The Labour government’s unscientific urges on drug classification were deeply frustrating to Liberal Democrats, and this led us to a 2010 …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 30 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMartin 28th Jul - 1:39pm
    Expats: "if I find far more in common with Corbyn" Just how confused and incoherent do you have to be on Brexit?
  • User AvatarAndrew McCaig 28th Jul - 1:29pm
    Maybe someone can go through the manifesto and tell me how many of the proposals in it had been voted on in Conference.. I suspect...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 28th Jul - 1:28pm
    Palehorse, The Liberals spent about 30 years hoping that something would turn up in the first half of the 20th Century and instead plummeted from...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 28th Jul - 1:22pm
    @expats "A shame for the party as, if I find far more in common with Corbyn, so must many others…." Ah, there we have it....
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 28th Jul - 1:13pm
    nvelope, I am afraid you are totally mistaken. In depth analysis by electoral calculus showed that the Lib Dems lost net support to all other...
  • User AvatarLinni 28th Jul - 12:38pm
    I have to confess, the first thing I expected of a Ieader when I joined was to be elected... Failing that, I'd expect them to...
Wed 2nd Aug 2017
Thu 3rd Aug 2017
Mon 21st Aug 2017