Tag Archives: khat

Opinion: Lib Dems only party to vote against khat drug ban

Julian Huppert, Lib Dem PPC for Cambridge“To ban, or not to ban, khat is the question”, tweeted Julian Huppert on Monday morning. Unfortunately, Labour MPs later in the day joined their Tory (and DUP) counterparts in a statutory instrument committee to vote in favour of a ban. The two Lib Dem MPs, Huppert and Greg Mulholland, were defeated 16-2 and the khat trade now looks set to be criminalised.

On The Guardian website, Julian writes:

a mild stimulant – roughly on a par with a strong cup of coffee. It is not considered particularly addictive, and there’s no clear evidence that it causes either physical or social harms. It is imported perfectly legally, and taxes are paid on it, to the tune of £12.8m each year.

When the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, the government’s expert advisors, were asked to consider khat, they said that it would be “inappropriate and disproportionate” to ban it. The cross-party home affairs select committee, on which I serve, produced a unanimous report opposing a ban. And yet the home secretary plans to do it anyway.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 35 Comments

Opinion: Where is the Liberal Democrat influence over drugs policy?

qatYesterday we learnt that the Home Secretary has decided to ban the drug ‘khat’, against the recommendation of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD). The Lib Dems were reportedly against this move, and the decision lay with Theresa May. This and other decisions suggest that drugs minister Jeremy Browne has been given a script but no power.

The disappointing decision to make khat a Class C drug follows the view of the ACMD in January that it should remain legal (having said the same thing …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 13 Comments

Opinion: we must force the Tories to follow the evidence on khat

I feel sorry for the Academic Council on the Misuse of Drugs. It’s this panel of drug experts’ task to try and inject some sense into our country’s failing drug policy. Sadly, in the latter years of New Labour’s reign, it became the default option to ignore their advice on drug classification. On magic mushrooms, then on cannabis and then again on ecstasy, Labour couldn’t resist ignoring the ACMD, opting instead for populist posturing in an attempt to appear ‘tough’.

The Labour government’s unscientific urges on drug classification were deeply frustrating to Liberal Democrats, and this led us to a 2010 …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 30 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarnigel hunter 25th May - 11:43pm
    As far as I am concerned this whole referendum was totally unwanted, devisive and could lead the country into a n uncertain position that does...
  • User AvatarBarry Snelson 25th May - 11:20pm
    Mr Speaker, Blah blah blah "Although the licence fee remains the best way of funding the BBC for this Charter period, it is likely to...
  • User AvatarStuart 25th May - 11:12pm
    @Neal "There will be no driverless cars for sale until after it is proven they are safer than human operated vehicles." I certainly hope so....
  • User AvatarStuart 25th May - 10:50pm
    @Barry I remember the ‘old days’ when any debate on the BBC would have been unthinkable and we sat round together watching Morecambe and Wise....
  • User AvatarStevan Rose 25th May - 10:41pm
    The Heathrow ULTra system seems like a far more likely model for future rapid transit.
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 25th May - 10:33pm
    Or you could look at it as investment in particularly poorer areas which wouldn't have been made otherwise. And I'd say that what we get...