Tag Archives: khat

Opinion: Lib Dems only party to vote against khat drug ban

Julian Huppert, Lib Dem PPC for Cambridge“To ban, or not to ban, khat is the question”, tweeted Julian Huppert on Monday morning. Unfortunately, Labour MPs later in the day joined their Tory (and DUP) counterparts in a statutory instrument committee to vote in favour of a ban. The two Lib Dem MPs, Huppert and Greg Mulholland, were defeated 16-2 and the khat trade now looks set to be criminalised.

On The Guardian website, Julian writes:

a mild stimulant – roughly on a par with a strong cup of coffee. It is not considered particularly addictive, and there’s no clear evidence that it causes either physical or social harms. It is imported perfectly legally, and taxes are paid on it, to the tune of £12.8m each year.

When the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, the government’s expert advisors, were asked to consider khat, they said that it would be “inappropriate and disproportionate” to ban it. The cross-party home affairs select committee, on which I serve, produced a unanimous report opposing a ban. And yet the home secretary plans to do it anyway.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 35 Comments

Opinion: Where is the Liberal Democrat influence over drugs policy?

qatYesterday we learnt that the Home Secretary has decided to ban the drug ‘khat’, against the recommendation of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD). The Lib Dems were reportedly against this move, and the decision lay with Theresa May. This and other decisions suggest that drugs minister Jeremy Browne has been given a script but no power.

The disappointing decision to make khat a Class C drug follows the view of the ACMD in January that it should remain legal (having said the same thing …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 13 Comments

Opinion: we must force the Tories to follow the evidence on khat

I feel sorry for the Academic Council on the Misuse of Drugs. It’s this panel of drug experts’ task to try and inject some sense into our country’s failing drug policy. Sadly, in the latter years of New Labour’s reign, it became the default option to ignore their advice on drug classification. On magic mushrooms, then on cannabis and then again on ecstasy, Labour couldn’t resist ignoring the ACMD, opting instead for populist posturing in an attempt to appear ‘tough’.

The Labour government’s unscientific urges on drug classification were deeply frustrating to Liberal Democrats, and this led us to a 2010 …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 30 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPaul In Wokingham 1st Nov - 11:25am
    The comments by Liberal luminaries and the BTL comments from all wings of the party reinforce a point that has been made many times: Mr....
  • User AvatarTerry 1st Nov - 11:25am
    I favour an overseas appointment, too. I don't see why a judge from overseas could not be given the authority to compel testimony by Parliament....
  • User AvatarTerry 1st Nov - 11:17am
    But it is the leadership, isn't it? Personally, I don't want to be publicly associated with the current leadership among my friends and acquaintances, because...
  • User Avatarpaul barker 1st Nov - 11:07am
    The low numbers of Libdem candidates in Local Byelections is terrible news, both for what it says about our morale & for the the further...
  • User AvatarJenny Barnes 1st Nov - 10:48am
    tpfkar > sometimes there is no-one from the local party who wants to stand.
  • User AvatarStuart 1st Nov - 10:34am
    @Helen Tedcastle "it beggars belief that a party which claims to be both democratic and participatory, ‘decided’ not to stand someone and that the Leader...