Tag Archives: lancet

Opinion: The Nutt affair – or, the thin line between evidence and policy

Firstly, a disclaimer: I am a scientist, who is also interested in governance and politics, so the following post may come across as somewhat heated. Apologies, but I do feel that the recent furore over Prof. David Nutt’s sacking as Chair of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) goes right to the heart of why I took up both science and politics as profession and interest respectively.

We begin with Prof. Nutt’s most recent criticism of the government’s drugs policy, which attracted headlines for claiming that alcohol, despite being legal and freely available, was more harmful than the Class A narcotic ecstasy (MDMA). At first sight this may seem like an outlandish statement to make, but the evidence, collated by Prof. Nutt, suggests otherwise; granted, the recent publication from Nutt’s The Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (CCJS) at King’s College London wasn’t peer-reviewed, but the methodologies used to calculate his ‘harm index’ were so, and published in one of the most respected medical journals, The Lancet in 2007 (the full article is behind a paywall, contact me if you want the pdf…). Just to repeat this – using what seems to me to be a robust method, taking into account everything from physical harm to the user to social harms at large, ecstasy does indeed seem to be less dangerous than alcohol, and it’s using this tried and tested method of enquiry that Nutt used to conclude that cannabis should remain a class C drug.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , , , , , and | 9 Comments



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRoger Heape 17th Sep - 5:56am
    Maria as a matter of urgency I suggest an emergency motion for conference on a Federal Uk in the light of the Scottish referendum result.It...
  • User AvatarDavid-1 17th Sep - 3:30am
    Any devolved units within England will ultimately be arbitrary. They will develop their individual identities in the future, as a result of their people having...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 17th Sep - 2:04am
    It seems I am missing the strength of the desire to "kick Westminster". I've tried using rational arguments, about not weakening the state or adding...
  • User AvatarDavid-1 17th Sep - 1:42am
    The one thing I know is that if No wins, the establishment response will immediately be "we've had enough of talking about the silly Scots...
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 17th Sep - 12:41am
    What's wrong is excessive expectations. As an Englishman, I would prefer a "no", because a yes will cost us all money, especially Scotland. If I...
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 17th Sep - 12:27am
    We should all pause for reflection. Focuses are not the answer. They do not provide genuine accountability for devolved government. They are one party's view....