Tag Archives: lancet

Opinion: The Nutt affair – or, the thin line between evidence and policy

Firstly, a disclaimer: I am a scientist, who is also interested in governance and politics, so the following post may come across as somewhat heated. Apologies, but I do feel that the recent furore over Prof. David Nutt’s sacking as Chair of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) goes right to the heart of why I took up both science and politics as profession and interest respectively.

We begin with Prof. Nutt’s most recent criticism of the government’s drugs policy, which attracted headlines for claiming that alcohol, despite being legal and freely available, was more harmful than the Class A narcotic ecstasy (MDMA). At first sight this may seem like an outlandish statement to make, but the evidence, collated by Prof. Nutt, suggests otherwise; granted, the recent publication from Nutt’s The Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (CCJS) at King’s College London wasn’t peer-reviewed, but the methodologies used to calculate his ‘harm index’ were so, and published in one of the most respected medical journals, The Lancet in 2007 (the full article is behind a paywall, contact me if you want the pdf…). Just to repeat this – using what seems to me to be a robust method, taking into account everything from physical harm to the user to social harms at large, ecstasy does indeed seem to be less dangerous than alcohol, and it’s using this tried and tested method of enquiry that Nutt used to conclude that cannabis should remain a class C drug.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , , , , , and | 9 Comments

Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter Hellyer 30th Nov - 4:55pm
    @Jonathan Brown As noted elsewhere, http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-members-survey-on-syrian-airstrikes-now-live-48451.html Farron's Condition 4 cannot be achieved – saying that the Government should be “absolutely clear on what Syria and...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 30th Nov - 4:52pm
    Sorry, I mean Cameron should be given tough limits, just to clarify. The real propaganda blow comes from civilian casualties. People don't hold up signs...
  • User AvatarThomasS 30th Nov - 4:37pm
    @expats I didn't say a worse disaster I said sooner - i.e. for the parliamentary party.
  • User AvatarToby Fenwick 30th Nov - 4:34pm
    @Martin: any attack would have to show that the harm caused was proportionate to the military advantage gained, and the Geneva Conventions bans any attack...
  • User Avatardavid thorpe 30th Nov - 4:30pm
    I usually agree with Nick-but not this time
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 30th Nov - 4:27pm
    I think as long as Cameron isn't given a blank cheque and tough limits it should be fine. The threat of terrorism can never be...