Tag Archives: limehouse declaration

Dick Newby writes … revisiting the Limehouse Declaration

William Rodgers, Shirley Williams, Roy Jenkins & David Owen with funds from SDP supporters, Feb 1981On the wall of our downstairs loo is a framed copy of the Limehouse Declaration, issued at the inception of the SDP on 21 January 1981.

In the light of Matthew Oakeshott’s parting contention that Nick has led us as a party without roots, principles or values, I have re-read it to test his contention.

On international affairs the post-2010 Lib Dems have followed Limehouse to the letter – not just by being rooted and principled over Europe, but by our record on international development – underpinned by giving 0.7% of GDP in aid for the first time ever.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 17 Comments

“It was a tough battle” – Shirley Williams on the birth of the SDP

Shirley Williams tells the story of the 1981 Gang of Four breakaway, which eventually led to the formation of the Liberal Democrats, in the first issue of AD LIB magazine, out next week.

“…we said, if we haven’t got anywhere else to go, we’ll create one.”

Those nascent views crystallised after the party’s 1981 Wembley conference which committed it to unilateral nuclear disarmament and withdrawal from the EEC and NATO. Within hours Williams, Owen and Rodgers were drawing up the plans which would lead to the creation of the SDP.

“The three of us met – not Roy, at that point –

Posted in News | Also tagged , , and | 11 Comments

Question: Big or small government? Answer: effective

One prominent member of Liberal Youth hits the nail on the head when she says ‘ frankly sick of all this I’m a social liberal so I’m a better Lib Demno it’s Orange Bookers that are real Lib Dems… we’re in the same party ffs.’

And the contrasting Economist correspondent missed the target by a mile when he wrote – following our last conference – that ‘the Liberal Democrats are still in denial about their innate dividedness.’

You see according to this correspondent – quoted again in The Week – he has had a brilliant insight: ‘You cannot be both for, and against, the Big State.’ But whilst his truism is logically …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 8 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarLaurence Cox 28th Mar - 10:58am
    The problem with the Liberal Democrats' position on defence is that since Lord Garden's untimely death in 2007, we have not had any senior politician...
  • User AvatarLyn 28th Mar - 10:57am
    Actually, I'm not sure that I would mind giving up my UK citizenship for a EU citizenship if a separate EU citizenship existed. In fact,...
  • User AvatarRob Parsons 28th Mar - 10:46am
    I very much like the implication that Jeremy Corbyn was designed not to be used.
  • User Avatarfrankie 28th Mar - 10:22am
    @David Evans I was in deep moderation David. I upset people by screaming "Your making a terrible mistake". I must admit after awhile of screaming...
  • User AvatarCassieB 28th Mar - 10:05am
    ethics gradient: that is interesting, having never played the game. Though I suspect May and co have 2 of hearts, 6 of clubs, and a...
  • User AvatarLester Holloway 28th Mar - 9:39am
    Mark, Surely getting to the point of being in a coalition involves having a plan for upliftment of people in the nations of Africa? As...