Tag Archives: limehouse declaration

Dick Newby writes … revisiting the Limehouse Declaration

William Rodgers, Shirley Williams, Roy Jenkins & David Owen with funds from SDP supporters, Feb 1981On the wall of our downstairs loo is a framed copy of the Limehouse Declaration, issued at the inception of the SDP on 21 January 1981.

In the light of Matthew Oakeshott’s parting contention that Nick has led us as a party without roots, principles or values, I have re-read it to test his contention.

On international affairs the post-2010 Lib Dems have followed Limehouse to the letter – not just by being rooted and principled over Europe, but by our record on international development – underpinned by giving 0.7% of GDP in aid for the first time ever.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 17 Comments

“It was a tough battle” – Shirley Williams on the birth of the SDP

Shirley Williams tells the story of the 1981 Gang of Four breakaway, which eventually led to the formation of the Liberal Democrats, in the first issue of AD LIB magazine, out next week.

“…we said, if we haven’t got anywhere else to go, we’ll create one.”

Those nascent views crystallised after the party’s 1981 Wembley conference which committed it to unilateral nuclear disarmament and withdrawal from the EEC and NATO. Within hours Williams, Owen and Rodgers were drawing up the plans which would lead to the creation of the SDP.

“The three of us met – not Roy, at that point –

Posted in News | Also tagged , , and | 11 Comments

Question: Big or small government? Answer: effective

One prominent member of Liberal Youth hits the nail on the head when she says ‘ frankly sick of all this I’m a social liberal so I’m a better Lib Demno it’s Orange Bookers that are real Lib Dems… we’re in the same party ffs.’

And the contrasting Economist correspondent missed the target by a mile when he wrote – following our last conference – that ‘the Liberal Democrats are still in denial about their innate dividedness.’

You see according to this correspondent – quoted again in The Week – he has had a brilliant insight: ‘You cannot be both for, and against, the Big State.’ But whilst his truism is logically …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 8 Comments

Most Read

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 11th Dec - 11:59am
    The Andrew Marr Show on 11/12/16 is worth a look. We wish him a speedy recovery. He was replaced for one week by Nick Robinson...
  • User AvatarPeter Andrews 11th Dec - 11:54am
    Oh and by the way I speak as someone who is due to go to court as a victim of a burglary where two burglars...
  • User AvatarGraham Evans 11th Dec - 11:53am
    One of the potential political hazards of economic decline as a result of Brexit is that instead of blaming the Brexiteers and the Tory government,...
  • User AvatarPeter Andrews 11th Dec - 11:50am
    I actually totally agree that ex-prisoners should not have to disclose their convictions on all job applications. Making them do so is a sure fire...
  • User AvatarLeekliberal 11th Dec - 11:46am
    As one of the 48%, another benefit of a 2nd referendum when the terms of any brexit deal are clear, is that if we vote...
  • User AvatarDJ 11th Dec - 11:41am
    Whatever the horrors and limitations of Cuba under Fidel Castro, I do not think they are best represented by a boxer having to stay amateur....