Tag Archives: limehouse declaration

Dick Newby writes … revisiting the Limehouse Declaration

William Rodgers, Shirley Williams, Roy Jenkins & David Owen with funds from SDP supporters, Feb 1981On the wall of our downstairs loo is a framed copy of the Limehouse Declaration, issued at the inception of the SDP on 21 January 1981.

In the light of Matthew Oakeshott’s parting contention that Nick has led us as a party without roots, principles or values, I have re-read it to test his contention.

On international affairs the post-2010 Lib Dems have followed Limehouse to the letter – not just by being rooted and principled over Europe, but by our record on international development – underpinned by giving 0.7% of GDP in aid for the first time ever.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 17 Comments

“It was a tough battle” – Shirley Williams on the birth of the SDP

Shirley Williams tells the story of the 1981 Gang of Four breakaway, which eventually led to the formation of the Liberal Democrats, in the first issue of AD LIB magazine, out next week.

“…we said, if we haven’t got anywhere else to go, we’ll create one.”

Those nascent views crystallised after the party’s 1981 Wembley conference which committed it to unilateral nuclear disarmament and withdrawal from the EEC and NATO. Within hours Williams, Owen and Rodgers were drawing up the plans which would lead to the creation of the SDP.

“The three of us met – not Roy, at that point –

Posted in News | Also tagged , , and | 11 Comments

Question: Big or small government? Answer: effective

One prominent member of Liberal Youth hits the nail on the head when she says ‘ frankly sick of all this I’m a social liberal so I’m a better Lib Demno it’s Orange Bookers that are real Lib Dems… we’re in the same party ffs.’

And the contrasting Economist correspondent missed the target by a mile when he wrote – following our last conference – that ‘the Liberal Democrats are still in denial about their innate dividedness.’

You see according to this correspondent – quoted again in The Week – he has had a brilliant insight: ‘You cannot be both for, and against, the Big State.’ But whilst his truism is logically …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 8 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 25th Sep - 8:33am
    Uber want to negotiate. Why not just comply? It was said on Any Answers? that Uber used their license in London to go national, picking...
  • User AvatarDaniel Carr 25th Sep - 8:20am
    This is a good thread on the evidence around Uber's alleged poor record in London: https://twitter.com/paul_a_smith/status/911933427410259968 I'm happy to believe otherwise (that Uber are substantially...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 25th Sep - 8:19am
    The appointment of the former Mayor of Greater London to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office was a surprise. Maybe he could learn on the job,...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 25th Sep - 8:03am
    Team Europe won the Laver Cup beating Team World 11 - 9.
  • User Avatartheakes 25th Sep - 7:47am
    Good to see the FDP back in the German Parliament after their 2013 wipeout, with nearly 11% and 80 seats. Notice not a word about...
  • User AvatarMark Platt 25th Sep - 4:34am
    Besides the concerns already listed against Uber for me there is also an additional issue, unconsidered thus far. In London, the combination of 'instant deliveries',...