Tag Archives: limehouse declaration

Dick Newby writes … revisiting the Limehouse Declaration

William Rodgers, Shirley Williams, Roy Jenkins & David Owen with funds from SDP supporters, Feb 1981On the wall of our downstairs loo is a framed copy of the Limehouse Declaration, issued at the inception of the SDP on 21 January 1981.

In the light of Matthew Oakeshott’s parting contention that Nick has led us as a party without roots, principles or values, I have re-read it to test his contention.

On international affairs the post-2010 Lib Dems have followed Limehouse to the letter – not just by being rooted and principled over Europe, but by our record on international development – underpinned by giving 0.7% of GDP in aid for the first time ever.

photo by: Roger Blackwell
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 17 Comments

“It was a tough battle” – Shirley Williams on the birth of the SDP

Shirley Williams tells the story of the 1981 Gang of Four breakaway, which eventually led to the formation of the Liberal Democrats, in the first issue of AD LIB magazine, out next week.

“…we said, if we haven’t got anywhere else to go, we’ll create one.”

Those nascent views crystallised after the party’s 1981 Wembley conference which committed it to unilateral nuclear disarmament and withdrawal from the EEC and NATO. Within hours Williams, Owen and Rodgers were drawing up the plans which would lead to the creation of the SDP.

“The three of us met – not Roy, at that point –

Posted in News | Also tagged , , and | 11 Comments

Question: Big or small government? Answer: effective

One prominent member of Liberal Youth hits the nail on the head when she says ‘ frankly sick of all this I’m a social liberal so I’m a better Lib Demno it’s Orange Bookers that are real Lib Dems… we’re in the same party ffs.’

And the contrasting Economist correspondent missed the target by a mile when he wrote – following our last conference – that ‘the Liberal Democrats are still in denial about their innate dividedness.’

You see according to this correspondent – quoted again in The Week – he has had a brilliant insight: ‘You cannot be both for, and against, the Big State.’ But whilst his truism is logically …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 8 Comments

Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJudy Abel 28th Nov - 11:33pm
    All that counts is the medical evidence of the best experts in the field - and the protection of patients. Any other considerations are surely...
  • User AvatarBruce 28th Nov - 11:33pm
    there are a number of points here. Firstly the border is literally a line in the sand. It has no logical purpose being based on...
  • User AvatarMick Taylor 28th Nov - 10:58pm
    Some years ago, the British Government refused to negotiate with the IRA and the IRA continued to carry out fairly indiscriminate acts of terrorism. Many...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 28th Nov - 10:01pm
    Is it still the cae that police officers need to choose a jacket that protects against knives? or a jacket that protects against guns?
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 28th Nov - 9:59pm
    In other words, Lloyd, we need to unpick Sykes Picot and start again. But first, there's the little matter of ISIS and Mr Assad.
  • User Avatarlloyd harris 28th Nov - 9:28pm
    Personally I can't see how bombing is going to get rid of ISIS just like it hasn't got rid of Al Qidea (?spelling) it is...