Tag Archives: limehouse declaration

Dick Newby writes … revisiting the Limehouse Declaration

William Rodgers, Shirley Williams, Roy Jenkins & David Owen with funds from SDP supporters, Feb 1981On the wall of our downstairs loo is a framed copy of the Limehouse Declaration, issued at the inception of the SDP on 21 January 1981.

In the light of Matthew Oakeshott’s parting contention that Nick has led us as a party without roots, principles or values, I have re-read it to test his contention.

On international affairs the post-2010 Lib Dems have followed Limehouse to the letter – not just by being rooted and principled over Europe, but by our record on international development – underpinned by giving 0.7% of GDP in aid for the first time ever.

photo by: Roger Blackwell
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 17 Comments

“It was a tough battle” – Shirley Williams on the birth of the SDP

Shirley Williams tells the story of the 1981 Gang of Four breakaway, which eventually led to the formation of the Liberal Democrats, in the first issue of AD LIB magazine, out next week.

“…we said, if we haven’t got anywhere else to go, we’ll create one.”

Those nascent views crystallised after the party’s 1981 Wembley conference which committed it to unilateral nuclear disarmament and withdrawal from the EEC and NATO. Within hours Williams, Owen and Rodgers were drawing up the plans which would lead to the creation of the SDP.

“The three of us met – not Roy, at that point –

Posted in News | Also tagged , , and | 11 Comments

Question: Big or small government? Answer: effective

One prominent member of Liberal Youth hits the nail on the head when she says ‘ frankly sick of all this I’m a social liberal so I’m a better Lib Demno it’s Orange Bookers that are real Lib Dems… we’re in the same party ffs.’

And the contrasting Economist correspondent missed the target by a mile when he wrote – following our last conference – that ‘the Liberal Democrats are still in denial about their innate dividedness.’

You see according to this correspondent – quoted again in The Week – he has had a brilliant insight: ‘You cannot be both for, and against, the Big State.’ But whilst his truism is logically …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 8 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJoeBourke 31st Aug - 6:39pm
    The refugee crisis is a complex issue that will require a multi-tiered approach as was the case in the immediate aftermath of WWII Many of...
  • User AvatarJayne mansfield 31st Aug - 6:35pm
    @ Richard Stallard, The places that they are fleeing to initially are Turkey, Lebanon and Jordon, but the numbers are likely to destabilise those countries....
  • User AvatarPeter Chambers 31st Aug - 6:28pm
    @AndrewMcC Your point about Green authoritarianism is well taken. Taking the political compass at face value the UK Greens should be on the economic Left,...
  • User AvatarJoe Otten 31st Aug - 6:04pm
    Er, just to be clear, jedibeeftrix is not a party member, so everybody who is leaping to judgments about the party based on what he...
  • User Avatardavid thorpe 31st Aug - 5:56pm
    the definition i used is that applied in international law-;people apply for asylum claiming refugee staus and if their case is valid are granted refugee...
  • User AvatarDavidW 31st Aug - 5:55pm
    @Maria "Just wondering…. is it possible to be radical and moderate at the same time?" Hah, not really. Neither is it possible to believe in...