Tag Archives: limehouse declaration

Dick Newby writes … revisiting the Limehouse Declaration

William Rodgers, Shirley Williams, Roy Jenkins & David Owen with funds from SDP supporters, Feb 1981On the wall of our downstairs loo is a framed copy of the Limehouse Declaration, issued at the inception of the SDP on 21 January 1981.

In the light of Matthew Oakeshott’s parting contention that Nick has led us as a party without roots, principles or values, I have re-read it to test his contention.

On international affairs the post-2010 Lib Dems have followed Limehouse to the letter – not just by being rooted and principled over Europe, but by our record on international development – underpinned by giving 0.7% of GDP in aid for the first time ever.

photo by: Roger Blackwell
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 17 Comments

“It was a tough battle” – Shirley Williams on the birth of the SDP

Shirley Williams tells the story of the 1981 Gang of Four breakaway, which eventually led to the formation of the Liberal Democrats, in the first issue of AD LIB magazine, out next week.

“…we said, if we haven’t got anywhere else to go, we’ll create one.”

Those nascent views crystallised after the party’s 1981 Wembley conference which committed it to unilateral nuclear disarmament and withdrawal from the EEC and NATO. Within hours Williams, Owen and Rodgers were drawing up the plans which would lead to the creation of the SDP.

“The three of us met – not Roy, at that point –

Posted in News | Also tagged , , and | 11 Comments

Question: Big or small government? Answer: effective

One prominent member of Liberal Youth hits the nail on the head when she says ‘ frankly sick of all this I’m a social liberal so I’m a better Lib Demno it’s Orange Bookers that are real Lib Dems… we’re in the same party ffs.’

And the contrasting Economist correspondent missed the target by a mile when he wrote – following our last conference – that ‘the Liberal Democrats are still in denial about their innate dividedness.’

You see according to this correspondent – quoted again in The Week – he has had a brilliant insight: ‘You cannot be both for, and against, the Big State.’ But whilst his truism is logically …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 8 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDaniel Henry 22nd Nov - 2:07pm
    Good article - I very much agree!
  • User AvatarStevan Rose 22nd Nov - 2:07pm
    Referring to people who seem to believe, from their posts, in "from each according to his ability to each according to his need" as Marxist...
  • User AvatarA Social Liberal 22nd Nov - 1:49pm
    Stuart You are right, internment and exclusion orders were part of the fight against Irish terrorism - they were also a huge recruiting tool for...
  • User AvatarGlenn 22nd Nov - 1:41pm
    Almalric, About 72 % of the population want stricter immigration controls with about 56% wanting much stricter controls. Unlike you I don't think this is...
  • User AvatarStuart 22nd Nov - 1:38pm
    @Sarah Noble "Cooper saying that 'it’s not racist to be worried about immigration'… Labour are sleepwalking into racist reactionaryism" Would you prefer it if Cooper...
  • User AvatarGF 22nd Nov - 1:29pm
    Ross - Thanks for making that point in reply to Andrew Colman which saved me the trouble. As Andrew correctly says no Parliament can restrict...