Tag Archives: limehouse declaration

Dick Newby writes … revisiting the Limehouse Declaration

William Rodgers, Shirley Williams, Roy Jenkins & David Owen with funds from SDP supporters, Feb 1981On the wall of our downstairs loo is a framed copy of the Limehouse Declaration, issued at the inception of the SDP on 21 January 1981.

In the light of Matthew Oakeshott’s parting contention that Nick has led us as a party without roots, principles or values, I have re-read it to test his contention.

On international affairs the post-2010 Lib Dems have followed Limehouse to the letter – not just by being rooted and principled over Europe, but by our record on international development – underpinned by giving 0.7% of GDP in aid for the first time ever.

photo by: Roger Blackwell
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 17 Comments

“It was a tough battle” – Shirley Williams on the birth of the SDP

Shirley Williams tells the story of the 1981 Gang of Four breakaway, which eventually led to the formation of the Liberal Democrats, in the first issue of AD LIB magazine, out next week.

“…we said, if we haven’t got anywhere else to go, we’ll create one.”

Those nascent views crystallised after the party’s 1981 Wembley conference which committed it to unilateral nuclear disarmament and withdrawal from the EEC and NATO. Within hours Williams, Owen and Rodgers were drawing up the plans which would lead to the creation of the SDP.

“The three of us met – not Roy, at that point –

Posted in News | Also tagged , , and | 11 Comments

Question: Big or small government? Answer: effective

One prominent member of Liberal Youth hits the nail on the head when she says ‘ frankly sick of all this I’m a social liberal so I’m a better Lib Demno it’s Orange Bookers that are real Lib Dems… we’re in the same party ffs.’

And the contrasting Economist correspondent missed the target by a mile when he wrote – following our last conference – that ‘the Liberal Democrats are still in denial about their innate dividedness.’

You see according to this correspondent – quoted again in The Week – he has had a brilliant insight: ‘You cannot be both for, and against, the Big State.’ But whilst his truism is logically …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 8 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 1st Mar - 4:29pm
    @Stuart "That’s it. Game over. The Murdoch press hates Labour’s proposals, so Labour must be on the right lines." If you don't like The Times,...
  • User Avatarexpats 1st Mar - 4:29pm
    Well I've learned a lot today....The tripling of 'Tuition Fees' was not a Tory policy (because they didn't have one)....It wasn't a LibDem policy because...
  • User AvatarStuart 1st Mar - 4:20pm
    "It happens that I did precisely that (strictly the edge of a sheet of paper)" And what is the difference (in millimetres) between your sheet...
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 1st Mar - 4:12pm
    @Simon Shaw "Do you agree with me that the current model is essentially the same model as what Labour had?" I have made the same...
  • User AvatarStuart 1st Mar - 4:10pm
    @Simon Shaw "Would that be The Times that yesterday had a leading article headlined: STUDENT POLITICS Labour’s tuition fees plan is wrong in principle and...
  • User AvatarStuart 1st Mar - 4:09pm
    People are overlooking a rather obvious fact when they complain that Labour's policy "does nothing" for poorer graduates. (Apart from the fact that they are...
Sun 1st Mar 2015
Mon 2nd Mar 2015
18:30
Wed 4th Mar 2015
Sat 7th Mar 2015
Sun 8th Mar 2015
Wed 11th Mar 2015
Fri 13th Mar 2015
Sat 14th Mar 2015
Wed 18th Mar 2015
Sat 28th Mar 2015