Tag Archives: limehouse declaration

Dick Newby writes … revisiting the Limehouse Declaration

William Rodgers, Shirley Williams, Roy Jenkins & David Owen with funds from SDP supporters, Feb 1981On the wall of our downstairs loo is a framed copy of the Limehouse Declaration, issued at the inception of the SDP on 21 January 1981.

In the light of Matthew Oakeshott’s parting contention that Nick has led us as a party without roots, principles or values, I have re-read it to test his contention.

On international affairs the post-2010 Lib Dems have followed Limehouse to the letter – not just by being rooted and principled over Europe, but by our record on international development – underpinned by giving 0.7% of GDP in aid for the first time ever.

photo by: Roger Blackwell
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 17 Comments

“It was a tough battle” – Shirley Williams on the birth of the SDP

Shirley Williams tells the story of the 1981 Gang of Four breakaway, which eventually led to the formation of the Liberal Democrats, in the first issue of AD LIB magazine, out next week.

“…we said, if we haven’t got anywhere else to go, we’ll create one.”

Those nascent views crystallised after the party’s 1981 Wembley conference which committed it to unilateral nuclear disarmament and withdrawal from the EEC and NATO. Within hours Williams, Owen and Rodgers were drawing up the plans which would lead to the creation of the SDP.

“The three of us met – not Roy, at that point –

Posted in News | Also tagged , , and | 11 Comments

Question: Big or small government? Answer: effective

One prominent member of Liberal Youth hits the nail on the head when she says ‘ frankly sick of all this I’m a social liberal so I’m a better Lib Demno it’s Orange Bookers that are real Lib Dems… we’re in the same party ffs.’

And the contrasting Economist correspondent missed the target by a mile when he wrote – following our last conference – that ‘the Liberal Democrats are still in denial about their innate dividedness.’

You see according to this correspondent – quoted again in The Week – he has had a brilliant insight: ‘You cannot be both for, and against, the Big State.’ But whilst his truism is logically …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 8 Comments

Recent Comments

  • User AvatarSarah Olney 9th Oct - 9:57am
    "he could do with slowing down his delivery a bit" - and keeping his hands still! He was waving them around in front of his...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 9th Oct - 9:48am
    TCO Yes but that variation is not uniform. Some areas are allowed to provide different sorts of schools and others aren’t. Nicked from Wiki, but...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 9th Oct - 9:34am
    David Wallace The party gave us a conservative government (albeit a fairly moderate one) in exchange for the Tories agreeing to implement some liberal policies....
  • User AvatarPeter 9th Oct - 9:21am
    Paul, Europe is a wonderful continent with diverse countries and great people. I worked in Europe for part of each week for decades. The EU...
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 9th Oct - 9:15am
    An interesting collection tonight. Ms Patel: priti useless, simply singing from the Downing Street songbook. I reckon she could do with her former boss, Zack...
  • User Avatarexpats 9th Oct - 9:05am
    Duncan Stott 9th Oct '15 - 8:02am..... A bit confusing????? You believe in a 'minimum wage' but not in a minimum wage that someone can...