Tag Archives: limehouse declaration

Dick Newby writes … revisiting the Limehouse Declaration

William Rodgers, Shirley Williams, Roy Jenkins & David Owen with funds from SDP supporters, Feb 1981On the wall of our downstairs loo is a framed copy of the Limehouse Declaration, issued at the inception of the SDP on 21 January 1981.

In the light of Matthew Oakeshott’s parting contention that Nick has led us as a party without roots, principles or values, I have re-read it to test his contention.

On international affairs the post-2010 Lib Dems have followed Limehouse to the letter – not just by being rooted and principled over Europe, but by our record on international development – underpinned by giving 0.7% of GDP in aid for the first time ever.

photo by: Roger Blackwell
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 17 Comments

“It was a tough battle” – Shirley Williams on the birth of the SDP

Shirley Williams tells the story of the 1981 Gang of Four breakaway, which eventually led to the formation of the Liberal Democrats, in the first issue of AD LIB magazine, out next week.

“…we said, if we haven’t got anywhere else to go, we’ll create one.”

Those nascent views crystallised after the party’s 1981 Wembley conference which committed it to unilateral nuclear disarmament and withdrawal from the EEC and NATO. Within hours Williams, Owen and Rodgers were drawing up the plans which would lead to the creation of the SDP.

“The three of us met – not Roy, at that point –

Posted in News | Also tagged , , and | 11 Comments

Question: Big or small government? Answer: effective

One prominent member of Liberal Youth hits the nail on the head when she says ‘ frankly sick of all this I’m a social liberal so I’m a better Lib Demno it’s Orange Bookers that are real Lib Dems… we’re in the same party ffs.’

And the contrasting Economist correspondent missed the target by a mile when he wrote – following our last conference – that ‘the Liberal Democrats are still in denial about their innate dividedness.’

You see according to this correspondent – quoted again in The Week – he has had a brilliant insight: ‘You cannot be both for, and against, the Big State.’ But whilst his truism is logically …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 8 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMark Argent 28th Nov - 11:51pm
    It is horrifying to think that something as important as this might be decided by the Tories need to avoid losing a few seats to...
  • User AvatarExiled Scot 28th Nov - 11:48pm
    There were 12 local government by elections on Thursday in which just over 18,000 people voted. Just 305 voted Lib Dem - less than six...
  • User AvatarTim13 28th Nov - 11:43pm
    But who on earth are these 79%? Most people here want to exit the coalition sharpish, eve if many of us originally supported the idea...
  • User AvatarLiberal Al 28th Nov - 11:19pm
    I think to say that Cameron 'led' the UK out of Europe would be overstating his role; Cameron is a weak leader and at best,...
  • User AvatarLiberal Al 28th Nov - 11:04pm
    I think this whole debate of whether Facebook could do this is sort of missing the point. I think the key question is 'should' Facebook...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 28th Nov - 10:43pm
    What did it in for the BNP was BNP councillors. When people found out how utterly useless, incompetent as well as plain thick, the BNP...