Tag Archives: marked registers

Glenrothes by-election marked register set to rise from the dead

A week today, starting at 10am on Monday 16th November, an act of political record keeping resurrection will commence as the lost marked register from the Glenrothes Westminster Parliamentary by-election is recreated.

The lost of the Glenrothes marked register caused more controversy than such loses usually do both because it happened at a Parliamentary by-election and because the result in that election was, to many people, a surprise.

The Goverment’s reaction to the loss of marked registers after the 2005 general election was underwhelming. As I described it in February:

In other words : ‘we don’t know on what dates records were

Posted in Election law and News | Also tagged and | Leave a comment

Missing: one marked register

News via the Press Association:

The SNP demanded an inquiry after it emerged that a record of everyone who voted in last year’s Glenrothes by-election has gone missing.

The party had asked to see the marked registers from November’s crucial by-election – which resulted in a shock victory for Labour.

I’m not hugely surprised by this, as after the 2005 general election there were numerous complaints from people who tried to access the marked register for their constituency about the records being in a poor shape, delayed for long periods on in part missing. The rules then were that marked registers were …

Posted in Election law and News | Also tagged , , and | 6 Comments

Recent Comments

  • User AvatarStephen Campbell 6th May - 2:19pm
    I remember when the Lib Dems used to take the side of the vulnerable and powerless - versus taking the side of those with power....
  • User AvatarJudy Abel 6th May - 2:16pm
    Lib Dem MPs still believe in the same values as in 2010. Yes, we got the tuition fees thing wrong (and I, perhaps idealistically, still...
  • User AvatarStephen Campbell 6th May - 2:06pm
    @Gwyn Griffiths: "The idea that you should never, ever change any benefit because somebody who loses out may die is absurd." So, in other words,...
  • User AvatarDavid-1 6th May - 2:00pm
    Since the current coalition comprises two parties which both failed to achieve majorities in 2010, is it not also a "coalition of the losers"?
  • User AvatarSamuel Griffiths 6th May - 1:56pm
    Matthew Huntbach: You make excellent arguments for why we need PR in this country and I certainly agree that tactical voting is causing us to...
  • User AvatarRuth 6th May - 1:55pm
    Hi Tinter, this wasn't my tuition fee maths. It came from the gov.uk and the link is in the text. I agree with you that...