Tag Archives: nick herbert

How Parliament walked eyes wide open into the Bob Ashford mess

Would-be Labour Police and Crime Commissioner candidate Bob Ashford is rightly getting a positive press and sympathy from across the political spectrum today for discovering he’s disqualified from standing thanks to a £5 fine he paid 46 years ago.

It is absurd that he can’t stand. It is an absurdity that Parliament deliberately decided to enact, for the ban does not arise from unintended side effects of another measure or from poor drafting. Instead, it was a deliberate decision to introduce an unprecedented restriction on who can stand in the Police …

Posted in Election law | Also tagged , and | 11 Comments

Gay rights – what will you believe: the Tory spin or the Tory voting record?

Bless Nick Herbert: he’s doing his best today to make the claim that the Tories’ attitudes to homosexuality have changed, and that gay people should trust the party. The trouble is Nick has to contend with the reality of the Tories’ voting record – which, as the Lib Dems have pointed out, shows what the Tory party really believes.

The voting records of current Tory MPs who are standing again in 2010 show that:

  • One in six voted against the repeal of Section 28 in 2003 – including David Cameron and a third of the Tory shadow cabinet;
  • One in

Posted in News | Also tagged , , , , and | 5 Comments

All aboard the new quango train, Conservative Party style

Toot toot! Hold tight! Another one coming on board the quango express.

It’s another new quango promised by the Conservatives with, as the Telegraph has reported,

Nick Herbert, shadow minister for farming and environment, promising a farmers’ conference that a future Conservative government will implement the Competition Commission’s recommendation to create an ombudsman to rule on disputes between supermarkets and their suppliers. That is one more quango to add to the already long list: perhaps they should call it Offtrolley.

Ah, you say. But that’s an ok quango. Surely there’s room for a bit of flexibility?

Only problem is, it’s an awful lot …

Posted in News | Also tagged and | 2 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJames Baillie 31st May - 8:43pm
    I didn't necessarily mean "more integrated" by "stronger", Stevan, "more stable and durable" was more what I was getting at. Not voting is of course...
  • User AvatarStevan Rose 31st May - 8:39pm
    http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/05/vote-leaves-50-million-question/ explains the purpose of the 50 million exercise. It is a data gathering exercise and is structured to make a jackpot winner more or...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 31st May - 8:35pm
    @ Peter Davies A tad disingenuous, Peter. That's not how 48% of Lib Dem voters saw it at the time...... so would say they were...
  • User AvatarRoland 31st May - 8:29pm
    What Remain will mean for publicly funded science The European Union's Competitiveness Council has unanimously agreed a proposal to make all scientific papers arising from...
  • User AvatarStevan Rose 31st May - 8:27pm
    I agree James, the Commission can be budged with the will of the Council and/or the Parliament. Or the threat of either/both. It is odd...
  • User AvatarJayne Mansfield 31st May - 8:20pm
    nvelope 2003, I have moved in the opposite direction to you. I used to agree with a licence fee but now believe that new technology...