Tag Archives: parliament act

Opinion: Lib Dem MPs must vote against the health reforms – not for health, but for democracy

Lately, we have heard much about Andrew Lansley’s proposed reforms of the NHS, both from within the party and without.

Grassroots site ‘Conservative Home’ writer Tim Montgomerie came out in opposition to the bill, calling it ‘unnecessary and unpopular’. Lansley’s supporters have been less professional in their counter-briefing.

Lib Dems on all sides are throwing their all in to the debate about the biggest shake up to our health service in decades. I’ve found it difficult to have an opinion on either side – so as the debate has flamed around me, i’ve noticed a trend that I find very

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 14 Comments

LibLink: Mark Pack – The secret concessions behind the 1911 Parliament Act

Before he departed for his blogging holiday, The Voice’s Mark Pack had an interesting piece on the Total Politics site looking at the 100-year history of the 1911 Parliament Act.

Here’s an extract from Mark’s piece:

The 1911 Act had its immediate cause in the 1909 People’s Budget from Liberal Chancellor of the Exchequer, David Lloyd George, which raised taxes for the richest to pay for military armaments and social works. As he put it:

“This is a war Budget. It is for raising money to wage implacable warfare against poverty and squalidness.”

The sums now seem modest – including the equivalent in today’s

Posted in LibLink | Also tagged and | Leave a comment

Moving to an elected second chamber – a loss of expertise, or just privilege?

August 2011 is the centenary of the Parliament Act, the supposedly stop gap measure to regulate relations between the two houses of parliament until an elected House of Lords could be created. The fact that we are still fighting for a democratic second chamber means it is all too easy to lose sight of the debates about what we want the second chamber to actually do. Unlock Democracy wants a fully elected second chamber capable of scrutinising and revising legislation as well as delaying it where necessary. It should be a deliberative chamber that builds on the …

Posted in Parliament | Also tagged , , and | 9 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 26th Apr - 8:14pm
    Hi Stephen, I'm going to chat with Denis over email before I post any more on the topic. I have reservations, but maybe they will...
  • User AvatarMartin 26th Apr - 8:10pm
    Bill: Actually I think Cameron could try to carry on and also dare other parties to vote him down (which Lab + SNP probably would)....
  • User AvatarColin 26th Apr - 8:05pm
    * er 'a confidence motion' I mean. Or the conservatives table a no-confidence motion.
  • User AvatarColin 26th Apr - 8:02pm
    " Can you see a situation in which the House voted against the QS and then for the vote of confidence?" Yes. The SNP votes...
  • User AvatarStephen Hesketh 26th Apr - 7:41pm
    Eddie Sammon 26th Apr '15 - 6:04pm "I’m still open minded, but I am frustrated at the way STV is held up like some sort...
  • User AvatarBill le Breton 26th Apr - 7:37pm
    David 1 - the distinction between a Queens Speech and the precise motion set down by the FTPA is not material. The PM would press...