Tag Archives: parliamentary boundary review

Paul Tyler writes: Boundary changes focus the minds of Tory hopefuls

If you think Tory rivalry is at fever pitch, you ain’t seen nothing yet.  The accidental coincidence of the forthcoming constituency boundary changes with the aftermath of the EU Referendum campaign may come to haunt David Cameron or his successor.

The imminence of the boundary review – with its planned reduction of Commons Members from 650 to 600 – means that almost every single Conservative MP will be facing his or her new “selectorate” in a  matter of a few months’ time.   The volume of Tory MPs siding with “LEAVE” is hardly surprising in that light.  Tory activists are increasingly Eurosceptic and the Daily Telegraph rates them currently 75% for “LEAVE”. This makes them even more unrepresentative of Conservative voters, and of the electorate as a whole, than previously.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 5 Comments

Paul Tyler writes: What would Keynes do?

Amidst all the sound and fury (from the Conservative benches), about the delay in implementing boundary changes, agreed by a substantial majority in the Lords last Monday evening, one important argument seems to have got lost.

When Labour left office in May 2010, we were given to understand that the electoral register was some 92% complete.  Parliament decided in the discussions on the Parliamentary Voting Systems and Constituencies Bill that this was a sufficiently robust basis for the redrawing of constituencies along strict arithmetic lines.

Subsequently, research by the Electoral Commission established that it was nothing like as complete.  Nationally, the figure …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 9 Comments

Constituency boundary changes are dead.* Unlike the House of Lords.*

House of Lords. Photo: Parliamentary copyright images are reproduced with the permission of ParliamentThe House of Lords has today voted to block a reduction in the number of MPs from 650 to 600 as part of the review of constituencies that might have seen the Conservatives gain up to 20 seats. The BBC reports:

The House of Lords voted by 300 to 231 to delay until 2018 a boundary review necessary to make the change. … Lib Dem leader and Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg announced that his party

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 26 Comments

Chris Rennard backs move to kill off, not just delay, boundary changes

PoliticsHome reports:

Chris RennardLabour peer Lord Hart has just tabled an amendment to the Electoral Registration Bill which would have another major impact on the timetable of the Coalition’s plans to cut seat numbers.

The amendment, which seeks to amend a clause in Section 10 of the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011, declares that the Boundary Commissions reviews will not take place until….2018. Yes, you read that right, 2018.

Posted in Election law and News | Also tagged and | 12 Comments

The Conservative candidate dilemma

Unsurprisingly, both the Liberal Democrat and Labour parties have decided to go ahead with selecting candidates for the 2015 general election based on the current constituency boundaries.

Where does that leave the Conservatives? In rather a tricky position given David Cameron’s talk of still pressing on hoping to win the boundaries vote.

Posted in News | Also tagged and | 1 Comment

Opinion: What the Tory backbench rebellion means for parliament

Failing to get reform of the House of Lords through the Commons shows a parliamentary asymmetry. There are enough Tory backbenchers to defeat the government, but not enough Liberal Democrat backbenchers to do so. One party’s backbenchers have de facto veto power, but the other’s do not.

There are three responses to this constitutional oddity.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , and | 18 Comments

Changes to your local party boundaries are coming

Next year all Liberal Democrats in England are going to have to get used to new local parties. The coalition government’s plans to change the boundaries of parliamentary constituencies across the UK, assuming they get passed into law, will have implications for how we organise ourselves at a local level.

Traditionally Liberal Democrat local parties have been organised on a constituency basis. The local party would cover one or more parliamentary constituency. More recently a change was made to allow local parties in London to be based on borough boundaries, but for the rest of England local parties remained tied …

Posted in Party policy and internal matters | Also tagged | 18 Comments

Recent Comments

  • User AvatarKim Spence-Jones 27th Oct - 1:39pm
    I really don't share your pessimism. In two years time (if the farce lasts that long) the wealth of anti-Brexit evidence will be huge, and...
  • User AvatarSimon Pike 27th Oct - 1:39pm
    Like several previous commenters, I have never campaigned against a third runway at Heathrow - because I believe that extra runway capacity is needed, and...
  • User Avatarmalc 27th Oct - 1:38pm
    David Raw "Thanks a lot, Malc………… enjoy." Actually I voted for remaining in the EU and enjoy European holiday's, but that doesn't mean I believe...
  • User Avatarpaul barker 27th Oct - 1:37pm
    Superman as scary Clown or, in Boris case just not-very-funny Clown. We can beat them. I am off to Richmond Park.
  • User AvatarRichard Easter 27th Oct - 1:27pm
    So May gave speeches to Goldman Sachs, Clegg gave speeches to Goldman Sachs and Clinton gave speeches to Goldman Sachs... we're all in this together...
  • User AvatarAndrew Toye 27th Oct - 1:26pm
    It should be said that Lynton Crosby is only an advisor for the Conservatives - anyone standing for a position of leadership should take responsibility...