Tag Archives: party organisation

Opinion: Shhh! Keep this secret

Everyone knows that the Federal Party committees do important business and that this business has to be kept absolutely secret. So I can’t really say anything about Monday’s Federal Executive meeting.

But if we are to move to OMOV (one member one vote – essentially the abolition of conference representatives) there need to be reports capable of being seen in the public domain and hopefully – unlike some reports I have seen within the Party about Federal Committees – uncoloured by the standpoint of the observer.

So let’s have a go.

We talked about OMOV itself. There is now a working party including both enthusiasts and sceptics and this has gone through the necessary amendments again and is hoping that this time it’s watertight. There are some very important loose ends, like how to ensure that people can afford to attend conference, and how the members of committees are to be held properly to account. There will be some consultation work on these at the spring conference.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 18 Comments

Federal Committee candidate lists announced

Libby - Some rghts reserved by David SpenderIf you are a party member, you might want to head to this thread on our Members’ Forum to see the lists of people standing for the Party Committees. The ballot will be conducted predominantly online with links to the ballot being provided to those Conference Representatives for whom the party has an email address. Those emails will be being despatched imminently. Ballots will be sent by post to those for whom there is no email address. The postie will be struggling up the path with the weight of the mailing – there are over 100 candidates for the 42 places on the three committees.

Posted in News | Also tagged , , and | 13 Comments

A Liberal Democrat membership revolution

We know that the Liberal Democrats, in common with other parties, have  been looking at declining membership figures for some years now. Tim Farron alluded to this in his conference speech at the weekend.

Three times as many people entered the X Factor this year than joined a political party.

In the Liberal Democrats it has been a tough three years. People have not felt confident about recruiting members because of the wider political environment. Also, many local parties feel that there is no incentive to put time and effort into recruitment when there is little or no reward for them. …

Posted in News and Party policy and internal matters | Also tagged , and | 18 Comments

Three things the Liberal Democrats must learn from Eastleigh

Liberal Democrats are entitled to a weekend of being incredibly pleased with ourselves. I have never been as proud of this party as I am now. The way we calmly and professionally got on with delivering a brilliant campaign on the ground was astonishingly good. Activists put their lives on hold and dedicated themselves to Eastleigh for three weeks. My eternal regret will be that I never made it there, due to a horrendous Flu and its lingering aftermath. However, Team Scotland and many others across the country phonebanked their hearts out. Yesterday in Edinburgh, we even had to have …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 50 Comments

Last chance to stand for important internal elections – deadline 5pm tomorrow, 18th January

Do you have a head for figures and financial management, an interest in international relations, diversity, SAOs or campaigns?

I wrote last week that there were some important internal elections next week. The electorate is very small, the newly elected Federal Executive of which I am a member. However, you don’t have to be a member of that body to stand. Many of the positions up for grabs are open to any member of the Liberal Democrats.

The posts to be elected are listed in full on the members’ only website.They include posts such as five members of the Federal Finance …

Posted in News | Also tagged and | 4 Comments

Opinion: We should elect all Liberal Democrat nominees to the House of Lords

In 2012 House of Lords reform failed. In 2013 it’s time for Liberal Democrats to show their continuing commitment to democratic reform.

We clearly can’t get the law changed at the moment but we can make a clear, unambiguous statement of intent. It’s just simple democracy and it’s easy; the membership should elect the Liberal Democrat candidates for the Lords. One simple motion at the party conference and a bit of commitment from the leadership is all it takes.

Well of course it’s not that simple, so let’s examine a few of the arguments against and the counter arguments:

This is just internal

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 15 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarLittle Jackie Paper 1st Aug - 8:48pm
    Huntbach - 'The “No” campaign most certainly did not use the line “Vote No as AV is an insufficient reform to the electoral system”.' Really?...
  • User AvatarAlistair 1st Aug - 8:30pm
    Steve, my point was that the public would eventually have had the opportunity to review Huhne's suitability for office.
  • User AvatarLittle Jackie Paper 1st Aug - 8:26pm
    A Social Liberal - 'So tell me Jackie, should we support or oppose acts because it is the right thing to do, or because we...
  • User AvatarJohn Bennett 1st Aug - 8:22pm
    The AV was sad. My difficult cousin (used to be a staunch Labour voter, now veers to UKID) opposed AV because he is against Proportional...
  • User AvatarLittle Jackie Paper 1st Aug - 8:18pm
    'Imagine how much we would get done with 25 Caroline Lucas’?' I would be very, very careful with this line of argument. There is nothing...
  • User AvatarAndrew 1st Aug - 8:01pm
    Matthew, Can you sum up your Corbyn-propping-up-the-Tories argument in 3 bullet points? I quite like it, but it is a bit convoluted! (plus Corbyn seems...