Tag Archives: paul johnson

How should we share the gain and the pain in the next Parliament?

resolutionfoundationThat was the question the Resolution Foundation posed at a Lib Dem conference fringe meeting in Glasgow last week. Some of what follows was inspired by (ie, copied from) IFS Director Paul Johnson’s excellent LibDemVoice article, Balancing the books: some unpalatable choices, published last week. Some of it I’ve previously rehearsed in my ConservativeHome column, Make no mistake, these are deep and meaningful cuts – and there’s more to come. Anyway, here’s what I said…

“The gain and the pain.” I want to congratulate the Resolution Foundation on taking a glass half-full approach to the next five years. But I also want to challenge the premise of the question. Because – and I don’t want to be too depressing in what follows – I can see quite a lot of pain and I’m at a bit of a loss to see where the gain is likely to come from. Here’s why.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 7 Comments

A twin-track differentiation policy

Here’s my take on yesterday’s speech by Nick Clegg, along with some further analysis from the IFS’s Paul Johnson and Conservative MP Robert Halpern, all via the World at One:

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 1 Comment

Making work pay – how taxes should work better for the ‘squeezed middle’

The Resolution Foundation helped give birth to the phrase ‘squeezed middle': that group of low-income individuals and families just above the threshold to qualify for most welfare help, but only just able to make ends meet, and always in danger of slipping back into poverty.

Today they’ve published a report written by Paul Johnson, Director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, identifying key reforms that could allow the tax and welfare system to redistribute more efficiently. Here’s the summary-of-the-summary:

Simply making the current system more generous to those on low incomes will not be sustainable in the long run. Reforms to

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 11 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Stallard 31st Aug - 4:04pm
    @Jayne Because then they would have to wait for the decision in that country (which might take a long time). If they are still in...
  • User AvatarAndrewMcC 31st Aug - 3:51pm
    Graham, The Scottish Liberal Democrats would display common sense if they at least became agnostic on Scottish independence. Then some of the Liberal-minded voters who...
  • User AvatarStuart 31st Aug - 3:43pm
    Only a few weeks ago, John Tilley was commenting on LDV about the seriousness of the housing crisis. Now he's suggesting we can absorb large...
  • User AvatarAndrewMcC 31st Aug - 3:40pm
    expats; yes, I notice that many Lib Dem tweeters including Tim Farron have had a go at Corbyn for daring to suggest that extra-judicial murder...
  • User Avatarjedibeeftrix 31st Aug - 3:37pm
    @ AndrewMcC - You make three points, let me answer them: 1. "Morally wrong? Is it morally right to pay bankers 400 times more than...
  • User AvatarGraham Evans 31st Aug - 3:34pm
    @Simon Hebditch Coalition building needs parties willing to co-operate, but it's not obvious to me at the present time why the Greena, Labour or the...