Tag Archives: paul johnson

How should we share the gain and the pain in the next Parliament?

resolutionfoundationThat was the question the Resolution Foundation posed at a Lib Dem conference fringe meeting in Glasgow last week. Some of what follows was inspired by (ie, copied from) IFS Director Paul Johnson’s excellent LibDemVoice article, Balancing the books: some unpalatable choices, published last week. Some of it I’ve previously rehearsed in my ConservativeHome column, Make no mistake, these are deep and meaningful cuts – and there’s more to come. Anyway, here’s what I said…

“The gain and the pain.” I want to congratulate the Resolution Foundation on taking a glass half-full approach to the next five years. But I also want to challenge the premise of the question. Because – and I don’t want to be too depressing in what follows – I can see quite a lot of pain and I’m at a bit of a loss to see where the gain is likely to come from. Here’s why.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 7 Comments

A twin-track differentiation policy

Here’s my take on yesterday’s speech by Nick Clegg, along with some further analysis from the IFS’s Paul Johnson and Conservative MP Robert Halpern, all via the World at One:

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 1 Comment

Making work pay – how taxes should work better for the ‘squeezed middle’

The Resolution Foundation helped give birth to the phrase ‘squeezed middle’: that group of low-income individuals and families just above the threshold to qualify for most welfare help, but only just able to make ends meet, and always in danger of slipping back into poverty.

Today they’ve published a report written by Paul Johnson, Director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, identifying key reforms that could allow the tax and welfare system to redistribute more efficiently. Here’s the summary-of-the-summary:

Simply making the current system more generous to those on low incomes will not be sustainable in the long run. Reforms to

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 11 Comments

Most Read

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael BG 19th Jan - 6:49pm
    @ matt Liberals do believe in freedom of choice and that all adults should be able to vote on who represents them (not voting for...
  • User AvatarDuncan Brack 19th Jan - 6:42pm
    It's perhaps worth pointing out that the next conference will be having a debate on nuclear weapons because autumn conference in 2015 instructed the FPC...
  • User AvatarGeoff Crocker 19th Jan - 6:25pm
    It matters because the pure model of representative democracy would have produced one result, whereas the democratic decision to invoke another model of democracy in...
  • User Avatarmatt 19th Jan - 6:21pm
    @ David Allen “you ludicrously describe as “overwhelming” support for May’s strategy. That’s Brexiteering of course, the brave new post-truth politics” If you look at...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 19th Jan - 6:10pm
    It is very good to be able to strongly agree with Lord Greaves for a change ! That is if he seems to be suggesting...
  • User AvatarDavid Becket 19th Jan - 5:50pm
    No Tim Hill, not last year, as Tony Greaves has indicated, 35 years ago. I hope there enough thinking like Tony on the FPC to...