Tag Archives: paul johnson

How should we share the gain and the pain in the next Parliament?

resolutionfoundationThat was the question the Resolution Foundation posed at a Lib Dem conference fringe meeting in Glasgow last week. Some of what follows was inspired by (ie, copied from) IFS Director Paul Johnson’s excellent LibDemVoice article, Balancing the books: some unpalatable choices, published last week. Some of it I’ve previously rehearsed in my ConservativeHome column, Make no mistake, these are deep and meaningful cuts – and there’s more to come. Anyway, here’s what I said…

“The gain and the pain.” I want to congratulate the Resolution Foundation on taking a glass half-full approach to the next five years. But I also want to challenge the premise of the question. Because – and I don’t want to be too depressing in what follows – I can see quite a lot of pain and I’m at a bit of a loss to see where the gain is likely to come from. Here’s why.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 7 Comments

A twin-track differentiation policy

Here’s my take on yesterday’s speech by Nick Clegg, along with some further analysis from the IFS’s Paul Johnson and Conservative MP Robert Halpern, all via the World at One:

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 1 Comment

Making work pay – how taxes should work better for the ‘squeezed middle’

The Resolution Foundation helped give birth to the phrase ‘squeezed middle': that group of low-income individuals and families just above the threshold to qualify for most welfare help, but only just able to make ends meet, and always in danger of slipping back into poverty.

Today they’ve published a report written by Paul Johnson, Director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, identifying key reforms that could allow the tax and welfare system to redistribute more efficiently. Here’s the summary-of-the-summary:

Simply making the current system more generous to those on low incomes will not be sustainable in the long run. Reforms to

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 11 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarWilliam Hobhouse 26th Apr - 1:59pm
    Thank you Denis Mollison for a couple of links as few posts back, and for the restatement of the Lib Dem position on STV. is...
  • User AvatarPaul Walter 26th Apr - 1:45pm
    g "But on the other hand if a party can command the support of a majority of the Commons and the Lib Dem bloc in...
  • User AvatarTony Greaves 26th Apr - 1:43pm
    A lot of Labour peers do not want a democratic Lords. Tony Greaves
  • User AvatarstatgeekUK 26th Apr - 1:34pm
    I think I speak for many ordinary voters out there when I say that the Lib Dems are failing in polls in Scotland for the...
  • User AvatarMr Wallace 26th Apr - 1:32pm
    @tonyhill. Exactly, if you're a liberal you should be voting for a liberal party that represents your beliefs. It is the job of the Liberal...
  • User AvatarRoland 26th Apr - 1:25pm
    "I’ve been quite clear that I think that the worst possible outcome of this election would be a majority Tory Government" In terms of evolving...