Tag Archives: personal independence payments

Liberal Democrats are the only party standing up against PIP cuts

If you haven’t read Matt’s article about how the changes to Personal Independence Payments will affect him, then please do so.

Last night, the amazing Liberal Democrat peers did their best to try and stop the Government’s plans in their tracks. They filed a fatal motion which, like the one that saw off the fatal changes to tax credits, would have forced the Government to think again.

What they needed was the support of the Labour Party. However, as we know from Brexit, Labour don’t seem to be up for providing any opposition that actually means anything. Did they vote for our motion? No. They did, however, put down their own motion which amounted to little more than “We don’t like this very much but we aren’t going to do anything about it.”

Be in no doubt that if Labour had supported our motion, these PIP cuts would not be happening.

Following the votes,  Baroness Celia Thomas, Lords Spokesperson for Disability, said:

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 14 Comments

Lib Dem Lords aim to kill new Tory restrictions on disability benefits

The Liberal Democrats have tabled a motion to kill Government attempts to severely restrict disability benefits.

The move follows an announcement by the Government that they will be tightening the criteria for claimants of Personal Independence Payments (PIP) which could see diabetics and those with mental illnesses stuck without support. The Government has introduced these restrictions after losing two cases at tribunals.  From the Minister’s statement:

The first judgement held that needing support to take medication and monitor a health condition should be scored in the same way as needing support to manage therapy, like dialysis, undertaken at home. Until this ruling, the assessment made a distinction between these two groups, on the basis that people who need support to manage therapy of this kind are likely to have a higher level of need, and therefore face higher costs.

The second held that someone who cannot make a journey without assistance due to psychological distress should be scored in the same way as a person who needs assistance because they have difficulties navigating. By way of example, the first group might include some people with isolated social phobia or anxiety, whereas the second group might include some people who are blind. Until this ruling, the assessment made a distinction between these two groups, on the basis that people who cannot navigate, due to a visual or cognitive impairment, are likely to have a higher level of need, and therefore face higher costs.

Responding to the announcement Baroness Cathy Bakewell, Liberal Democrat Shadow Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, said:

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 27 Comments

Baroness Thomas writes… Getting Personal Independence Payments right

This afternoon the Department of Work and Pensions announces a significant change on the new Personal Independent Payments following significant Lib Dem pressure. Celia Thomas, the Lib Dem peer who has campaigned tirelessly on the issue, explains why it’s a major win.

Getting the rules governing Personal Independence Payments right is vital. The new benefit, which will begin to replace Disability Living Allowance later this year, will have a huge effect on disabled people up and down the country.

I’m broadly in favour of the change to PIP, which seeks to clarify the eligibility of disabled people to this benefit, the purpose …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 15 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarHugh p 29th Mar - 4:05pm
    Was Theresa May aware of the symbolism of the photo showing her, when signing the letter delivered today, sitting beneath No.10's portrait of Sir Robert...
  • User AvatarHywel 29th Mar - 3:30pm
    I'm not sure it would class as the most "remarkable by-election victory ever known". Though was Nick a party member for Eastbourne or Ribble Valley....
  • User AvatarStimpson 29th Mar - 3:18pm
    I am proud to stand with migrants, multinational corporations, the elites, Juncker, the EU Commission, and everything else the far right and far left blame...
  • User AvatarKeith Browning 29th Mar - 3:11pm
    I sent my letter to Michel Barnier, via the EU website set up to keep everyone in touch Dear Michel Barnier The letter you received...
  • User AvatarStimpson 29th Mar - 3:07pm
    A disaster for us all. Utterly ashamed of the British public, the Tories, Labour and UKIP right now standing up for immoral protectionism. Proud to...
  • User AvatarStimpson 29th Mar - 3:02pm
    And so Britain goes from a global liberal corporate country into a nationalist protectionist disaster motivated by a motkey coalition of Empire Loyalists, flag waving...