Tag Archives: proselytism

Daily View 2×2: 4 March 2010

Good morning and welcome to Thursday’s Daily View.

There’s a huge chunk of exciting things that happened today in history, so it’s an auspicious day to welcome a baby Cullen. Our technical editor Ryan has been tweeting progress, and as I write this there’s a lot of pushing going on. Best wishes from all at LDV to the Cullen family – I’m sure LDV Towers will soon get used to night feeds. I’m dusting off my copy of Gina Ford as I type.

Male swans from Matthew Bourne's Swan LakeSo, today in history: the US Congress met for the first time in 1789. In 1790, France was divvied into départements. In 1797, John Adams succeeded George Washington, the first ever peaceful transfer of power between elected leaders in modern times. Chicago was founded in 1837; Tchaikovsky’s Swan Lake premiered in Moscow in 1877 and in 1882, East London saw Britain’s first electric trams. The first Daimler car was unveiled and in 1933, the first woman joined the US Cabinet.

March 4th birthdays include Vivaldi, in 1678, Sir Patrick Moore, and Nottingham novellist Alan Sillitoe (I was at the meeting of Nottingham City Council that made him an honorary freeman of the city, incidentally)

2 Big Stories

Evil Gays update

Civil partnerships – gay marriages – could soon be registered in places of worship – something currently expressly banned by statute, which is particularly unfair on those faiths which don’t have a problem with gay relationships, including Quakers and Reform Judaism. The Times has one version of the information; the Telegraph on the other hand manages to paint a far more bleak version of the havoc that could be wrought by litigious homos.

Meanwhile, David Cameron has averred that his party’s tax breaks, maternity and paternity rights planned for married couples will also be available to their civilly partnershipped brethren. Not quite sure how this tallies with last month’s pronouncement that would be no new gay rights under the Tories.

Posted in Daily View | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and | 2 Comments

Daily View 2×2: 24 December 2009

Good morning, and thank you for trudging through the snow and ice to Daily View. It’s Christmas Eve, and the staff at LDV Towers are expecting a half-day holiday if they get through all their work.

Across Europe, it’s today (rather than tomorrow) that many continental children receive their visit from Santa. Is that enough date-related trivia? Hell no! Carol Vorderman, Caroline Aherne and Barry Chuckle were all Christmas babies and are celebrating birthdays today.

Literary giants Harold Pinter and William Makepeace Thackery both died on Christmas eve, albeit 145 years apart.

And in events on Christmas eve: in 1946, the French Fourth Republic was founded; and in 1968 the crew of Apollo 8 were the first humans to escape the Earth’s gravity, and the first to broadcast the bible from space.

An eventful day! But click on to find what’s happening today.

Posted in Daily View | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and | 1 Comment



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMalcolm Todd 24th Oct - 11:15am
    Indeed, it's good of you to provide such fertile ground for diverting play for those of us whose a**e-pokers are not too rigid. More power...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 24th Oct - 11:14am
    If Paul Tyler and other Liberal Democrats in the Lords were mounting a consistent and ongoing campaign to get rid of the everyday farce I...
  • User Avatariain 24th Oct - 11:12am
    Gordon is a probable loss anyway, and if he stands it may actually help us in the long run, as it will encourage Labour and...
  • User AvatarSimon McGrath 24th Oct - 11:11am
    William - because a) renwables are (at least at the moment) much more expensive than gas b) virtually all our domestic heating runs on gas
  • User AvatarSimon McGrath 24th Oct - 11:09am
    " the underlying message “politicians are all bad, don’t get involved” is the same one as the Orange Bookers" Can you point to any evidence...
  • User Avatarjedibeeftrix 24th Oct - 11:04am
    It's a fine spoof. No problems from in that regard. I use pseudonym, and a deliberately silly one at that, so I could not complain...