Tag Archives: protection of freedoms bill

Julian Huppert MP writes… Have your say – Coalition plans to regulate CCTV

The Home Office yesterday announced plans for the regulation of CCTV as part of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012.

This is fantastic news. The regulation of CCTV and the protection of civil liberties were key to our manifesto and prominent in the coalition agreement.

Britain is home to as many as 4.2 million CCTV cameras – up to 20% of cameras globally – yet under Labour there was virtually no control over who has access to state surveillance. Our reforms mean we can control who has access to cameras, and how the footage is used.

Regulation will be crucial …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 7 Comments

Two weeks, two major achievements for the Liberal Democrats in government

Last week the Green Investment Bank made its first loans, as Nick Clegg mentioned yesterday, and this week the Protection of Freedoms Bill received Royal Assent and became an Act, as Tom Brake wrote about on this site.

The Protection of Freedoms Act includes the banning of rogue private wheel clampers, who are so unpopular that when Lynne Featherstone announced the plans last year it resulted in wall-to-wall positive coverage from the broadcast media, the tabloid press, the broadsheet press and even the pollsters. When the media and 87% of the public love a policy of ours …

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 6 Comments

Coming up in the Lords… 6-16 February

Whilst the Commons continues to doze, the Lords continues to put in a long shift at the legislative coalface. This week, the highlights are as follows;

Day 2 of the Report Stage of the Protection of Freedoms Bill takes place on 6 February, with rumours of a Conservative-led rebellion on the vexed question of the vast array of people and organisations that have access to your home. We hope to have an article on the subject nearer the time, so watch this space.

On 7 and 9 February, the …

Posted in News and Parliament | Also tagged , , and | 1 Comment

Opinion: Free our children to play tipcat

Laws are infringements of an individual’s liberty. Where they exist, they must be justified (and plenty of laws are perfectly justifiable), but those that cannot be justified should be ditched.

We have seen some of this work being done by the Coalition – through the Protection of Freedoms Bill and Vince Cable’s Red Tape Challenge (which is set to repeal the wartime Trading with the Enemy Act) – but there is a hidden layer of rules and regulations, much of it petty, obsolete or needless: council bye-laws.

Let me justify each of those criticisms with examples from the bye-laws currently in …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , and | 18 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 26th Nov - 10:56am
    @Tsar Nicolas "This talk of getting 28 seats when the current polls show the party on around 7% – OK, I’ll be generous and say...
  • User AvatarJohn Stevens 26th Nov - 10:54am
    Et tu Brute?
  • User AvatarD McKay 26th Nov - 10:48am
    Thanks Roland. I suppose my question would be (and I don't expect anyone to know the answer!) how many of those in the 60,000 would...
  • User AvatarStephen Hesketh 26th Nov - 10:42am
    Sorry ... Charles ... yet another 'Kingdom for a preview/amend button' request!
  • User AvatarStephen Hesketh 26th Nov - 10:40am
    Charles Rothwell26th Nov '14 - 7:27am "I pray the mathematics will not allow us back into government in the form of a coalition. The wave...
  • User Avatariain 26th Nov - 10:38am
    ' I seem to remember from recent discussions the figure of 60,000 on JSA in 2013 was cited, but putting this into context this represented...