Tag Archives: protection of freedoms bill

Julian Huppert MP writes… Have your say – Coalition plans to regulate CCTV

The Home Office yesterday announced plans for the regulation of CCTV as part of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012.

This is fantastic news. The regulation of CCTV and the protection of civil liberties were key to our manifesto and prominent in the coalition agreement.

Britain is home to as many as 4.2 million CCTV cameras – up to 20% of cameras globally – yet under Labour there was virtually no control over who has access to state surveillance. Our reforms mean we can control who has access to cameras, and how the footage is used.

Regulation will be crucial …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 7 Comments

Two weeks, two major achievements for the Liberal Democrats in government

Last week the Green Investment Bank made its first loans, as Nick Clegg mentioned yesterday, and this week the Protection of Freedoms Bill received Royal Assent and became an Act, as Tom Brake wrote about on this site.

The Protection of Freedoms Act includes the banning of rogue private wheel clampers, who are so unpopular that when Lynne Featherstone announced the plans last year it resulted in wall-to-wall positive coverage from the broadcast media, the tabloid press, the broadsheet press and even the pollsters. When the media and 87% of the public love a policy of ours …

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 6 Comments

Coming up in the Lords… 6-16 February

Whilst the Commons continues to doze, the Lords continues to put in a long shift at the legislative coalface. This week, the highlights are as follows;

Day 2 of the Report Stage of the Protection of Freedoms Bill takes place on 6 February, with rumours of a Conservative-led rebellion on the vexed question of the vast array of people and organisations that have access to your home. We hope to have an article on the subject nearer the time, so watch this space.

On 7 and 9 February, the …

Posted in News and Parliament | Also tagged , , and | 1 Comment

Opinion: Free our children to play tipcat

Laws are infringements of an individual’s liberty. Where they exist, they must be justified (and plenty of laws are perfectly justifiable), but those that cannot be justified should be ditched.

We have seen some of this work being done by the Coalition – through the Protection of Freedoms Bill and Vince Cable’s Red Tape Challenge (which is set to repeal the wartime Trading with the Enemy Act) – but there is a hidden layer of rules and regulations, much of it petty, obsolete or needless: council bye-laws.

Let me justify each of those criticisms with examples from the bye-laws currently in …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , and | 18 Comments

Recent Comments

  • User AvatarManfarang 27th Oct - 4:19am
    Hitler with the 1936 Olympics made the Olympics the great show it is today. In later years the East Germans were great Olympic medal winners....
  • User AvatarConor McGovern 27th Oct - 3:51am
    Eddie Sammon's completely right - when Parliament want to subvert the aims of the majority in a referendum, does it really hold the democratic high...
  • User AvatarGlenn 27th Oct - 3:39am
    People over complicate the freedom of movement argument. Freedom of movement is not the same thing as the right to reside permanently in the UK...
  • User AvatarTonyJ 27th Oct - 2:58am
    The fact that Labour have no clear position on this issue is extraordinary. I listened to their Transport spokesman in parliament the other day, and...
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 27th Oct - 1:32am
    Stevan, I was aghast because you wrote 'Genuine refugees in fear for their lives can and should claim asylum in France but they don't so...
  • User AvatarMark Goodrich 27th Oct - 1:24am
    @Ethics gradient - I would just like to commend you for being open-minded and listening to reasoned argument. More of that please! There was a...