Tag Archives: protection of freedoms bill

Julian Huppert MP writes… Have your say – Coalition plans to regulate CCTV

The Home Office yesterday announced plans for the regulation of CCTV as part of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012.

This is fantastic news. The regulation of CCTV and the protection of civil liberties were key to our manifesto and prominent in the coalition agreement.

Britain is home to as many as 4.2 million CCTV cameras – up to 20% of cameras globally – yet under Labour there was virtually no control over who has access to state surveillance. Our reforms mean we can control who has access to cameras, and how the footage is used.

Regulation will be crucial …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 7 Comments

Two weeks, two major achievements for the Liberal Democrats in government

Last week the Green Investment Bank made its first loans, as Nick Clegg mentioned yesterday, and this week the Protection of Freedoms Bill received Royal Assent and became an Act, as Tom Brake wrote about on this site.

The Protection of Freedoms Act includes the banning of rogue private wheel clampers, who are so unpopular that when Lynne Featherstone announced the plans last year it resulted in wall-to-wall positive coverage from the broadcast media, the tabloid press, the broadsheet press and even the pollsters. When the media and 87% of the public love a policy of ours …

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 6 Comments

Coming up in the Lords… 6-16 February

Whilst the Commons continues to doze, the Lords continues to put in a long shift at the legislative coalface. This week, the highlights are as follows;

Day 2 of the Report Stage of the Protection of Freedoms Bill takes place on 6 February, with rumours of a Conservative-led rebellion on the vexed question of the vast array of people and organisations that have access to your home. We hope to have an article on the subject nearer the time, so watch this space.

On 7 and 9 February, the …

Posted in News and Parliament | Also tagged , , and | 1 Comment

Opinion: Free our children to play tipcat

Laws are infringements of an individual’s liberty. Where they exist, they must be justified (and plenty of laws are perfectly justifiable), but those that cannot be justified should be ditched.

We have seen some of this work being done by the Coalition – through the Protection of Freedoms Bill and Vince Cable’s Red Tape Challenge (which is set to repeal the wartime Trading with the Enemy Act) – but there is a hidden layer of rules and regulations, much of it petty, obsolete or needless: council bye-laws.

Let me justify each of those criticisms with examples from the bye-laws currently in …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , and | 18 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJoe Bourke 4th Sep - 2:02am
    Mick Taylor, I think that is a very good suggestion. A call for volunteers to house Syrian refugees until they can stand on their own...
  • User AvatarCarl Gardner 4th Sep - 1:18am
    @Andrew McC, Of course "killing someone illegally" (in other words, murder) is worse than any morally deficient statement. But you're question's wrong-headed in more ways...
  • User AvatarCarl Gardner 4th Sep - 1:00am
    @Simon Thorley, it’s clear that you favour a form of benign dictatorship, alternating between two feudal houses ... as the best form of government we...
  • User AvatarBim 4th Sep - 12:57am
    parents wanting a few days with their children when they can both afford it Since when did it cost money to spend time with your...
  • User AvatarBim 4th Sep - 12:52am
    Why did Oxford and Cambridge organise their terms that way? Well, because those are the old legal terms — the dates when courts sat, established...
  • User Avatarkevin 4th Sep - 12:52am
    More absurdity,another band wagon more opportunism