Tag Archives: public accounts committee

Opinion: Get real about corporate tax

Companies currently pay corporation tax in the country where they are incorporated. A campaign is under way, in the Guardian, and the Commons Public Accounts Committee, that companies should instead pay tax where they make their sales. The proposal has populist appeal, but is impracticable.

Many companies, including UK companies, make export sales without costly incorporation in each sales country. If a US coal producer sells 1m tonnes of coal to UK powerplants for £100m, and makes £5m profit, it submits accounts in the US for tax authority scrutiny, and pays US tax on the £5m. Should this profit be …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , , and | 29 Comments

Opinion: Should we be selling state assets to reduce debt and create jobs?

One of the unexpected by-products of the controversial privatisations of the 1980s was the discovery of shockingly poor real estate management by state bodies – a rare glimpse of a problem only brought to the surface when the need for proper balance sheets arose.

UK government departments and agencies have since been shown to exhibit appalling asset management, as any sweep through Public Accounts Committee (PAC) or National Audit Office (NAO) reports will demonstrate – stories of unused land & buildings, ‘forgotten’ landholdings, leases on punitive terms, opaque sale of land at below market prices. Government departments also own very large …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 6 Comments

LibLink… Paddy Ashdown: Defence cuts? Why, they’ve barely started

In today’s Times (£) Paddy Ashdown argues that the Ministry of Defence is “no longer fit for purpose.”

Ashdown says that the current government are not making enough progress with addressing the Ministry’s problems: the large annual deficit, bureaucratic blunders and project overruns and puts them down to a lack of political direction.

Here’s an excerpt:

The dust is now settling on the Strategic Defence and Security Review, published last October. And what it reveals is that the deeply painful cuts already announced are not going to be enough to balance the books. There will have to be more — there may

Posted in LibLink | Also tagged , and | 6 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAdrian PR 29th Jan - 12:09am
    paul barker writes: > Right now more than a third of voters say they want Parties other than The Big Two, > I dont see...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 28th Jan - 11:43pm
    Glenn Matthew, the arguments about what could have happened had the coalition not been formed in 2010 are little pointless. My view is that the...
  • User AvatarStevo 28th Jan - 11:33pm
    ATF- your last comment got garbled. Carney said that deficits should be able to rise in downturns (like any good Keynesian would tell you), what...
  • User AvatarAdrian PR 28th Jan - 11:29pm
    Roland writes: > It would seem that the 65 candidates being totally party appointee’s have no real democratic mandate They are elected from a party...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 28th Jan - 11:07pm
    Alex Sabine In the privacy of the polling booths, voters evidently decided that the substantial tax hikes proposed by Labour risked prolonging the recession and...
  • User AvatarStephen Donnelly 28th Jan - 11:00pm
    Tony Greaves : "Anyway you cannot be right wing on economics an left wing on welfare. The two are closely linked." What a gross simplification...