Tag Archives: snoopers charter

The scariest thing you have never heard of

On 30th December 2016 the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (more commonly known as the Snoopers’ Charter) came into force; suffocating personal privacy and liberty without so much as a whimper from Labour or the SNP.

Under the guise of counter-terrorism, the government has achieved unprecedented surveillance powers over its own citizens and now has the ability to indiscriminately monitor, record, hack and spy on the communications and internet use of everyone in the country.

With the official opposition in disarray and unable (and even in many cases unwilling) to scrutinise the government’s actions and challenge the narrative that state security automatically overrides and supersedes the protection of civil liberties without a second thought, the result has been the slow but steady growth of the state’s industrial-scale espionage on its own citizens and the erosion of the liberty safe-guards put in place by the Liberal Democrats while in government.

While much ink has been spilt on the consequences of this Act – most notably in the LDV articles written by Elliott Motson, Alistair Carmichael and Tim Farron – many consequences have only been seen in isolation. Ironically, legislation designed for a modern digital age becomes the more dangerous when coupled with one of the earliest – A Bill of Attainder.

Posted in News | Also tagged | 8 Comments

LibLink: Julian Huppert “The UK’s Investigatory Powers Bill is about to become law – here’s why that should terrify us”

Julian Huppert MPJulian Huppert has written a powerful piece on Open Democracy.  He writes:

The Investigatory Powers Bill is sneaking up on the final steps before it becomes law – something that should terrify all of us.

Some of the powers in the Bill are deeply intrusive, and with very little possible justification. All of us want to be safe, and protected from terrorists and the like – but the evidence that these powers are all needed is thin indeed. However, the cost to all of our privacy is huge.

For example, a power the state never had before is to require a log to be kept for a year of every website we ever go to. Just think of that – your browsing history stored, just in case it’s ever useful. If you ever choose to visit a depression support website, would you want that to now be logged, potentially revealing your mental health state? What about an abortion advice site? Marriage guidance? Why does the state need to know this about every one of us?

Posted in LibLink | Also tagged and | 10 Comments

Lib Dems should be criticising SNP as well as Labour over failure to oppose Snoopers’ Charter

The Party has produced a couple of graphic quite rightly having a go at Labour over their abstention on the IP Bill.

Labour right to privacy

and

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 11 Comments

The Snoopers’ Charter: A government invasion?

During coalition we blocked the Snoopers Charter. The bill, resurrected under the name of the Investigatory Powers Bill, shows the intent of the Tory Government – to degrade all forms of privacy we once held dear.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 5 Comments

Draft Investigatory Powers Bill – the key points and link to the full text

The Guardian has helpfully just published this handy guide to the draft Investigatory Powers Bill, just announced in parliament by Teresa May:

  • Requires web and phone companies to store records of websites visited by every citizen for 12 months for access by police, security services and other public bodies.
Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 13 Comments

Details of draft investigatory powers bill emerge

The Guardian reports:

Theresa May is to propose a major extension of the surveillance state when she publishes legislation requiring internet companies to store details of every website visited by customers over the previous year.

Posted in News | Also tagged and | Leave a comment

Theresa May does a Paul Daniels on internet surveillance – but the devil is in the detail

Theresa May has pulled off quite a trick in the last couple of weeks. She built up the impression that the government would store the entire nation’s internet browsing history (which must have had computer storage salespeople salivating heavily) and ban encryption (effectively banning WhatsApp and Snapchat).

But now she’s spun the upturned eggcups around the table and revealed that she won’t be doing that after all, so isn’t she soooo reasonable?

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 29 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDave Orbison 30th May - 1:59pm
    Actually, Labour's manifesto is to "Review the Prevent programme with a view to assessing both its effectiveness and its potential to alienate minority communities." It...
  • User AvatarPalehorse 30th May - 1:52pm
    Paul, "....... Liberalism based upon Lloyd George, Keynes and Beveridge. I will happily promote the latter and indeed have during my 34 years as a...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 30th May - 1:28pm
    @ John, "Overall, we should focus on cutting trade deficit if we want to reduce debt in the long run." Yes. That's right. Trade deficits...
  • User Avatarpaul barker 30th May - 1:15pm
    What we need is a policy thats simple enough for an 8 Year Old to get with very little explanation. Thats how Labour have confounded...
  • User AvatarBill le Breton 30th May - 1:06pm
    What is strange here is that Alex wishes to bind Cable to Clegg. This in fact mirrors what happened in 2010 before the Manchester (or...
  • User Avatarpaul holmes 30th May - 12:48pm
    @David Evershed. Depends whether the 'Liberal' economic policies you want to promote are those of nineteenth century Gladstone or those of twentieth century Liberalism based...