Tag Archives: snoopers charter

LibLink: Julian Huppert “The UK’s Investigatory Powers Bill is about to become law – here’s why that should terrify us”

Julian Huppert MPJulian Huppert has written a powerful piece on Open Democracy.  He writes:

The Investigatory Powers Bill is sneaking up on the final steps before it becomes law – something that should terrify all of us.

Some of the powers in the Bill are deeply intrusive, and with very little possible justification. All of us want to be safe, and protected from terrorists and the like – but the evidence that these powers are all needed is thin indeed. However, the cost to all of our privacy is huge.

For example, a power the state never had before is to require a log to be kept for a year of every website we ever go to. Just think of that – your browsing history stored, just in case it’s ever useful. If you ever choose to visit a depression support website, would you want that to now be logged, potentially revealing your mental health state? What about an abortion advice site? Marriage guidance? Why does the state need to know this about every one of us?

Posted in LibLink | Also tagged and | 10 Comments

Lib Dems should be criticising SNP as well as Labour over failure to oppose Snoopers’ Charter

The Party has produced a couple of graphic quite rightly having a go at Labour over their abstention on the IP Bill.

Labour right to privacy


Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 11 Comments

The Snoopers’ Charter: A government invasion?

During coalition we blocked the Snoopers Charter. The bill, resurrected under the name of the Investigatory Powers Bill, shows the intent of the Tory Government – to degrade all forms of privacy we once held dear.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 5 Comments

Draft Investigatory Powers Bill – the key points and link to the full text

The Guardian has helpfully just published this handy guide to the draft Investigatory Powers Bill, just announced in parliament by Teresa May:

  • Requires web and phone companies to store records of websites visited by every citizen for 12 months for access by police, security services and other public bodies.
Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 13 Comments

Details of draft investigatory powers bill emerge

The Guardian reports:

Theresa May is to propose a major extension of the surveillance state when she publishes legislation requiring internet companies to store details of every website visited by customers over the previous year.

Posted in News | Also tagged and | Leave a comment

Theresa May does a Paul Daniels on internet surveillance – but the devil is in the detail

Theresa May has pulled off quite a trick in the last couple of weeks. She built up the impression that the government would store the entire nation’s internet browsing history (which must have had computer storage salespeople salivating heavily) and ban encryption (effectively banning WhatsApp and Snapchat).

But now she’s spun the upturned eggcups around the table and revealed that she won’t be doing that after all, so isn’t she soooo reasonable?

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 29 Comments

Farron: Lib Dems will resist Snoopers’ Charter

GCHQ Bude by Paul WalterIt looks like the Tories’ Snoopers’ Charter to be unveiled this week will be the blinged-up version, with even more sweeping powers than they tried to introduce before. Tim Farron told the Independent that the Liberal Democrats would oppose it just like we did in Government:

Tim Farron, the Liberal Democrat leader, signalled that he would be prepared to muster his 112-strong bloc of peers to oppose measures which undermined individual liberty. “We would use all parliamentary tools available to us to ensure any proposed legislation is properly scrutinised,” he told The Independent.

“Liberal Democrats will always support proportionate measures to increase our security, but we must not allow cornerstone civil liberties to be swept away. We will wait with interest to see the detail of the draft Bill, as the Tories have long argued for powers that are not targeted and not proportionate. We blocked the ‘snooper’s charter’ in government and would strongly resist any attempt to bring it back.

“It would be a dramatic shift in the relationship between the state and the individual and fundamentally strikes the wrong balance between liberty and security.”

Back in 2012, Nick Clegg almost agreed to this but after interventions, one by angry bloggers who understood the technicalities in a Conference call with a special adviser, he pulled back. Instead, a draft bill was tabled and subjected to scrutiny by a committee made-up of representatives from both Houses of Parliament, including our Julian Huppert. They rejected the plan and you can read their report here. They determined:

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 4 Comments

Recent Comments

  • User Avatartheakes 23rd Oct - 2:39pm
    The media just have not tuned into the fact that the Greens and UKIp are declining badly. Andrew Neil and Andrew Marr are typical appear...
  • User AvatarPeter 23rd Oct - 1:57pm
    What an interesting debate and I favour Annabel's arguments overall. One thing not adequately covered is why so many jobs are likely to be lost...
  • User Avatarpaul barker 23rd Oct - 1:38pm
    We should not expect that Polls will reflect the change yet. For one thing, Byelections are out of fashion, they now get very little coverage....
  • User Avatarjedibeeftrix 23rd Oct - 1:33pm
    @ Joe - "Whether it is TPP in the US, TTIP here, Brexit and now this. Agreements aren’t being reached because of political opposition to...
  • User AvatarEl Sid 23rd Oct - 1:29pm
    @"Paul Walter 23rd Oct '16 - 9:36am But El Sid what good are vague and misplaced notions of “sovereignity” (what’s happened to the sovereignity of...
  • User AvatarStevan Rose 23rd Oct - 12:53pm
    "One moment the EU is a ‘dictatorial super-state’ that brooks no dissent and the next it’s an ‘incompetent collection of countries’ who can’t agree on...