Tag Archives: spring conference 2013

The state of the party as we head to Brighton for Spring Conference

By the time you read this, I’ll be in London, no doubt bleary eyed after a night on the sleeper, on my way to Spring Conference in Brighton. I’ve been thinking about how we are as we gather at the seaside. It’s been an eventful six months but has the good outweighed the bad?

Things to smile about

Since we met in Brighton, our ministers in the Coalition Government have done some excellent things. Here’s just a selection:

  • Plans for shared parental leave announced;
  • Equal (ish) marriage Bill unveiled;
  • Stopping the Tories capping Child Benefit at 2 children and taking Housing Benefit off

Posted in Conference and Op-eds | Also tagged | 3 Comments

That ‘jewelry tax’ proposal

Jewellery shot for RK Jewellers 01“Now they want to tax jewellery: New Lib Dem wealth plan to target ALL assets” screamed a headline in the Mail on Sunday yesterday, warning their readers of the latest appalling imposition that Lib Dems in government were about to put upon the public.

“Families will be forced to pay tax on jewellery and other heirlooms under controversial new plans drawn up by the Liberal Democrats. Under the scheme, tax inspectors would get unprecedented new powers to go into homes and value rings, necklaces, paintings, furniture and other family treasures.” they said. If you really want to, read the full article here.

Posted in News | Also tagged and | 21 Comments

Caron’s pick of the Federal Spring Conference agenda

Spring 2013 Federal Conference agendaIt’s just over three weeks until Liberal Democrats gather in Brighton for our annual Federal Spring Conference. This morning the agenda landed on my doorstep and I thought I’d share my highlights with you.

If you can, it’s worth trying to get there for 3 pm on Friday 8th March for the consultation sessions. This is an important part of the policy making process, where ordinary party members can have their say as policy documents are being written. Most of them are on issues which apply to the …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 3 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohnTilley 26th Jan - 2:16pm
    To answer my own question -- this Home Office Report indicates that in the previous year only 23 people we convicted, not all of them...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 26th Jan - 2:07pm
    malc 26th Jan '15 - 11:10am malc, you make a number of valid points. In my comment I tried to make some comparison between what...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 26th Jan - 1:48pm
    Mile Biden ".,, I am quite sure this is not on the radar – that is why I wrote it! " Do you know what...
  • User AvatarSimon Oliver 26th Jan - 1:44pm
    yes, 150 years of study and an unprecedented 97% scientific consensus is a high degree of uncertainty for some.
  • User AvatarSIMON BANKS 26th Jan - 1:20pm
    I hesitate to criticise John Knox, for fear of being consigned to hellfire, but Burns' version scans better.
  • User AvatarGwyn Williams 26th Jan - 1:07pm
    Alex is a formidable debater and advocate. He never slavishly adopts the Party position. His opinion is listened to because he uses his talents to...