Tag Archives: us congress

Daily View 2×2: 4 March 2010

Good morning and welcome to Thursday’s Daily View.

There’s a huge chunk of exciting things that happened today in history, so it’s an auspicious day to welcome a baby Cullen. Our technical editor Ryan has been tweeting progress, and as I write this there’s a lot of pushing going on. Best wishes from all at LDV to the Cullen family – I’m sure LDV Towers will soon get used to night feeds. I’m dusting off my copy of Gina Ford as I type.

Male swans from Matthew Bourne's Swan LakeSo, today in history: the US Congress met for the first time in 1789. In 1790, France was divvied into départements. In 1797, John Adams succeeded George Washington, the first ever peaceful transfer of power between elected leaders in modern times. Chicago was founded in 1837; Tchaikovsky’s Swan Lake premiered in Moscow in 1877 and in 1882, East London saw Britain’s first electric trams. The first Daimler car was unveiled and in 1933, the first woman joined the US Cabinet.

March 4th birthdays include Vivaldi, in 1678, Sir Patrick Moore, and Nottingham novellist Alan Sillitoe (I was at the meeting of Nottingham City Council that made him an honorary freeman of the city, incidentally)

2 Big Stories

Evil Gays update

Civil partnerships – gay marriages – could soon be registered in places of worship – something currently expressly banned by statute, which is particularly unfair on those faiths which don’t have a problem with gay relationships, including Quakers and Reform Judaism. The Times has one version of the information; the Telegraph on the other hand manages to paint a far more bleak version of the havoc that could be wrought by litigious homos.

Meanwhile, David Cameron has averred that his party’s tax breaks, maternity and paternity rights planned for married couples will also be available to their civilly partnershipped brethren. Not quite sure how this tallies with last month’s pronouncement that would be no new gay rights under the Tories.

Posted in Daily View | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and | 2 Comments



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohn Roffey 2nd Oct - 11:13am
    Yes - Matt, that would be the ideal - however the temptation to make more bizarre suggestions springs from the fact that there seems little...
  • User AvatarJoe Otten 2nd Oct - 11:00am
    Two years ago, I would have understood this article. Today, with the economy growing - more strongly than other major economies, unemployment plummeting, and the...
  • User Avatarmatt 2nd Oct - 10:51am
    It is to late to sack Nick now that will just be seen as pure desperation in the electorates eyes. You can't hide Nick away...
  • User AvatarJennie 2nd Oct - 10:50am
    Frank Booth: in terms of preference perhaps people are judging not solely on how much they agree with a particular person but how competent they...
  • User AvatarJulian Tisi 2nd Oct - 10:50am
    "But how many Tories would now prefer a coalition with UKIP? Most, by a large majority, I believe" Actualy the BBC asked that very question...
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 2nd Oct - 10:48am
    Indeed. Something inside of me dies every time I hear Nick talking about how the Coalition has introduced the family income thing for foreign spouses.