Telegraph smears Clegg. Again. (Y’know, I’ve a sneaky feeling they don’t like him.)

Here’s today’s comically skewed headline from the Torygraph:

Nick Clegg wants to let MPs keep family fortunes under wraps

Though you wouldn’t guess it from the headline or the story, what Nick Clegg was actually saying was simple enough: he thinks MPs as public servants should have to be transparent about their financial affairs, but he doesn’t think their family members, as private citizens, should have to publish details of their salaries and any other wealth. Which seems fair enough to me.

But then the Telegraph has a proven track record when it comes to having a pop at the Lib Dem leader. Indeed today’s paper refers to Nick having ‘faced financial scrutiny during the last general election in 2010’… without mentioning that it was the Telegraph’s own smear story that was proven to be false. And then there was this story, with its shabbily inaccurate insinuations that Nick somehow couldn’t cope with the stresses and strains of being Deputy Prime Minister.

In its defence, the Telegraph doesn’t always target Nick Clegg — sometimes it has to apologise to oher Lib Dems for telling porkies as well.

Still, playing the man not the ball is always more fun, and very much in the tradition of British journalism.

* Stephen Tall is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice, and editor of the 2013 publication, The Coalition and Beyond: Liberal Reforms for the Decade Ahead. He is also a Research Associate for the liberal think-tank CentreForum and writes at his own site, The Collected Stephen Tall.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/28042 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

7 Comments

  • Indeed the torygraph doesn’t seem to like hom much. Initially i agreed with Nick however on reflection I do feel that this could potentially be an exploitable loophole whereby an individuals wealth /property can be placed in a partners name and thus avoid scrutiny.

  • So the Telegraph doesnt like Clegg? You surprise me!

    I dont think they are particularly fond of Cameron or Osborne either so at least its not personal: its a general dislike of this coalition government that it not right wing enough for them

  • What? The Telegraph having biased, inaccurate, misrepresented, and/or just plain wrong stories, trying to smear Nick Clegg. I’m shocked. Shocked, I tell you!

  • Will Barter 12th Apr '12 - 6:08pm

    This whole field is a massive opportunity for the party:

    Why don’t the lib dem cabinet members just go ahead and publish their tax returns. What is stopping them? This information is going to come out anyway, so let’s get ours out first – this way we control the timing, and set the agenda. And are seen to set the agenda. There may be a few initial stories about how much certain ministers make, but the attention would then surely shift to the Tories and Labour – and people will start to ask why they haven’t released their returns? If the Tories release their information, then people will see any tax avoidance there. And if they don’t, then it fits the general picture that they have something to hide. So what’s stopping our ministers? Misplaced loyalty to their Tory colleagues? We saw how much such loyalty counts for in the AV referendum last year. This is a place where the Tories are weak, and this is an ideal place to hit them.

  • No surprise that the Torygraph behaves like the Torygraph. Sadly no surprise that Nick Clegg has to be the one who provides the opportunity!

  • John Carlisle 13th Apr '12 - 8:41am

    I think the Telegraph dislikes the Tories intensely; especially Cameron and boy George. I think they are giving us, including Nick, a fair crack of the whip now. Time to test your assumptions?

  • Paul McKeown 13th Apr '12 - 2:43pm

    It isn’t just The Telegraph smearing Nick Clegg, it’s also some Lib Dems, vid. http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-are-we-waiting-2-28043.html

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 24th Nov - 2:57pm
    Stevan Rose But you want to tax the Grandmother that saved and invested more than the Grandmother that blew all her money on extravagant Warners...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 24th Nov - 2:45pm
    nvelope2003 The reality is that the majority who are not poor want to hang on to their money and their relatively comfortable life style and...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 24th Nov - 2:34pm
    Tony Greaves Well I’ve just read the Observer from front to end (missing out the fashion pages) and I did not see this article. It...
  • User AvatarRoland 24th Nov - 1:59pm
    Psi - The reason why you start proceedings against the individual, is that you effectively force them to resolve which capacity they were working in...
  • User AvatarPaul Walter 24th Nov - 1:35pm
    Matt (Bristol) Many thanks for that succinct summary with which I heartily agree!
  • User Avatarmatt (Bristol) 24th Nov - 1:35pm
    Hmm. I respect Danny Alexander, but this confirms my strong desire that he do not lead the party in the near future. If he is...