That leaked campaign document which isn’t really a leaked campaign document

Over on The Spectator there’s a curious leaked document today, ostensibly a leaked internal party document setting out Liberal Democrat campaign weaknesses.

I say ostensibly because the document is a strange mixture. Some of its content is either wrong or distorted – such as the reference to the party having canvass data for only 2% of voters. That’s wrong, and I’ve seen evidence which shows it is wrong. However, the 2% figure has the phrase “functional political data” attached to it at one point. That sounds like a carefully crafted definition designed to talk down rather than talk up how much data the party has.

Odd too is the reference to there being no link between the party’s social/web activities and its electoral database software. Odd because that wasn’t true in 2005, was true in 2010 and is already becoming untrue again with the party testing out a series of integration options across different national campaigns at the moment, including the Fair Tax campaign. So again, it looks like a carefully selected and presented statement to make things sound as bad as possible.

Even stranger is the number of people who you would expect to have seen such a document who have said they have never commissioned it, never seen it before and never used it.

Some of the comments in the document have a ring of truth to them, especially about how little work goes into analysing data compared to the other parties. However, it’s a document I understand written by a student who was temporarily employed by the party and with little background in it either.

It’s no surprise that in any organisation people sometimes have ideas on what should be done better or differently. I’ve seen plenty of these in the past. That doesn’t make all such documents well-informed or official.

The party’s take on this is:

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Wright 26th May - 1:32pm
    Although driverless cars will make the news, driverless trucks will probably be more important at first. Big trucks are EXPENSIVE so the cost of all...
  • User AvatarKay Kirkham 26th May - 12:57pm
    I don't know what was proposed on changes to the nomination process for elections but I suggest that collecting signatures on a piece of paper...
  • User AvatarTobie Abel 26th May - 12:49pm
    @David Evans - I'm young enough to remember the 80's and to have lived through the fruition of some of that mantra. Working from home,...
  • User AvatarGeoff Bell 26th May - 11:31am
    As requested I have submitted a more detailed explanation of the concept of Public Democracy to Lib Dem Voice and will provide a link to...
  • User AvatarSimon Banks 26th May - 11:29am
    Let's all start calling him de Pfeffel.
  • User AvatarSimon Banks 26th May - 11:26am
    Any technology can and does go wrong. What is more, designers and engineers are quite poor at anticipating unusual accidents because they think in channels...