That leaked campaign document which isn’t really a leaked campaign document

Over on The Spectator there’s a curious leaked document today, ostensibly a leaked internal party document setting out Liberal Democrat campaign weaknesses.

I say ostensibly because the document is a strange mixture. Some of its content is either wrong or distorted – such as the reference to the party having canvass data for only 2% of voters. That’s wrong, and I’ve seen evidence which shows it is wrong. However, the 2% figure has the phrase “functional political data” attached to it at one point. That sounds like a carefully crafted definition designed to talk down rather than talk up how much data the party has.

Odd too is the reference to there being no link between the party’s social/web activities and its electoral database software. Odd because that wasn’t true in 2005, was true in 2010 and is already becoming untrue again with the party testing out a series of integration options across different national campaigns at the moment, including the Fair Tax campaign. So again, it looks like a carefully selected and presented statement to make things sound as bad as possible.

Even stranger is the number of people who you would expect to have seen such a document who have said they have never commissioned it, never seen it before and never used it.

Some of the comments in the document have a ring of truth to them, especially about how little work goes into analysing data compared to the other parties. However, it’s a document I understand written by a student who was temporarily employed by the party and with little background in it either.

It’s no surprise that in any organisation people sometimes have ideas on what should be done better or differently. I’ve seen plenty of these in the past. That doesn’t make all such documents well-informed or official.

The party’s take on this is:

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/30414 for Twitter and emails.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohnTilley 22nd Jul - 4:24pm
    Disagreed with Tiny Benn about many, many things. But his jaundiced view of The Privy Council was entirely appropriate. Another one of those Westminster-cum-Disneyland bits...
  • User AvatarMick Taylor 22nd Jul - 4:23pm
    Telling the public that the party is over may indeed be sobering, but someone has to do it. And no, I'm not talking of going...
  • User AvatarDav 22nd Jul - 3:51pm
    In cases like the declaration of an aggressive war, there should be some form of blocking minority possible or a supermajority necessary to press on....
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 22nd Jul - 3:28pm
    An interesting postscript on Gove: a letter to the Sunday Times signed by 76 people, many of them head teachers of high-performing schools in deprived...
  • User AvatarStephen W 22nd Jul - 3:27pm
    I'm not scared. I genuinely laughed. I read this twice to decide whether it was genuinely a satire. Then considering writing a detailed rebuttal, then...
  • User AvatarTony Rowan-Wicks 22nd Jul - 3:26pm
    Government on the back of an envelope comes to mind How was the parliamentary party bamboozled into supporting so many nutty ideas? The membership was...