The Conservative candidate dilemma

Unsurprisingly, both the Liberal Democrat and Labour parties have decided to go ahead with selecting candidates for the 2015 general election based on the current constituency boundaries.

Where does that leave the Conservatives? In rather a tricky position given David Cameron’s talk of still pressing on hoping to win the boundaries vote.

All three options that leaves his party with are far from good.

Option one: copy the other two parties and select candidates based on existing boundaries. That undermines the talk of still hoping to win the boundaries vote, opening up Cameron to criticisms that not even his own party believes the vote can be won and giving members of other parties an absolute gift when it comes to the eventual debate.

Option two: select candidates based on the new boundaries. That runs into the problem of who is going to want to be selected for the new boundaries, putting time and effort into working a constituency which most likely won’t exist? Even if they do put in the effort, large parts of that effort will end up being wasted in the wrong places if the boundaries do not change.

Option three: only select for those seats which do not change much either way. The safe option – and also the option which leaves rival candidates a free run in many marginal seats.

Three options, all poor. I guess David Cameron wasn’t thinking through the practical details of political organisation when he decided to say he’d press on hoping to get boundary changes through…

UPDATE: Dilemma no more; the Conservatives will select on the old boundaries.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

  • Yes, it’s a very daft bit of posturing by Cameron designed to distract attention from the fact that he and the wrecker Jesse Norman MP haven’t just cost the Tories any chance of winning outright in 2015 (and a considerable time after that). Wait till the headlines start appearing of how much money is being wasted by forcing the boundary commission to continue working on something that’s already binned. Cameron seems to have a desire for gaffes right now.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohn Payne 6th Dec - 5:48pm
    Bernard, On a point of detail, Mark Bonham Carter’s main opponent at the famous 1958 Torrington by-election was Anthony Royle who stood as a Conservative...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 6th Dec - 5:44pm
    I sympathise with the mood of Lord Roberts , and our colleague , Eddie Sammon, and on this day do not want to rain on...
  • User AvatarJohn Peters 6th Dec - 5:40pm
    @matt The expense wasn't incurred as the deal (if indeed there was one) fell through. To me the offer sounds dodgy and the sort of...
  • User AvatarMatt (Bristol) 6th Dec - 5:39pm
    There is no suggestion at this time this money was offered by a member or donor of the LibDems, and the Green national leadership say...
  • User AvatarJohn A Stephen 6th Dec - 5:33pm
    As a member of 40 years standing I am amazed that none of the political parties in the UK have ever seen the need to...
  • User AvatarDav 6th Dec - 5:32pm
    I think I explained clearly and in some detail why Remain needed to be on the ballot paper in the event of another referendum, but...