The crisis of trust facing the news media

The Hansard Society this week published part two of its annual Audit of Political Engagement, focusing on the media and politics. Three graphs in particular stood out for me…

63% of public say tabloids “look for any excuse” to tarnish politicians

… tabloid newspapers are consistently identified by two-thirds of the public as displaying negative traits in their coverage of politics and politicians. … Tabloids are three times more likely to be perceived to be negative in their approach to the coverage of politics than are the other forms of media. … Perhaps the most notable finding, however, is that tabloid readers themselves strongly agree with the negative statements about their own newspapers of choice; indeed they are more likely than the national average for all three statements to agree that the tabloids are negative in their approach. Almost three-quarters (74%) of tabloid readers agree that their newspapers ‘are more interested in getting a story than telling the truth’, 71% that they ‘focus on negative stories about politics and politicians’, and 70% that they ‘look for any excuse to tarnish the name of politicians’.

Just 29% of public say tabloids “do a good job” of holding politicians to account

Broadsheet newspapers are viewed much less negatively than tabloids, but not as positively as television in respect of their coverage of politics. … Just 15% agree that tabloid newspapers are ‘generally fair in their representation of politicians’, and only one-quarter (25%) that they ‘help the public to learn about what is
happening in politics’.

Yet majority of public says media influences public and politicians

42% of the public claimed that the media was one of the two or three institutions they believed had most impact on people’s everyday lives, surpassing the influence of local councils (40%), the UK Parliament (30%), business (28%), the European Union (16%), the civil service (15%) and the Prime Minister (13%). Indeed, throughout the Audit lifecycle, the media is the institution that the British public consistently believes has the most impact on their life. … Only 3% think that the media has no influence at all on the public’s electoral decisions.

What does this all mean?

The findings are clear enough. And pretty unsurprising. The public view of the media, and in particular the tabloid/mid-market press, is deeply critical: newspapers are regarded as overwhelmingly negative in their political coverage and yet at the same time also incompetent at holding politicians to account. Yet they have real and significant influence. That’s a pretty toxic combination, both for the media and democracy. Television news and broadsheet newspapers score better, though not by much. As the report argues:

Overall, these results would therefore suggest that the media – particularly the print press and specifically tabloids – do not greatly benefit our democracy from the perspective of nourishing political engagement. The link between a vibrant and effective media and the dynamism of our democracy is compromised. Indeed, in this respect, the press, particularly the tabloids, appear not to be living up to the importance of their role in our democracy.

Yes, they certainly entertain and it is this that surely helps explain the sales of the red-top and mid-market titles. Understandably, looking for their own unique selling point, many of them are also effective promoters of campaigns: for example, the ‘Help for Heroes’ campaign to support military veterans, or the Sarah’s Law campaign to name and shame paedophiles. Whilst this is perceived as a form of public service by the media, nonetheless, at times, some of these campaigns could be said to actively undermine the democratic process for, unlike politicians, they have no need to mediate between different, often competing interests and demands, and they rarely grapple with nuance or complexity.

In the opinion of most members of the public, the press are simply not effective at conveying information and knowledge to their readers, nor at performing their crucial watchdog role of holding politicians and government to account. Indeed, it is not always clear exactly how some sections of the press perceive their watchdog role: denigrating politicians and undermining the political system and citizens’ faith in it, is not the same as holding the political class accountable.

Should the press (and indeed TV news) care? After all, most of the popular press continues to make money for their owners. In the short-term, perhaps not. But as Mark Pack has argued many times before, newspapers that value their brand reputations as newspapers (rather than simply Heat-style gossip-mongers) should worry that the public has such a cynical view of their trade:

Isn’t a major reason that people increasingly turn elsewhere for news that they don’t trust the quality of what comes from traditional and paid-for sources enough above those other sources? “Pay for news from us because it’ll be accurate” could be a good sell. If people trust you.

Politicians have worried for years that their negative trust reputation will impact on their ability to function. The media, until the hacking scandal and the Leveson Inquiry, has regarded itself above such considerations. Not any more.

* Stephen Tall is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice, and editor of the 2013 publication, The Coalition and Beyond: Liberal Reforms for the Decade Ahead. He is also a Research Associate for the liberal think-tank CentreForum and writes at his own site, The Collected Stephen Tall.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/29527 for Twitter and emails.

4 Comments

  • Interesting! However, I’ll bet that having such opinions, has little affect on the ‘newspapers’ they buy.

    I remember a years ago a certain paper publicised it’s ‘expose’ of princess Di. Almost all those asked said how ‘discraceful’ and ‘sleazy’ it was…the tabloid ‘sold out’ at almost every newsagent.

  • It would help a great deal if the TV news, especially the BBC, did not slavishly rely on the newspaper headlines to fill their airtime and then allow them to dictate the TV news agenda. The very best TV journalism is where their own dedicated reporter has gone out to the location and reports what s/he finds.

  • Helen Dudden 25th Jul '12 - 8:55am

    When ever has news been news, when it is good news. Inpart, I think just look at the newspapers.

    I feel that the news media should be impartial.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarSimon 31st Aug - 12:59am
    Community politics is NOT community activism. Please read the original pamphlet online.
  • User AvatarLiberal Al 31st Aug - 12:41am
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-politics/10214326/One-to-watch-Why-political-campaigner-Daisy-Cooper-is-going-places.html An interesting article on this very articulate candidate. This really is a tough presidency campaign, but I like the focus of this positive article...
  • User AvatarATF 31st Aug - 12:37am
    @Geoffrey Payne I hope that it is isn't. Far better they spend their time out there talking to people rather than, as so often seems...
  • User AvatarLiberal Al 31st Aug - 12:30am
    These ones are NOT so different. (sorry.)
  • User AvatarLiberal Al 31st Aug - 12:28am
    Another great article by Maajid. We need to help the Middle East to start giving its people a positive message of Liberalism, something they can...
  • User AvatarDaniel Henry 31st Aug - 12:23am
    Pickety is difficult reading. I've been working through it for months and still haven't passed the half way mark. Very interesting though...