The Independent View: Clegg should champion ‘everyday integration’

Nick Clegg’s speech later today will remind us of how crucial an effective immigration policy is to Britain. One of the areas that has been the least developed by previous governments, as well as the Coalition government, is a clear integration policy. Far too often, integration policy has focused on the symbolic notions of identity and much less on the everyday experiences of individuals that might be able to capture better experiences of integration.

Although the UK’s experience of integration is generally positive, outcomes for different groups and in different places across the country are still very mixed. A new IPPR report published today also confirms this mixed picture particularly in relation to educational achievement, showing that while some children with migrant backgrounds are outperforming their British counterparts, others are still lagging behind.

Last year, the department for Communities and Local Government published a new migrant integration strategy. The strategy appears to indicate that central government has no active role to play in this area of policies. The document maps out an approach based on ‘localism’, educational reform, and getting people off welfare and into work. It lists “five key factors” such as responsibility, social mobility, which it argues contribute to integration. While these factors are no doubt important, the overall strategy is marked by a lack of on the part of central government to play any real leadership role on this issue.

If anything happens to encourage integration in the next two years it will depend on initiatives taken in local civic contexts. In some senses this is the right approach but would remain contingent on a strong national integration policy framework as well as resources that would support such initiatives.

An overarching integration government policy should start by addressing obstacles to integration such as language that directly affect the ability of individuals to participate fully in the communities where they live. Policy on integration should then be focused on the places where people mix in their everyday lives, such as early-years childcare schools and workplaces.

This is especially important given changing patterns of migration. As migration becomes increasingly diverse and more often temporary, people are constantly led to negotiate and renegotiate their own identities and their relationships with others. They do so, of course, largely within the everyday settings of normal life, not in theoretical debates about ‘values’ or ‘Britishness’. If we are to have a stable and well-integrated society in the face of population ‘churn’, we will need to have more and more everyday interactions which cut across boundaries.

* Myriam Cherti is Senior Research Fellow at IPPR

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in The Independent View.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/33804 for Twitter and emails.

3 Comments

  • “Nick Clegg’s speech later today will remind us of how crucial an effective immigration policy is to Britain.”

    By counter-example?

  • Simon Banks 26th Mar '13 - 9:10am

    Any overall guidance or policy should focus on bringing people together – not being able to communicate in a common language is an obvious barrier to this – and promoting co-operation and not fall into the trap of trying to make people conform to a disputable picture of Britishness. Anyway, Asian and Black people in Wales and Scotland who integrate share Welsh and Scottish identities which may differ from that picture.

    Localism is important here, though. Some towns and cities have concentrations that are not unjustly termed ghettoes. The situation in rural areas, or indeed on Tyneside or in Cardiff, is very different.

  • Simon Banks 26th Mar '13 - 9:10am

    Any overall guidance or policy should focus on bringing people together – not being able to communicate in a common language is an obvious barrier to this – and promoting co-operation and not fall into the trap of trying to make people conform to a disputable picture of Britishness. Anyway, Asian and Black people in Wales and Scotland who integrate share Welsh and Scottish identities which may differ from that picture.

    Localism is important here, though. Some towns and cities have concentrations that are not unjustly termed ghettoes. The situation in rural areas, or indeed on Tyneside or in Cardiff, is very different.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User Avatarmalcolm blount 25th Oct - 5:39pm
    salmond recently referred to "the westminster mess". Why dont we remind him that the major factor in the banking crisis was the collapse of the...
  • User AvatarMartin Land 25th Oct - 5:35pm
    No gains, no losses, no candidates. Head Office must be SO proud.
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 25th Oct - 5:25pm
    Helen Tedcastle So I don’t think it is entirely fair to condemn protest movements which are essentially spawned by the failure of political leadership and...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 25th Oct - 4:58pm
    One of the obvious conclusions is that the approach that Paddy and his friends and the EU was keen to push didn't actually address the...
  • User AvatarGF 25th Oct - 4:53pm
    Paul in Wokingham says, "And I have little idea of what Liberal Democrats stand for. We have this anodyne message about fairer/stronger economy/society that means...
  • User AvatarPeter Andrews 25th Oct - 4:44pm
    I want regional devolution not piece meal devolution to City regions on demand which will just cause multiple 'West Lothian questions'