The Independent View: Clegg should champion ‘everyday integration’

Nick Clegg’s speech later today will remind us of how crucial an effective immigration policy is to Britain. One of the areas that has been the least developed by previous governments, as well as the Coalition government, is a clear integration policy. Far too often, integration policy has focused on the symbolic notions of identity and much less on the everyday experiences of individuals that might be able to capture better experiences of integration.

Although the UK’s experience of integration is generally positive, outcomes for different groups and in different places across the country are still very mixed. A new IPPR report published today also confirms this mixed picture particularly in relation to educational achievement, showing that while some children with migrant backgrounds are outperforming their British counterparts, others are still lagging behind.

Last year, the department for Communities and Local Government published a new migrant integration strategy. The strategy appears to indicate that central government has no active role to play in this area of policies. The document maps out an approach based on ‘localism’, educational reform, and getting people off welfare and into work. It lists “five key factors” such as responsibility, social mobility, which it argues contribute to integration. While these factors are no doubt important, the overall strategy is marked by a lack of on the part of central government to play any real leadership role on this issue.

If anything happens to encourage integration in the next two years it will depend on initiatives taken in local civic contexts. In some senses this is the right approach but would remain contingent on a strong national integration policy framework as well as resources that would support such initiatives.

An overarching integration government policy should start by addressing obstacles to integration such as language that directly affect the ability of individuals to participate fully in the communities where they live. Policy on integration should then be focused on the places where people mix in their everyday lives, such as early-years childcare schools and workplaces.

This is especially important given changing patterns of migration. As migration becomes increasingly diverse and more often temporary, people are constantly led to negotiate and renegotiate their own identities and their relationships with others. They do so, of course, largely within the everyday settings of normal life, not in theoretical debates about ‘values’ or ‘Britishness’. If we are to have a stable and well-integrated society in the face of population ‘churn’, we will need to have more and more everyday interactions which cut across boundaries.

* Myriam Cherti is Senior Research Fellow at IPPR

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in The Independent View.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/33804 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

3 Comments

  • “Nick Clegg’s speech later today will remind us of how crucial an effective immigration policy is to Britain.”

    By counter-example?

  • Simon Banks 26th Mar '13 - 9:10am

    Any overall guidance or policy should focus on bringing people together – not being able to communicate in a common language is an obvious barrier to this – and promoting co-operation and not fall into the trap of trying to make people conform to a disputable picture of Britishness. Anyway, Asian and Black people in Wales and Scotland who integrate share Welsh and Scottish identities which may differ from that picture.

    Localism is important here, though. Some towns and cities have concentrations that are not unjustly termed ghettoes. The situation in rural areas, or indeed on Tyneside or in Cardiff, is very different.

  • Simon Banks 26th Mar '13 - 9:10am

    Any overall guidance or policy should focus on bringing people together – not being able to communicate in a common language is an obvious barrier to this – and promoting co-operation and not fall into the trap of trying to make people conform to a disputable picture of Britishness. Anyway, Asian and Black people in Wales and Scotland who integrate share Welsh and Scottish identities which may differ from that picture.

    Localism is important here, though. Some towns and cities have concentrations that are not unjustly termed ghettoes. The situation in rural areas, or indeed on Tyneside or in Cardiff, is very different.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarSteve Way 18th Dec - 9:26am
    Paul is correct that it is always immoral. Military Law as supplemented by local rules of engagement, applicable UK Laws, and, in some circumstances, local...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 18th Dec - 9:23am
    @ David Evershed - ... and that known quantity is that the Lib Dems lose 300 to 400 councillors a year, most of its MSPs,...
  • User Avatarg 18th Dec - 8:34am
    Tory EVEL plans are simply about ensuring Labour (assuming the SNP don't wipe them out completely) are less likely to be able to form a...
  • User AvatarJennie 18th Dec - 8:33am
    Tony: I'm sure that David is quite capable of rebuffing my joking advance should we ever actually be in the same room and the need...
  • User AvatarPaul Walter 18th Dec - 7:25am
    I don't equivocate here at all. The army manual and the GC should apply at all times, for all captured comabattants including those we think...
  • User AvatarPeter Davies 18th Dec - 6:58am
    EVEL and devolution of powers within England are the same issue: "Who should exercise outside Scotland, the power that the residents of Scotland exercise there?"....