The Independent View: Political Innovation No.5 – Government information? Get the public to provide it!

This is a guest cross-post by Lauren Currie – originally posted on the Political Innovation site here.

For too long, policymaking has been monopolised by civil servants, self-serving pressure groups and sensationalist journalists. We get a vote once every four or five years and we’re expected to be satisfied with that.

Public services are too important to get lost in headline issues, and too big to leave to those who have the time and energy to write letters or sit on committees. The best communication happens when it’s easy to do, and when it’s a conversation, not just a complaint.

For this reason, in 2009, a group of us created MyPolice. It was a collaborative project that came out of the Social Innovation Camp. It’s an online feedback tool that enables the public and police to have a conversation. It facilitates three things.

  • It’s a neutral space where people can find out more about who their local police are, and what they do.
  • it allows people to send feedback about their experiences with the police, good or bad, which then gets delivered to the right force.
  • it collects empathic data based on real customer experience and feeds it back to the police, which creates a deeper understanding of what the public wants, bringing police and public closer together.

We help communities identify weaknesses and opportunities in police services. In providing analysis and data for the police to act on, it challenges and helps make policy decisions, ensuring that service users have an active part in changing the police for the better. People can give their opinion at a time when they feel strongly about an encounter with the police or feel that the service offered by the police could be improved. It’s the place where people can see how their thoughts translate directly into action.

We have a funding model that is politically acceptable to both left and right (Labour as one of the most innovative social enterprises in Britain, and the Conservatives say it is ‘potentially transformative’). We charge a small annual fee to every force that takes part and provide the software and methodology that makes it work for them.

The cost is far outweighed by the benefits in terms of efficiency and quality. The people for whom the police exist get a better and more inclusive service.

The idea of a ‘candid friend’ – neither a hectoring simplifying journalist / pressure group, nor spinning apologist for an unresponsive service – isn’t entirely new. The excellent Patient Opinion project achieves exactly the same ends in a way that is tailored to the services provided by the NHS.

This brings me to the political innovation that I would like to propose: Let’s set a target whereby significant sections of the public sector aim to replace all self-produced information about themselves with content that is generated by the users. This can’t simply be a crude ‘have your say’ exercise – but I think that MyPolice and Patient Opinion both show that it’s possible to get good fair descriptions of public services authored by all of us.

That’s better than just a one-size-fits-all X in a ballot box every five years, isn’t it?

About Political Innovation

We’d be very interested to hear any ideas that you have for an essay of your own –we’ll need an emailand we’ll want to discuss it with you before it goes on the site. All contributions will be archived onwww.politicalinnovation.org – along with details of what we’re looking for from essayists and a bunch of FAQs and a guide to how we hope the whole thing will play out.

I hope you’ll get involved in this as a commenter, participant or maybe even as an essayist. Make sure you don’t miss anything by joining our Google Group, subscribing to the blog RSS feed, gettingeach post emailed to you and, of course, following us on Twitter and Facebook.

The Independent View‘ is a slot on Lib Dem Voice which allows those from beyond the party to contribute to debates we believe are of interest to LDV’s readers. Please email [email protected] if you are interested in contributing.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Op-eds and The Independent View.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Matthew Huntbach 28th Sep '10 - 9:58am


    For too long, policymaking has been monopolised by civil servants, self-serving pressure groups and sensationalist journalists. We get a vote once every four or five years and we’re expected to be satisfied with that.

    But that is rubbish – if all anyone wants to do is vote every four or five years, fine, but we live in a democracy and there is so much more people can do if they want to. Like join a political party and get active in it.

    This line we hear so often “We get a vote once every four or five years and we’re expected to be satisfied with that” assumes politicians are some alien species who are imposed on us. NO, NO, NO!! The whole POINT of parties is like ours is to work as a mechanism to get ordinary people actively involved in politics. But the people who run our society – big business and the media establishment – hate this, which is why they are always running down grass roots politics and political activity by ordinary people. They want politics to be all about people like them, remote elite types, running everything and pushing around the little folk. That is why they are so keen on painting democratic politics in just the way Mr Currie does here.

  • Has this system actually been used anywhere? Could see any details on your website but maybe there was a pilot somewhere?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMatt (Bristol) 25th Sep - 5:30pm
    Peter, Richard -- I'm not entirely sure about 'continual' plebiscites, but neither am I sure about Richard's dictum of the primacy of the businesses who...
  • User AvatarJulian Tisi 25th Sep - 5:14pm
    What an excellent article and what a debate it has generated! There's an interesting article in the Times today which suggested that the decision to...
  • User AvatarMalcolm Todd 25th Sep - 5:12pm
    paul barker 25th Sep '17 - 3:40pm "This issue raises one of the clearest differences between Liberalism & Labourism & affects mostly younger people." If...
  • User AvatarRichard Kilpatrick 25th Sep - 5:01pm
    Thank you all for your contributions. Ian and Maureen - Tees Valley Region (which includes Darlington) is in a much better position than the North...
  • User AvatarMick Taylor 25th Sep - 4:54pm
    @Paul Ankers I simply said that EARS had now produced a tool called EARS lite which does all that minivan can do and more PLUS...
  • User AvatarJoeB 25th Sep - 4:52pm
    Why no mention of the happiness index http://worldhappiness.report/ed/2017/. The index is based on social foundations - caring, freedom, generosity, honesty, health, income and good governance...