The Independent View: The Coalition needs to get serious about protecting citizens’ privacy

Slowly, we are waking up to the enormous risk to personal privacy posed by the misuse of personal information.

Big Brother Watch’s report into the data protection breaches in the NHS highlighted a number of harrowing individual cases. However, the wider cultural question is the one which should be of greatest concern.

In an age when ever more personal information is collected as a matter of routine by both the public and private sector, how that information is held and protected is of critical importance. When that information is of the kind of sensitive details found in medical records, lax attitudes towards confidentiality and privacy are unacceptable.

Despite the much publicised decision to scrap the last Government’s NHS IT boondoggle, one element was quietly retained – the Summary Care Record.

As highlighted by our report ‘Broken Records’, this system will allow more than 100,000 non-medical staff access to patient information, with no requirement or check that they have any need to see the contents of a record.
There are clear steps that can be taken. Proper audit trails of who accesses records – assigned to individuals, not terminals – will add accountability, and much more robust training about the importance of privacy.

This kind of measures will help develop a more rigorous and respectful culture around personal information. Equally important is the work being done by a range of groups to highlight the incidents that would otherwise go unreported and to keep up the pressure for more attention to be paid to the problem.

Furthermore, there are two fundamental changes that are of a more serious nature. Firstly, infringing the privacy of someone – be they a patient, customer or marketing database entry – should be treated far more seriously. Verbal warnings and counselling appear frequently in the research we conduct, and only in a small proportion is employment terminated.

Secondly, the penalties under the Data Protection Act are clearly inadequate. The corporate penalty is of insignificance to the large organisations that hold the most information, while individuals are likely to escape with a small fine.

There is also a broader question that should be asked much more frequently – how much information is needed to provide the service in the first place? Big Brother Watch will be talking much more in future about the tendency of organisations in both the public and private sector to harvest as much information as possible. Simply, the greater the volume of information held, the greater the risk to our privacy.

There is one final, legislative step that requires urgent attention. The Justice Select Committee was the latest body to call for prison sentences to be available to judges presiding over cases involving breaches of the Data Protection Act, a move Big Brother Watch had previously said is much needed along with the Information Commissioner.

This power has already been legislated; however it remains to be enacted.

If the Coalition is serious about civil liberties and protecting privacy, delaying further on giving courts the tools to protect our personal information is unforgivable.

* Nick Pickles is Director of Big Brother Watch.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in The Independent View.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/25864 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

One Comment

  • This is a good and pertinent article. But it is important to discriminate between the abuses of private data and the insidious attempts to crack down on the purveying of tittle tattle about the famous – a ‘right’ never available to the hoi polloi.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarLiberal Al 20th Dec - 12:09pm
    This is a fantastic piece: especially as it actually understands that the debate on the European Union is more to do with identity than economics....
  • User AvatarLiberal Al 20th Dec - 12:00pm
    Tsar, whilst I am sure there are those in certain parts of 'Western world' (that oh so real and not in anyway outdated concept) who...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 20th Dec - 11:55am
    Ian Mollinson asks “What made us believe that they would willingly agree to proportional voting legislation or changes to the House of Lords?” Well the...
  • User AvatarJenny Barnes 20th Dec - 11:38am
    Talking of freeloaders. How about those with large amounts of inherited wealth? Are they freeloaders? Or is that ok because their ancestors came over with...
  • User AvatarNigel Jones 20th Dec - 11:18am
    Thank you Nick for this tribute and in particular for getting it put here on LDV for the rest of us to read. In our...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 20th Dec - 11:15am
    Yes, spoiled children make all sorts of remarks about how their parents are unfair when they don't let them get what they want! Somehow the...
Sat 20th Dec 2014
Sat 3rd Jan 2015
Wed 14th Jan 2015
Thu 15th Jan 2015
Fri 16th Jan 2015