The Independent View: The Coalition needs to get serious about protecting citizens’ privacy

Slowly, we are waking up to the enormous risk to personal privacy posed by the misuse of personal information.

Big Brother Watch’s report into the data protection breaches in the NHS highlighted a number of harrowing individual cases. However, the wider cultural question is the one which should be of greatest concern.

In an age when ever more personal information is collected as a matter of routine by both the public and private sector, how that information is held and protected is of critical importance. When that information is of the kind of sensitive details found in medical records, lax attitudes towards confidentiality and privacy are unacceptable.

Despite the much publicised decision to scrap the last Government’s NHS IT boondoggle, one element was quietly retained – the Summary Care Record.

As highlighted by our report ‘Broken Records’, this system will allow more than 100,000 non-medical staff access to patient information, with no requirement or check that they have any need to see the contents of a record.
There are clear steps that can be taken. Proper audit trails of who accesses records – assigned to individuals, not terminals – will add accountability, and much more robust training about the importance of privacy.

This kind of measures will help develop a more rigorous and respectful culture around personal information. Equally important is the work being done by a range of groups to highlight the incidents that would otherwise go unreported and to keep up the pressure for more attention to be paid to the problem.

Furthermore, there are two fundamental changes that are of a more serious nature. Firstly, infringing the privacy of someone – be they a patient, customer or marketing database entry – should be treated far more seriously. Verbal warnings and counselling appear frequently in the research we conduct, and only in a small proportion is employment terminated.

Secondly, the penalties under the Data Protection Act are clearly inadequate. The corporate penalty is of insignificance to the large organisations that hold the most information, while individuals are likely to escape with a small fine.

There is also a broader question that should be asked much more frequently – how much information is needed to provide the service in the first place? Big Brother Watch will be talking much more in future about the tendency of organisations in both the public and private sector to harvest as much information as possible. Simply, the greater the volume of information held, the greater the risk to our privacy.

There is one final, legislative step that requires urgent attention. The Justice Select Committee was the latest body to call for prison sentences to be available to judges presiding over cases involving breaches of the Data Protection Act, a move Big Brother Watch had previously said is much needed along with the Information Commissioner.

This power has already been legislated; however it remains to be enacted.

If the Coalition is serious about civil liberties and protecting privacy, delaying further on giving courts the tools to protect our personal information is unforgivable.

* Nick Pickles is Director of Big Brother Watch.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in The Independent View.
Advert

One Comment

  • This is a good and pertinent article. But it is important to discriminate between the abuses of private data and the insidious attempts to crack down on the purveying of tittle tattle about the famous – a ‘right’ never available to the hoi polloi.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 4th May - 5:31am
    David ,If you mean Eddie above , you do him and our party a disservice. I am staunch in my view in opposition to the...
  • User AvatarManfarang 4th May - 3:24am
    Emma In most countries abroad, those working are required to a file tax return in the country they live.(In the hell on earth of some...
  • User AvatarRoland 4th May - 3:01am
    @Peter - "Potentially that foreign doctor/nurse/engineer/etc. could compete in the job market by working for a lower gross salary and receive the same nett income...
  • User AvatarRoland 4th May - 2:25am
    This is good work and the article also provides an insight into the workings of the House that doesn't get mentioned in the text books...
  • User AvatarRoland 4th May - 2:22am
    @Peter - Thanks for the link to the NHS site over unsocial hours and would tend to concur with your concerns. My point however was...
  • User AvatarJonathan Ferguson 4th May - 12:00am
    Thank you everyone for your comments. I will think carefully before providing more responses. It is late at night, but I will try to answer...