Opinion: The Presidential elections – a French farce?

Today, France goes to the polls in the first of two ballots to select its next President; polls suggest that incumbent Nicholas Sarkozy and socialist Francois Hollande will go head to head in the run-off on Sunday 8 May.

The Presidental election and subsequent legislative elections are a real challenge for Liberals. Our sister party, the Mouvement Democrate (MoDem) led by Francois Bayrou has struggled during this campaign. Bayrou, a popular former Education Minister, has lost momentum in an environment where populism and a breathtaking level of denial has characterized the debate.

‘Bling Bling’ Sarkozy has become a deeply unpopular figure due to his penchant for extravagant behaviours in office. Banging the populist drum, he set out his political stall for the upcoming campaign to Le Figaro magazine at the beginning of February. His priorities, he explained, included opposing gay marriage and adoption as well as euthanasia. This was not a President ready to face up to the heavy responsibilities of economic reform.

Francois Hollande, his Socialist opponent has done little more to address coherently the economic challenges for France. His centerpiece policy of creating 60,000 new teaching jobs in the education system and hints that he would reduce the retirement age from 62 to 60 defy the era of austerity.

Marine Le Pen’s attempts to ‘modernise’ the Front National have been proven hollow. Her decision to attend a ball in Vienna organized by the Austrian far right on the 67th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz was disgraceful; she has reverted to type.

Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the leader of the far left Front de Gauche has been brazen, wrapping himself in the flag of the French revolution, calling for a citizens’ insurrection and a renegotiation of EU treaties. Surging in the polls, Mélenchon looks set to come third in today’s election.

For Liberals in France, this has been a desperate contest where the big issue of the day, the economy, has been ignored. Bayrou has faced a tough fight. Bluff, like our own Vince Cable, he has been unique in talking of the need for deep cuts. The Economist observed Bayrou was the only candidate focusing his campaign on the real issues on which the future of France depends. Yet, his message, and campaign, doesn’t appear to have resonated with the electorate.

With the prospect of losing in today’s first round vote, Bayrou will be focusing on bolstering MoDem’s future in the realignment of the political landscape in the wake of a Sarkozy defeat. This will present an opportunity to build the liberal centre.

Whatever the outcome for MoDem and French Liberalism today and in the legislative elections in June, the electorate will surely remember that it was Bayrou – and only he – who spoke of the hard decisions that France now faces. Liberals rarely shirk from hard realities, and that will serve our French friends well in the long term.

* Andrew Wigley is a public affairs professional who has lived and worked in the US and the Middle East. He began his career working for the Liberal Democrats, first in London and then Brussels. He previously managed community and public affairs for an oil company with facilities near In Amenas.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News and Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/28188 for Twitter and emails.

8 Comments

  • Matthew Huntbach 22nd Apr '12 - 3:42pm

    I like Bayrou a lot, I liked him when he stood last time, sorry he didn’t do better then and glad to see he’s still going. However, isn’t he more of a Christian Democrat than a Liberal, particularly in continental terms?

  • “Whatever the outcome for MoDem and French Liberalism today and in the legislative elections in June, the electorate will surely remember that it was Bayrou – and only he – who spoke of the hard decisions that France now faces”

    Is this a joke? Bayrou has been rubbish in this campaign, failing to craft out a coherent and distinctive space and struggling in the polls as a result

    The French Presidential elections are a salutory reminder that politics in advanced economies nevertheless remains primarily about left versus right

  • Paul Murray 22nd Apr '12 - 7:12pm

    First results at 7pm:

    Hollande 28%
    Sarkozy 25%
    Le Pen 20%
    Melenchon 12%

    Strong showing by the extremists

  • And now hot on the heels of the 20% that the National Front got in France, we’ve got a general election in The Netherlands that has been triggered by the fiscal compact.

    Geert Wilders has withdrawn his far-right party from the coalition governement saying that he cannot tolerate the cuts being demanded by Brussels : “We don’t want to make our retirees bleed for Brussels’ diktats”.

    In an age when Brussels demands that we abandon Keynes and engage in the economically suicidal policies of austerity/deflation/depression (simultaneously demanding huge budget increases for themselves) we will surely find that electorates become more open to the simplistic, strident messages of the far right.

    And yet all I hear from the senior leadership of The Party is shattering silence. I distinctly recall Vince Cable talking during the general election about how you can’t take a patient off the drip when he’s still critically ill. I still think that’s an good simile. Why was it right in April 2010 but wrong in April 2012?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter 20th Aug - 10:54pm
    I should have added that the climate scientists who disagree with the accepted hypothesis are forced to keep their mouths shut and do as they...
  • User AvatarPeter 20th Aug - 10:37pm
    JoeBourke I think your perception of the scientific research and learning process may be more generous and rosy than the reality. Unfortunately climate science is...
  • User AvatarColin 20th Aug - 10:00pm
    @paul barker, "I cannot imagine any version of Liberalism that includes Nationalism in any form. The UK is not an Empire & Scotland isnt a...
  • User AvatarAndrew Page 20th Aug - 9:54pm
    I agree with much of what Denis writes. After all, I have been making the liberal case for voting "Yes" on my blog (A Scottish...
  • User Avatarjedibeeftrix 20th Aug - 9:44pm
    @ PB - "I cannot imagine any version of Liberalism that includes Nationalism in any form." no, really? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalism#Varieties
  • User AvatarTony Greaves 20th Aug - 9:34pm
    Most of this pretends that we are just a "voluntary organisation". We are not, we are a political party and little progress will be made...